Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason Slagle, Lucy Wilson, John F Schnelle, Jennifer Kim, Sandra F Simmons
{"title":"在照顾老年病人的医院单位分配护理任务的时间。","authors":"Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason Slagle, Lucy Wilson, John F Schnelle, Jennifer Kim, Sandra F Simmons","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitals need objective data about the time allocated to nursing tasks, particularly for older inpatients who often need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as toileting and mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive time-motion study objectively measured the time registered nurses (RNs) and nursing assistants (NAs) spent on clinical and ADL care and made comparisons by staff type. Research staff completed 277 standardized observation hours on three hospital units caring for older patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registered nurses and NAs spent 38% and 34% of their time, respectively, on indirect care tasks, with medical record documentation being most common. Both staff types spent an additional 34% of their time on direct care tasks. Medication pass consumed the most RN direct care time, and ADL care consumed the most NA direct care time. Activities of daily living care was observed in fewer than 25% of patient encounters, despite 73%-89% of patients across the three units requiring ADL care assistance. Overall, staff spent less than 10% of their time idle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Objective data related to the time allocated to nursing tasks are necessary to inform skill mix adjustments or other staffing strategies to meet older inpatients' care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Allocated to Nursing Tasks on Hospital Units Caring for Older Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason Slagle, Lucy Wilson, John F Schnelle, Jennifer Kim, Sandra F Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitals need objective data about the time allocated to nursing tasks, particularly for older inpatients who often need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as toileting and mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive time-motion study objectively measured the time registered nurses (RNs) and nursing assistants (NAs) spent on clinical and ADL care and made comparisons by staff type. Research staff completed 277 standardized observation hours on three hospital units caring for older patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Registered nurses and NAs spent 38% and 34% of their time, respectively, on indirect care tasks, with medical record documentation being most common. Both staff types spent an additional 34% of their time on direct care tasks. Medication pass consumed the most RN direct care time, and ADL care consumed the most NA direct care time. Activities of daily living care was observed in fewer than 25% of patient encounters, despite 73%-89% of patients across the three units requiring ADL care assistance. Overall, staff spent less than 10% of their time idle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Objective data related to the time allocated to nursing tasks are necessary to inform skill mix adjustments or other staffing strategies to meet older inpatients' care needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Time Allocated to Nursing Tasks on Hospital Units Caring for Older Patients.
Introduction: Hospitals need objective data about the time allocated to nursing tasks, particularly for older inpatients who often need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), such as toileting and mobility.
Methods: This descriptive time-motion study objectively measured the time registered nurses (RNs) and nursing assistants (NAs) spent on clinical and ADL care and made comparisons by staff type. Research staff completed 277 standardized observation hours on three hospital units caring for older patients.
Results: Registered nurses and NAs spent 38% and 34% of their time, respectively, on indirect care tasks, with medical record documentation being most common. Both staff types spent an additional 34% of their time on direct care tasks. Medication pass consumed the most RN direct care time, and ADL care consumed the most NA direct care time. Activities of daily living care was observed in fewer than 25% of patient encounters, despite 73%-89% of patients across the three units requiring ADL care assistance. Overall, staff spent less than 10% of their time idle.
Conclusions: Objective data related to the time allocated to nursing tasks are necessary to inform skill mix adjustments or other staffing strategies to meet older inpatients' care needs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform