姑息医学中的皮下抗生素:回顾性图表回顾。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
John Curtin, Keith Eldridge, Mary-Elodine D'silva, Paul Howard
{"title":"姑息医学中的皮下抗生素:回顾性图表回顾。","authors":"John Curtin, Keith Eldridge, Mary-Elodine D'silva, Paul Howard","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the use and safety of subcutaneous (SC) antibiotics for infection and symptom control in the palliative setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of the use of SC antibiotics since it was introduced to our palliative care service 7 years ago. All records were examined to ascertain therapeutic aim and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SC antibiotics were administered to 87 patients (79% had cancer) on 112 occasions (for infection, 105/112, or symptom control, 7/112) in the inpatient hospice or home. 85% wanted to avoid hospitalisation and requested active treatment in situ. Reasons for SC rather than intravenous administration included venous fragility and lack of an available cannulator. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the most common antibiotic given. Of the occasions when treating for infection, the respiratory tract was the most common site; half survived beyond 21 days. Of those used for symptoms, antibiotics appeared helpful in 3/7. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 7/112 (<i>Clostridium difficile</i>, generalised rash or SC site problems in 1, 1 and 5/112, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SC antibiotics appear well tolerated in the palliative setting and could be a useful option in selected patients who want to avoid hospitalisation but receive active treatment in situ. Thus, we believe that further research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subcutaneous antibiotics in palliative medicine: Retrospective chart review.\",\"authors\":\"John Curtin, Keith Eldridge, Mary-Elodine D'silva, Paul Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2025-005676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the use and safety of subcutaneous (SC) antibiotics for infection and symptom control in the palliative setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of the use of SC antibiotics since it was introduced to our palliative care service 7 years ago. All records were examined to ascertain therapeutic aim and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SC antibiotics were administered to 87 patients (79% had cancer) on 112 occasions (for infection, 105/112, or symptom control, 7/112) in the inpatient hospice or home. 85% wanted to avoid hospitalisation and requested active treatment in situ. Reasons for SC rather than intravenous administration included venous fragility and lack of an available cannulator. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the most common antibiotic given. Of the occasions when treating for infection, the respiratory tract was the most common site; half survived beyond 21 days. Of those used for symptoms, antibiotics appeared helpful in 3/7. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 7/112 (<i>Clostridium difficile</i>, generalised rash or SC site problems in 1, 1 and 5/112, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SC antibiotics appear well tolerated in the palliative setting and could be a useful option in selected patients who want to avoid hospitalisation but receive active treatment in situ. Thus, we believe that further research is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005676\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨在姑息环境下皮下抗生素(SC)用于感染和症状控制的使用和安全性。方法:我们对SC抗生素自7年前引入姑息治疗服务以来的使用情况进行了回顾性图表回顾。检查所有记录以确定治疗目的和耐受性。结果:87例患者(79%为癌症患者)在住院安宁疗护或家中112次(感染105/112,或症状控制7/112)使用SC抗生素。85%的患者希望避免住院,并要求积极就地治疗。SC而不是静脉给药的原因包括静脉脆弱和缺乏可用的套管器。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦是最常用的抗生素。在治疗感染的场合中,呼吸道是最常见的部位;半数存活超过21天。在那些用于治疗症状的药物中,抗生素似乎在7 / 3起作用。不良事件导致7/112患者停药(分别为1例、1例和5例难辨梭菌、全身性皮疹或SC部位问题)。结论:SC抗生素在姑息治疗环境中表现出良好的耐受性,对于希望避免住院但接受原位积极治疗的特定患者可能是一种有用的选择。因此,我们认为有必要进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subcutaneous antibiotics in palliative medicine: Retrospective chart review.

Objectives: To investigate the use and safety of subcutaneous (SC) antibiotics for infection and symptom control in the palliative setting.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of the use of SC antibiotics since it was introduced to our palliative care service 7 years ago. All records were examined to ascertain therapeutic aim and tolerability.

Results: SC antibiotics were administered to 87 patients (79% had cancer) on 112 occasions (for infection, 105/112, or symptom control, 7/112) in the inpatient hospice or home. 85% wanted to avoid hospitalisation and requested active treatment in situ. Reasons for SC rather than intravenous administration included venous fragility and lack of an available cannulator. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the most common antibiotic given. Of the occasions when treating for infection, the respiratory tract was the most common site; half survived beyond 21 days. Of those used for symptoms, antibiotics appeared helpful in 3/7. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 7/112 (Clostridium difficile, generalised rash or SC site problems in 1, 1 and 5/112, respectively).

Conclusions: SC antibiotics appear well tolerated in the palliative setting and could be a useful option in selected patients who want to avoid hospitalisation but receive active treatment in situ. Thus, we believe that further research is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信