Alexander Herold , Wei-Ching Lo , Andrew Sharp , Barbara D. Wichtmann , Sean P. Hartmann , Arhaan Gupta-Rastogi , Lauren M. Melski , John Conklin , Min Lang , Bryan Clifford , Shivraman Giri , Michael Weber , James A. Brink , Oleg Pianykh , Onofrio A. Catalano , Susie Y. Huang , Jad S. Husseini
{"title":"增强MRI在肌肉骨骼检查中的效率:优化设备设计和工作流程优化的影响","authors":"Alexander Herold , Wei-Ching Lo , Andrew Sharp , Barbara D. Wichtmann , Sean P. Hartmann , Arhaan Gupta-Rastogi , Lauren M. Melski , John Conklin , Min Lang , Bryan Clifford , Shivraman Giri , Michael Weber , James A. Brink , Oleg Pianykh , Onofrio A. Catalano , Susie Y. Huang , Jad S. Husseini","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To assess the workflow efficiency of an optimized MRI facility design compared to conventional facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed 7,164 non-contrast MRI examinations (3,951 knee, 2,246 shoulder, 967 ankle) performed between January 2021 and April 2024. We compared an optimized facility (OF) featuring three scanners, three dedicated preparation bays, and dockable tables to two reference facilities (RF) with traditional single-scanner/single-table setups. All scans were performed on 3 T scanners. Workflow metrics were extracted from scanner logs and electronic health records. Three-way ANOVA and chi-square tests assessed the impact of facility design, body region, and date on workflow metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The OF demonstrated a decrease of the mean total process cycle by 5.0–6.8 min (16.4–18.9 %) compared to RF (p < 0.001), which was primarily attributed to reduced turnaround times (mean reduction: 4.2 min, p < 0.001). Scans incorporating deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction showed 4.9–6.2 min shorter mean acquisition times at both facilities (p < 0.001). The mean time interval from patient arrival to exam start was 6.6 min shorter at OF, and on-time performance was higher at OF (79.4 %) versus RF (63.4 %) (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates that optimized MRI facility design significantly enhances outpatient efficiency and increases patient throughput for non-contrast enhanced musculoskeletal examinations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing MRI efficiency in musculoskeletal examinations: Impact of optimized facility design and workflow optimization efforts\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Herold , Wei-Ching Lo , Andrew Sharp , Barbara D. Wichtmann , Sean P. Hartmann , Arhaan Gupta-Rastogi , Lauren M. Melski , John Conklin , Min Lang , Bryan Clifford , Shivraman Giri , Michael Weber , James A. Brink , Oleg Pianykh , Onofrio A. Catalano , Susie Y. Huang , Jad S. Husseini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To assess the workflow efficiency of an optimized MRI facility design compared to conventional facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed 7,164 non-contrast MRI examinations (3,951 knee, 2,246 shoulder, 967 ankle) performed between January 2021 and April 2024. We compared an optimized facility (OF) featuring three scanners, three dedicated preparation bays, and dockable tables to two reference facilities (RF) with traditional single-scanner/single-table setups. All scans were performed on 3 T scanners. Workflow metrics were extracted from scanner logs and electronic health records. Three-way ANOVA and chi-square tests assessed the impact of facility design, body region, and date on workflow metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The OF demonstrated a decrease of the mean total process cycle by 5.0–6.8 min (16.4–18.9 %) compared to RF (p < 0.001), which was primarily attributed to reduced turnaround times (mean reduction: 4.2 min, p < 0.001). Scans incorporating deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction showed 4.9–6.2 min shorter mean acquisition times at both facilities (p < 0.001). The mean time interval from patient arrival to exam start was 6.6 min shorter at OF, and on-time performance was higher at OF (79.4 %) versus RF (63.4 %) (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates that optimized MRI facility design significantly enhances outpatient efficiency and increases patient throughput for non-contrast enhanced musculoskeletal examinations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003493\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与传统设施相比,评估优化MRI设施设计的工作流程效率。方法回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年4月期间进行的7,164例非对比MRI检查(3,951例膝关节,2,246例肩部,967例踝关节)。我们将具有三个扫描仪、三个专用准备槽和可停靠表的优化设施(OF)与具有传统单扫描仪/单表设置的两个参考设施(RF)进行了比较。所有扫描均在3t扫描仪上进行。从扫描仪日志和电子健康记录中提取工作流度量。三向方差分析和卡方检验评估了设施设计、身体区域和日期对工作流程指标的影响。结果与RF相比,OF显示平均总工艺周期减少5.0-6.8 min (16.4 - 18.9%) (p <;0.001),这主要归因于周转时间的减少(平均减少:4.2分钟,p <;0.001)。结合深度学习(DL)重建的扫描显示,两个设施的平均采集时间缩短了4.9-6.2分钟(p <;0.001)。从患者到达到检查开始的平均时间间隔在OF组缩短了6.6分钟,并且OF组的准点率(79.4%)高于RF组(63.4%)(p <;0.001)。本研究表明,优化的MRI设备设计显著提高了门诊效率,增加了非对比增强肌肉骨骼检查的患者吞吐量。
Enhancing MRI efficiency in musculoskeletal examinations: Impact of optimized facility design and workflow optimization efforts
Background
To assess the workflow efficiency of an optimized MRI facility design compared to conventional facilities.
Methods
This retrospective study analyzed 7,164 non-contrast MRI examinations (3,951 knee, 2,246 shoulder, 967 ankle) performed between January 2021 and April 2024. We compared an optimized facility (OF) featuring three scanners, three dedicated preparation bays, and dockable tables to two reference facilities (RF) with traditional single-scanner/single-table setups. All scans were performed on 3 T scanners. Workflow metrics were extracted from scanner logs and electronic health records. Three-way ANOVA and chi-square tests assessed the impact of facility design, body region, and date on workflow metrics.
Results
The OF demonstrated a decrease of the mean total process cycle by 5.0–6.8 min (16.4–18.9 %) compared to RF (p < 0.001), which was primarily attributed to reduced turnaround times (mean reduction: 4.2 min, p < 0.001). Scans incorporating deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction showed 4.9–6.2 min shorter mean acquisition times at both facilities (p < 0.001). The mean time interval from patient arrival to exam start was 6.6 min shorter at OF, and on-time performance was higher at OF (79.4 %) versus RF (63.4 %) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that optimized MRI facility design significantly enhances outpatient efficiency and increases patient throughput for non-contrast enhanced musculoskeletal examinations.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.