改善2型糖尿病患者心理社会护理的干预措施

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Deborah J Cohen, Shannon M Sweeney, Rachel Springer, Bijal A Balasubramanian, LeAnn Michaels, Miguel Marino, Danielle Hessler, Andrea Baron, Johanna Nesse
{"title":"改善2型糖尿病患者心理社会护理的干预措施","authors":"Deborah J Cohen, Shannon M Sweeney, Rachel Springer, Bijal A Balasubramanian, LeAnn Michaels, Miguel Marino, Danielle Hessler, Andrea Baron, Johanna Nesse","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240265R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This proof-of-concept study tested the feasibility and acceptability of INTEGRATE-D, an implementation support intervention for primary care clinics to improve the psychosocial care of patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cluster randomized controlled pragmatic trial, with a parallel, convergent mixed methods design. Two Intervention Clinics (ICs) were offered tailored training on American Diabetes Association (ADA)-recommended psychosocial care and facilitation to identify and support clinical change. Two Control Clinics (CCs) received no intervention.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>intervention acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>process-of-care metrics (eg, depression screening, diabetes management) and clinical outcomes measures (PHQ-9 and A1C). Qualitative data were collected to assess implementation and experience with the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICs were offered training and received 15-months of facilitation. To accommodate COVID-19-related safety restrictions, the intervention was changed to be delivered virtually (eg, remote facilitation and training sessions). Despite an adapted delivery and COVID-19 and staffing stressors, clinics exposed to INTEGRATE-D found it to be acceptable, well-aligned with clinics' needs, and feasible. Qualitative data suggest COVID-19 stressors tempered feasibility. The effect of INTEGRATE-D on process and clinical outcome measures were mixed. Several factors, including differences in ICs and CCs not addressed in randomization and delivery of a less intensive intervention due to the pandemic, may help explain these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the growing number of people with type 2 diabetes and the importance of psychosocial care for these patients, INTEGRATE-D warrants further pilot-testing with a larger sample of clinics and patients, and under conditions where in-person facilitation and expanded training is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"253-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention to Improve Psychosocial Care for People with Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah J Cohen, Shannon M Sweeney, Rachel Springer, Bijal A Balasubramanian, LeAnn Michaels, Miguel Marino, Danielle Hessler, Andrea Baron, Johanna Nesse\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240265R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This proof-of-concept study tested the feasibility and acceptability of INTEGRATE-D, an implementation support intervention for primary care clinics to improve the psychosocial care of patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cluster randomized controlled pragmatic trial, with a parallel, convergent mixed methods design. Two Intervention Clinics (ICs) were offered tailored training on American Diabetes Association (ADA)-recommended psychosocial care and facilitation to identify and support clinical change. Two Control Clinics (CCs) received no intervention.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>intervention acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>process-of-care metrics (eg, depression screening, diabetes management) and clinical outcomes measures (PHQ-9 and A1C). Qualitative data were collected to assess implementation and experience with the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICs were offered training and received 15-months of facilitation. To accommodate COVID-19-related safety restrictions, the intervention was changed to be delivered virtually (eg, remote facilitation and training sessions). Despite an adapted delivery and COVID-19 and staffing stressors, clinics exposed to INTEGRATE-D found it to be acceptable, well-aligned with clinics' needs, and feasible. Qualitative data suggest COVID-19 stressors tempered feasibility. The effect of INTEGRATE-D on process and clinical outcome measures were mixed. Several factors, including differences in ICs and CCs not addressed in randomization and delivery of a less intensive intervention due to the pandemic, may help explain these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the growing number of people with type 2 diabetes and the importance of psychosocial care for these patients, INTEGRATE-D warrants further pilot-testing with a larger sample of clinics and patients, and under conditions where in-person facilitation and expanded training is possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"253-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240265R1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240265R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项概念验证研究测试了INTEGRATE-D的可行性和可接受性,INTEGRATE-D是一种用于初级保健诊所改善2型糖尿病患者心理社会护理的实施支持干预。方法:采用平行、收敛混合方法设计的聚类随机对照实用试验。两家干预诊所(ICs)接受了美国糖尿病协会(ADA)推荐的社会心理护理和促进培训,以确定和支持临床变化。两个对照诊所(cc)没有接受干预。主要结局:干预的可接受性、适宜性和可行性。次要结局:护理过程指标(如抑郁症筛查、糖尿病管理)和临床结局指标(PHQ-9和糖化血红蛋白)。收集定性数据以评估干预措施的实施情况和经验。结果:对ic进行培训,并接受了15个月的指导。为了适应与covid -19相关的安全限制,干预措施改为虚拟提供(例如,远程促进和培训课程)。尽管经过调整的交付方式、2019冠状病毒病和人员配备方面的压力,但使用INTEGRATE-D的诊所发现,它是可以接受的,符合诊所的需求,而且是可行的。定性数据表明,COVID-19的压力因素削弱了可行性。INTEGRATE-D对过程和临床结果的影响是混合的。有几个因素可能有助于解释这些结果,包括在随机分配和提供由于大流行而强度较低的干预措施时未解决的icc和cc的差异。结论:考虑到2型糖尿病患者数量的增加以及对这些患者的社会心理护理的重要性,INTEGRATE-D需要在更大的诊所和患者样本中进行进一步的试点测试,并在可能的情况下进行现场指导和扩大培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intervention to Improve Psychosocial Care for People with Type 2 Diabetes.

Background: This proof-of-concept study tested the feasibility and acceptability of INTEGRATE-D, an implementation support intervention for primary care clinics to improve the psychosocial care of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Cluster randomized controlled pragmatic trial, with a parallel, convergent mixed methods design. Two Intervention Clinics (ICs) were offered tailored training on American Diabetes Association (ADA)-recommended psychosocial care and facilitation to identify and support clinical change. Two Control Clinics (CCs) received no intervention.

Primary outcomes: intervention acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility.

Secondary outcomes: process-of-care metrics (eg, depression screening, diabetes management) and clinical outcomes measures (PHQ-9 and A1C). Qualitative data were collected to assess implementation and experience with the intervention.

Results: ICs were offered training and received 15-months of facilitation. To accommodate COVID-19-related safety restrictions, the intervention was changed to be delivered virtually (eg, remote facilitation and training sessions). Despite an adapted delivery and COVID-19 and staffing stressors, clinics exposed to INTEGRATE-D found it to be acceptable, well-aligned with clinics' needs, and feasible. Qualitative data suggest COVID-19 stressors tempered feasibility. The effect of INTEGRATE-D on process and clinical outcome measures were mixed. Several factors, including differences in ICs and CCs not addressed in randomization and delivery of a less intensive intervention due to the pandemic, may help explain these results.

Conclusions: Given the growing number of people with type 2 diabetes and the importance of psychosocial care for these patients, INTEGRATE-D warrants further pilot-testing with a larger sample of clinics and patients, and under conditions where in-person facilitation and expanded training is possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信