肿瘤门诊服务系统综合疼痛管理的可接受性、保真性和实施:多中心随机试验的过程评估方案。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Olivia Claire Robinson, Florence Day, Elaine G Boland, Michelle Collinson, Marie Fallon, Amanda Farrin, Kate Flemming, Sean Girvan, Sue Hartup, David Meads, Adam Hurlow, Catriona Mayland, John O'Dwyer, Simon Pini, Daniel Swinson, Suzanne H Richards, Matthew R Mulvey
{"title":"肿瘤门诊服务系统综合疼痛管理的可接受性、保真性和实施:多中心随机试验的过程评估方案。","authors":"Olivia Claire Robinson, Florence Day, Elaine G Boland, Michelle Collinson, Marie Fallon, Amanda Farrin, Kate Flemming, Sean Girvan, Sue Hartup, David Meads, Adam Hurlow, Catriona Mayland, John O'Dwyer, Simon Pini, Daniel Swinson, Suzanne H Richards, Matthew R Mulvey","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the UK National Health Service (NHS), most people with cancer are cared for at oncology outpatient services, where there are no standardised procedures for managing pain. As a result, patients with cancer may receive inadequate care for pain. The Cancer Pain-assessment Toolkit for Use in RoutinE oncology outpatient services aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre cluster-randomised trial of a systematic pain assessment and management programme integrated within routine care at UK NHS oncology outpatient services. This protocol describes an embedded process evaluation that aims to evaluate the acceptability, fidelity and implementation of the intervention and trial procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A combination of methods will be used in the process evaluation. Quantitative data on fidelity and intervention implementation will be collected using case report forms completed at sites, capturing details on training, intervention delivery and adherence. Qualitative data on acceptability and trial experience will be collected through semistructured interviews with intervention recipients (participants), intervention deliverers (healthcare professionals), research nurses and intervention champions. Researcher fieldnotes will also document trial acceptability throughout the trial. Quantitative data will be summarised descriptively. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis, guided by the framework of acceptability.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The trial received ethical approval from South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (21/HRA/5245). Site-specific approvals were obtained from the research and innovation offices at Leeds Teaching Hospital and Hull Teaching Hospital. Trial findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and via participating sites.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN86926298.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 6","pages":"e101935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability, fidelity and implementation of systematic integrated pain management in oncology outpatient services: a process evaluation protocol for a multicentre clustered randomised pilot trial.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Claire Robinson, Florence Day, Elaine G Boland, Michelle Collinson, Marie Fallon, Amanda Farrin, Kate Flemming, Sean Girvan, Sue Hartup, David Meads, Adam Hurlow, Catriona Mayland, John O'Dwyer, Simon Pini, Daniel Swinson, Suzanne H Richards, Matthew R Mulvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the UK National Health Service (NHS), most people with cancer are cared for at oncology outpatient services, where there are no standardised procedures for managing pain. As a result, patients with cancer may receive inadequate care for pain. The Cancer Pain-assessment Toolkit for Use in RoutinE oncology outpatient services aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre cluster-randomised trial of a systematic pain assessment and management programme integrated within routine care at UK NHS oncology outpatient services. This protocol describes an embedded process evaluation that aims to evaluate the acceptability, fidelity and implementation of the intervention and trial procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A combination of methods will be used in the process evaluation. Quantitative data on fidelity and intervention implementation will be collected using case report forms completed at sites, capturing details on training, intervention delivery and adherence. Qualitative data on acceptability and trial experience will be collected through semistructured interviews with intervention recipients (participants), intervention deliverers (healthcare professionals), research nurses and intervention champions. Researcher fieldnotes will also document trial acceptability throughout the trial. Quantitative data will be summarised descriptively. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis, guided by the framework of acceptability.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The trial received ethical approval from South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (21/HRA/5245). Site-specific approvals were obtained from the research and innovation offices at Leeds Teaching Hospital and Hull Teaching Hospital. Trial findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and via participating sites.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN86926298.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"e101935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101935\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)中,大多数癌症患者在肿瘤门诊接受治疗,在那里没有管理疼痛的标准化程序。因此,癌症患者可能没有得到足够的治疗。用于常规肿瘤门诊服务的癌症疼痛评估工具包旨在评估在英国NHS肿瘤门诊服务的常规护理中进行系统疼痛评估和管理计划的多中心集群随机试验的可行性。本协议描述了一个嵌入式过程评估,旨在评估干预和试验程序的可接受性、保真度和实施情况。方法与分析:在过程评价中将综合运用多种方法。将使用在现场填写的病例报告表收集保真度和干预措施实施情况的定量数据,包括培训、干预措施提供和遵守情况的细节。通过与干预接受者(参与者)、干预提供者(医疗保健专业人员)、研究护士和干预倡导者进行半结构化访谈,收集可接受性和试验经验的定性数据。研究者现场记录也将记录整个试验的可接受性。定量数据将作描述性总结。定性数据将在可接受性框架的指导下,采用专题分析进行分析。伦理和传播:该试验获得了南约克郡研究伦理委员会和卫生研究管理局(21/HRA/5245)的伦理批准。利兹教学医院和赫尔教学医院的研究和创新办公室获得了特定地点的批准。试验结果将通过同行评议出版物和参与网站传播。试验注册号:ISRCTN86926298。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability, fidelity and implementation of systematic integrated pain management in oncology outpatient services: a process evaluation protocol for a multicentre clustered randomised pilot trial.

Introduction: In the UK National Health Service (NHS), most people with cancer are cared for at oncology outpatient services, where there are no standardised procedures for managing pain. As a result, patients with cancer may receive inadequate care for pain. The Cancer Pain-assessment Toolkit for Use in RoutinE oncology outpatient services aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre cluster-randomised trial of a systematic pain assessment and management programme integrated within routine care at UK NHS oncology outpatient services. This protocol describes an embedded process evaluation that aims to evaluate the acceptability, fidelity and implementation of the intervention and trial procedures.

Methods and analysis: A combination of methods will be used in the process evaluation. Quantitative data on fidelity and intervention implementation will be collected using case report forms completed at sites, capturing details on training, intervention delivery and adherence. Qualitative data on acceptability and trial experience will be collected through semistructured interviews with intervention recipients (participants), intervention deliverers (healthcare professionals), research nurses and intervention champions. Researcher fieldnotes will also document trial acceptability throughout the trial. Quantitative data will be summarised descriptively. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis, guided by the framework of acceptability.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial received ethical approval from South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (21/HRA/5245). Site-specific approvals were obtained from the research and innovation offices at Leeds Teaching Hospital and Hull Teaching Hospital. Trial findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and via participating sites.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN86926298.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信