在照顾老年病人的医院单位分配护理任务的时间。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason Slagle, Lucy Wilson, John F Schnelle, Jennifer Kim, Sandra F Simmons
{"title":"在照顾老年病人的医院单位分配护理任务的时间。","authors":"Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason Slagle, Lucy Wilson, John F Schnelle, Jennifer Kim, Sandra F Simmons","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitals need objective data about the time allocated to nursing tasks, particularly for older inpatients who often need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as toileting and mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive time-motion study objectively measured the time registered nurses (RNs) and nursing assistants (NAs) spent on clinical and ADL care and made comparisons by staff type. Research staff completed 277 standardized observation hours on three hospital units caring for older patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registered nurses and NAs spent 38% and 34% of their time, respectively, on indirect care tasks, with medical record documentation being most common. Both staff types spent an additional 34% of their time on direct care tasks. Medication pass consumed the most RN direct care time, and ADL care consumed the most NA direct care time. Activities of daily living care was observed in fewer than 25% of patient encounters, despite 73%-89% of patients across the three units requiring ADL care assistance. Overall, staff spent less than 10% of their time idle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Objective data related to the time allocated to nursing tasks are necessary to inform skill mix adjustments or other staffing strategies to meet older inpatients' care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Allocated to Nursing Tasks on Hospital Units Caring for Older Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason Slagle, Lucy Wilson, John F Schnelle, Jennifer Kim, Sandra F Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitals need objective data about the time allocated to nursing tasks, particularly for older inpatients who often need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as toileting and mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive time-motion study objectively measured the time registered nurses (RNs) and nursing assistants (NAs) spent on clinical and ADL care and made comparisons by staff type. Research staff completed 277 standardized observation hours on three hospital units caring for older patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registered nurses and NAs spent 38% and 34% of their time, respectively, on indirect care tasks, with medical record documentation being most common. Both staff types spent an additional 34% of their time on direct care tasks. Medication pass consumed the most RN direct care time, and ADL care consumed the most NA direct care time. Activities of daily living care was observed in fewer than 25% of patient encounters, despite 73%-89% of patients across the three units requiring ADL care assistance. Overall, staff spent less than 10% of their time idle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Objective data related to the time allocated to nursing tasks are necessary to inform skill mix adjustments or other staffing strategies to meet older inpatients' care needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院需要关于护理任务分配时间的客观数据,特别是对于经常需要帮助进行日常生活活动(adl)的老年住院患者,如如厕和行动不便。方法:采用描述性时间运动研究,客观测量注册护士(RNs)和护理助理(NAs)在临床护理和日常生活护理上花费的时间,并按工作人员类型进行比较。研究人员在三个护理老年患者的医院单位完成了277个标准化观察小时。结果:注册护士和NAs分别花费38%和34%的时间在间接护理任务上,医疗记录是最常见的。这两种类型的员工在直接护理任务上都额外花费了34%的时间。药物通过消耗的护士直接护理时间最多,日常生活护理消耗的护士直接护理时间最多。尽管三个单元中73%-89%的患者需要ADL护理协助,但在不到25%的患者就诊中观察到日常生活护理的活动。总的来说,员工空闲时间不到10%。结论:与护理任务分配时间相关的客观数据对于调整技能组合或其他人员配置策略以满足老年住院患者的护理需求是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time Allocated to Nursing Tasks on Hospital Units Caring for Older Patients.

Introduction: Hospitals need objective data about the time allocated to nursing tasks, particularly for older inpatients who often need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as toileting and mobility.

Methods: This descriptive time-motion study objectively measured the time registered nurses (RNs) and nursing assistants (NAs) spent on clinical and ADL care and made comparisons by staff type. Research staff completed 277 standardized observation hours on three hospital units caring for older patients.

Results: Registered nurses and NAs spent 38% and 34% of their time, respectively, on indirect care tasks, with medical record documentation being most common. Both staff types spent an additional 34% of their time on direct care tasks. Medication pass consumed the most RN direct care time, and ADL care consumed the most NA direct care time. Activities of daily living care was observed in fewer than 25% of patient encounters, despite 73%-89% of patients across the three units requiring ADL care assistance. Overall, staff spent less than 10% of their time idle.

Conclusions: Objective data related to the time allocated to nursing tasks are necessary to inform skill mix adjustments or other staffing strategies to meet older inpatients' care needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信