外伤性脑损伤后意识的快速和缓慢恢复。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sujith Swarna, Jordan R Saadon, Jermaine Robertson, Vaibhav Vagal, Nathaniel A Cleri, Kurt Butler, Xi Cheng, Yindong Hua, Seyed Morsal Mosallami Aghili, Chiemeka Uwakwe, Jason Zhang, Xuwen Zheng, Aniket Singh, Cassie Wang, Thomas Hagan, Chuan Huang, Petar M Djurić, Charles B Mikell, Sima Mofakham
{"title":"外伤性脑损伤后意识的快速和缓慢恢复。","authors":"Sujith Swarna, Jordan R Saadon, Jermaine Robertson, Vaibhav Vagal, Nathaniel A Cleri, Kurt Butler, Xi Cheng, Yindong Hua, Seyed Morsal Mosallami Aghili, Chiemeka Uwakwe, Jason Zhang, Xuwen Zheng, Aniket Singh, Cassie Wang, Thomas Hagan, Chuan Huang, Petar M Djurić, Charles B Mikell, Sima Mofakham","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02304-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Consciousness recovery after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) can take minutes to years. Despite this variability, we hypothesized that we could identify subgroups with distinct temporal recovery trajectories and that these subgroups would have distinct clinical features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze recovery trajectories for patients with sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤ 8) admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital from 2010 to 2019. Patients meeting our criteria for recovery (GCS score ≥ 13) were classified into cohorts using the slopes of their recovery trajectories. We then characterized these groups by their clinical features, neuroimaging, and electroencephalography (EEG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 501 patients with sTBI (348 men, mean age 51 years) were included in this study. Of these, 299 recovered. After analyzing their recovery rates, two distinct groups emerged, (1) fast recovery (n = 215) and (2) slow recovery (n = 84), with a median recovery time of 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-12) vs. 33 (IQR 27-44.75) days. Slow recovery patients had higher Injury Severity Scores (median 30 [IQR 25-41.75] vs. 24 [IQR 16-30]; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4495-10.6105; P < 0.001), more thalamic injury on neuroimaging (normalized volume [voxels] - 0.664 vs. 1.74; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.781; P < 0.016), and impaired interhemispheric connectivity on EEG (phase-locking value 0.35 vs. 0.44; 95% CI 0.055-0.14; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recovery after sTBI falls into two broad categories, distinguishable by injury severity, thalamic injury, and disrupted interhemispheric connectivity. This model accounts for heterogeneity in TBI outcomes and represents progress toward identifying targets for future neuromodulatory therapeutic development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast and Slow Recovery of Consciousness Following Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Sujith Swarna, Jordan R Saadon, Jermaine Robertson, Vaibhav Vagal, Nathaniel A Cleri, Kurt Butler, Xi Cheng, Yindong Hua, Seyed Morsal Mosallami Aghili, Chiemeka Uwakwe, Jason Zhang, Xuwen Zheng, Aniket Singh, Cassie Wang, Thomas Hagan, Chuan Huang, Petar M Djurić, Charles B Mikell, Sima Mofakham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02304-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Consciousness recovery after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) can take minutes to years. Despite this variability, we hypothesized that we could identify subgroups with distinct temporal recovery trajectories and that these subgroups would have distinct clinical features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze recovery trajectories for patients with sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤ 8) admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital from 2010 to 2019. Patients meeting our criteria for recovery (GCS score ≥ 13) were classified into cohorts using the slopes of their recovery trajectories. We then characterized these groups by their clinical features, neuroimaging, and electroencephalography (EEG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 501 patients with sTBI (348 men, mean age 51 years) were included in this study. Of these, 299 recovered. After analyzing their recovery rates, two distinct groups emerged, (1) fast recovery (n = 215) and (2) slow recovery (n = 84), with a median recovery time of 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-12) vs. 33 (IQR 27-44.75) days. Slow recovery patients had higher Injury Severity Scores (median 30 [IQR 25-41.75] vs. 24 [IQR 16-30]; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4495-10.6105; P < 0.001), more thalamic injury on neuroimaging (normalized volume [voxels] - 0.664 vs. 1.74; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.781; P < 0.016), and impaired interhemispheric connectivity on EEG (phase-locking value 0.35 vs. 0.44; 95% CI 0.055-0.14; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recovery after sTBI falls into two broad categories, distinguishable by injury severity, thalamic injury, and disrupted interhemispheric connectivity. This model accounts for heterogeneity in TBI outcomes and represents progress toward identifying targets for future neuromodulatory therapeutic development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02304-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02304-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)后的意识恢复可能需要几分钟到几年的时间。尽管存在这种可变性,但我们假设我们可以识别具有不同时间恢复轨迹的亚组,并且这些亚组将具有不同的临床特征。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,分析2010年至2019年石溪大学医院收治的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8分的sTBI患者的康复轨迹。符合我们的恢复标准(GCS评分≥13)的患者根据其恢复轨迹的斜率进行分组。然后,我们通过他们的临床特征,神经影像学和脑电图(EEG)来描述这些组。结果:本研究共纳入501例sTBI患者(男性348例,平均年龄51岁)。其中,299人恢复了健康。通过对两组患者的康复率进行分析,得出两组明显不同的结果:(1)快速恢复组(n = 215)和(2)缓慢恢复组(n = 84),中位恢复时间分别为6(四分位间距[IQR] 2-12)和33 (IQR 27-44.75)天。恢复缓慢的患者损伤严重程度评分较高(中位数为30 [IQR 25-41.75] vs. 24 [IQR 16-30];95%置信区间[CI] 4.4495-10.6105;p 2 = 0.781;结论:sTBI后的恢复分为两大类,根据损伤严重程度、丘脑损伤和半球间连通性中断来区分。该模型解释了TBI结果的异质性,并代表了确定未来神经调节治疗发展目标的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fast and Slow Recovery of Consciousness Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background: Consciousness recovery after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) can take minutes to years. Despite this variability, we hypothesized that we could identify subgroups with distinct temporal recovery trajectories and that these subgroups would have distinct clinical features.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze recovery trajectories for patients with sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤ 8) admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital from 2010 to 2019. Patients meeting our criteria for recovery (GCS score ≥ 13) were classified into cohorts using the slopes of their recovery trajectories. We then characterized these groups by their clinical features, neuroimaging, and electroencephalography (EEG).

Results: A total of 501 patients with sTBI (348 men, mean age 51 years) were included in this study. Of these, 299 recovered. After analyzing their recovery rates, two distinct groups emerged, (1) fast recovery (n = 215) and (2) slow recovery (n = 84), with a median recovery time of 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-12) vs. 33 (IQR 27-44.75) days. Slow recovery patients had higher Injury Severity Scores (median 30 [IQR 25-41.75] vs. 24 [IQR 16-30]; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4495-10.6105; P < 0.001), more thalamic injury on neuroimaging (normalized volume [voxels] - 0.664 vs. 1.74; R2 = 0.781; P < 0.016), and impaired interhemispheric connectivity on EEG (phase-locking value 0.35 vs. 0.44; 95% CI 0.055-0.14; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Recovery after sTBI falls into two broad categories, distinguishable by injury severity, thalamic injury, and disrupted interhemispheric connectivity. This model accounts for heterogeneity in TBI outcomes and represents progress toward identifying targets for future neuromodulatory therapeutic development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信