来自自我疏离和自我沉浸压力源反思的优秀运动员应对洞察模式的定性研究。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Elizabeth M Murdoch, Joanne Ayers, Monique F Crane, Nikos Ntoumanis, Carly J Brade, Eleanor Quested, Daniel F Gucciardi
{"title":"来自自我疏离和自我沉浸压力源反思的优秀运动员应对洞察模式的定性研究。","authors":"Elizabeth M Murdoch, Joanne Ayers, Monique F Crane, Nikos Ntoumanis, Carly J Brade, Eleanor Quested, Daniel F Gucciardi","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2025.2520617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elite sport involves confronting stressors that can disrupt athletes' functionality and harm their psychological well-being. Reflecting on these stressors is crucial for gaining insights into coping strategies and future adaptations. We aimed to examine the coping insights developed from engagement in these reflective practices. Via a qualitative analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial, athletes were randomized to a self-distanced (<i>n</i> = 33) or self-immersed condition (<i>n</i> = 33) and guided to reflect systematically on a key stressor each week over a five-week period. Using an established self-reflection and coping insight framework to guide our framework analysis, we interpreted <i>both</i> similarities and differences between groups across various coping insights. Athletes exhibited signs of self-awareness, trigger identification, and re-appraisal, regardless of their reflective perspective. However, athletes from both groups reported limited insight into values consideration, evaluation, and fostering a future-focus. Stressors reported by athletes were predominantly mild in magnitude or \"everyday\" in nature. Our findings highlight the need for robust examinations of the self-reflection approach to unlock higher-level insights (future-focus, evaluation of coping strategies) that can enhance resilient capacities. Challenges with recruitment and retention highlights the need for pilot and feasibility analyzes before progressing to fully powered randomized controlled trials with athlete populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative investigation of elite athletes' coping insight patterns from self-distanced and self-immersed stressor reflections.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M Murdoch, Joanne Ayers, Monique F Crane, Nikos Ntoumanis, Carly J Brade, Eleanor Quested, Daniel F Gucciardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2025.2520617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Elite sport involves confronting stressors that can disrupt athletes' functionality and harm their psychological well-being. Reflecting on these stressors is crucial for gaining insights into coping strategies and future adaptations. We aimed to examine the coping insights developed from engagement in these reflective practices. Via a qualitative analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial, athletes were randomized to a self-distanced (<i>n</i> = 33) or self-immersed condition (<i>n</i> = 33) and guided to reflect systematically on a key stressor each week over a five-week period. Using an established self-reflection and coping insight framework to guide our framework analysis, we interpreted <i>both</i> similarities and differences between groups across various coping insights. Athletes exhibited signs of self-awareness, trigger identification, and re-appraisal, regardless of their reflective perspective. However, athletes from both groups reported limited insight into values consideration, evaluation, and fostering a future-focus. Stressors reported by athletes were predominantly mild in magnitude or \\\"everyday\\\" in nature. Our findings highlight the need for robust examinations of the self-reflection approach to unlock higher-level insights (future-focus, evaluation of coping strategies) that can enhance resilient capacities. Challenges with recruitment and retention highlights the need for pilot and feasibility analyzes before progressing to fully powered randomized controlled trials with athlete populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2520617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2520617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精英运动包括面对可能破坏运动员功能和损害他们心理健康的压力源。反思这些压力源对于获得应对策略和未来适应的洞察力至关重要。我们的目的是研究从参与这些反思实践中发展出来的应对见解。通过对一项先导随机对照试验的定性分析,运动员被随机分为自我疏离(n = 33)和自我沉浸(n = 33)两组,并被引导在五周的时间内每周系统地反思一个关键的压力源。使用一个已建立的自我反思和应对洞察力框架来指导我们的框架分析,我们解释了不同应对洞察力的群体之间的异同。运动员表现出自我意识、触发识别和重新评估的迹象,无论他们的反思观点如何。然而,两组运动员在价值考虑、评估和培养对未来的关注方面的洞察力都很有限。运动员报告的压力源主要是轻微的或“日常”的性质。我们的研究结果强调,需要对自我反思方法进行强有力的检查,以揭示能够增强弹性能力的更高层次的见解(关注未来,评估应对策略)。招募和保留运动员所面临的挑战凸显了在对运动员群体进行完全随机对照试验之前进行试点和可行性分析的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative investigation of elite athletes' coping insight patterns from self-distanced and self-immersed stressor reflections.

Elite sport involves confronting stressors that can disrupt athletes' functionality and harm their psychological well-being. Reflecting on these stressors is crucial for gaining insights into coping strategies and future adaptations. We aimed to examine the coping insights developed from engagement in these reflective practices. Via a qualitative analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial, athletes were randomized to a self-distanced (n = 33) or self-immersed condition (n = 33) and guided to reflect systematically on a key stressor each week over a five-week period. Using an established self-reflection and coping insight framework to guide our framework analysis, we interpreted both similarities and differences between groups across various coping insights. Athletes exhibited signs of self-awareness, trigger identification, and re-appraisal, regardless of their reflective perspective. However, athletes from both groups reported limited insight into values consideration, evaluation, and fostering a future-focus. Stressors reported by athletes were predominantly mild in magnitude or "everyday" in nature. Our findings highlight the need for robust examinations of the self-reflection approach to unlock higher-level insights (future-focus, evaluation of coping strategies) that can enhance resilient capacities. Challenges with recruitment and retention highlights the need for pilot and feasibility analyzes before progressing to fully powered randomized controlled trials with athlete populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信