腰椎棘环骨折:发病率及其与隐性脊柱裂的关系。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Saori Soeda, Masatoshi Morimoto, Kosuke Sugiura, Kosaku Higashino, Shunsuke Tamaki, Keisuke Nishidono, Kiyoshi Yagi, Kazuya Kishima, Hiroaki Manabe, Koichi Sairyo
{"title":"腰椎棘环骨折:发病率及其与隐性脊柱裂的关系。","authors":"Saori Soeda, Masatoshi Morimoto, Kosuke Sugiura, Kosaku Higashino, Shunsuke Tamaki, Keisuke Nishidono, Kiyoshi Yagi, Kazuya Kishima, Hiroaki Manabe, Koichi Sairyo","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture and its association with spina bifida occulta (SBO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 973 patients (mean age 62 years [range 21-90]) with abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans available were retrospectively evaluated. The prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture and of SBO and the association between these two entities were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture was 3.8 % (n = 22) in men and 2.8 % (n = 11) in women; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.53). The incidence was highest at L5 in both men (58.3 %, n = 14) and women (38.5 %, n = 5). SBO was found in 92 patients (9.5 %), who comprised 75 men (12.9 %) and 17 women (4.4 %). The prevalence of SBO was 2.95-fold higher in men than in women (p < 0.0001). Apophyseal ring fracture was 2.6 times more frequent in patients who had SBO than in those who did not (7.6 % vs 3.0 %, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified the lower lumbar levels as the anatomical locations where apophyseal ring fracture was more likely to occur, particularly involving the anterior portion of the cephalad endplate at L3 and L4 and the posterior portion of the cephalad endplate at S1. This finding will be helpful for understanding the site of origin of apophyseal ring fractures, which can be easily overlooked. In addition, apophyseal ring fractures were more frequent in the presence of SBO, which may contribute to understanding their etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar apophyseal ring fracture: Prevalence and relationship with spina bifida occulta.\",\"authors\":\"Saori Soeda, Masatoshi Morimoto, Kosuke Sugiura, Kosaku Higashino, Shunsuke Tamaki, Keisuke Nishidono, Kiyoshi Yagi, Kazuya Kishima, Hiroaki Manabe, Koichi Sairyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2025.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture and its association with spina bifida occulta (SBO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 973 patients (mean age 62 years [range 21-90]) with abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans available were retrospectively evaluated. The prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture and of SBO and the association between these two entities were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture was 3.8 % (n = 22) in men and 2.8 % (n = 11) in women; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.53). The incidence was highest at L5 in both men (58.3 %, n = 14) and women (38.5 %, n = 5). SBO was found in 92 patients (9.5 %), who comprised 75 men (12.9 %) and 17 women (4.4 %). The prevalence of SBO was 2.95-fold higher in men than in women (p < 0.0001). Apophyseal ring fracture was 2.6 times more frequent in patients who had SBO than in those who did not (7.6 % vs 3.0 %, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified the lower lumbar levels as the anatomical locations where apophyseal ring fracture was more likely to occur, particularly involving the anterior portion of the cephalad endplate at L3 and L4 and the posterior portion of the cephalad endplate at S1. This finding will be helpful for understanding the site of origin of apophyseal ring fractures, which can be easily overlooked. In addition, apophyseal ring fractures were more frequent in the presence of SBO, which may contribute to understanding their etiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.05.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.05.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨棘环骨折的发病率及其与隐蔽性脊柱裂的关系。方法:回顾性分析973例患者(平均年龄62岁[范围21-90])的腹部和骨盆计算机断层扫描结果。我们评估了棘环骨折和SBO的患病率以及两者之间的关系。结果:男性棘环骨折发生率为3.8% (n = 22),女性为2.8% (n = 11);差异无统计学意义(p = 0.53)。在L5时,男性(58.3%,n = 14)和女性(38.5%,n = 5)的发病率最高。92例(9.5%)患者发现SBO,其中男性75例(12.9%),女性17例(4.4%)。男性SBO患病率是女性的2.95倍(p < 0.0001)。SBO患者的肩胛环骨折发生率是无SBO患者的2.6倍(7.6% vs 3.0%, p = 0.019)。结论:本研究确定了腰椎下节段是棘环骨折更容易发生的解剖位置,特别是涉及L3和L4的头终板前部和S1的头终板后部。这一发现将有助于了解棘环骨折的起源位置,这很容易被忽视。此外,肩胛环骨折在存在SBO时更为常见,这可能有助于了解其病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lumbar apophyseal ring fracture: Prevalence and relationship with spina bifida occulta.

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture and its association with spina bifida occulta (SBO).

Methods: A total of 973 patients (mean age 62 years [range 21-90]) with abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans available were retrospectively evaluated. The prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture and of SBO and the association between these two entities were evaluated.

Results: The prevalence of apophyseal ring fracture was 3.8 % (n = 22) in men and 2.8 % (n = 11) in women; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.53). The incidence was highest at L5 in both men (58.3 %, n = 14) and women (38.5 %, n = 5). SBO was found in 92 patients (9.5 %), who comprised 75 men (12.9 %) and 17 women (4.4 %). The prevalence of SBO was 2.95-fold higher in men than in women (p < 0.0001). Apophyseal ring fracture was 2.6 times more frequent in patients who had SBO than in those who did not (7.6 % vs 3.0 %, p = 0.019).

Conclusions: This study identified the lower lumbar levels as the anatomical locations where apophyseal ring fracture was more likely to occur, particularly involving the anterior portion of the cephalad endplate at L3 and L4 and the posterior portion of the cephalad endplate at S1. This finding will be helpful for understanding the site of origin of apophyseal ring fractures, which can be easily overlooked. In addition, apophyseal ring fractures were more frequent in the presence of SBO, which may contribute to understanding their etiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信