量身定制的替代燃料信息:细分未来消费者对替代燃料相关信息和通信的偏好

Julia Offermann, Linda Engelmann, Martina Ziefle
{"title":"量身定制的替代燃料信息:细分未来消费者对替代燃料相关信息和通信的偏好","authors":"Julia Offermann,&nbsp;Linda Engelmann,&nbsp;Martina Ziefle","doi":"10.1016/j.jfueco.2025.100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing emissions in the mobility sector pose a significant challenge for modern society, contributing extensively to climate change. One promising approach to mitigating these emissions is the development of CO₂-based alternative fuels, which can reduce dependence on fossil fuels, such as gasoline and diesel, by capturing and reusing CO₂ emissions. While the technical feasibility of these fuels has been widely studied, limited research exists on consumer preferences regarding how information about alternative fuels is communicated. Understanding communication preferences is essential and critical for designing effective communication strategies that foster public acceptance and adoption, as they shape how individuals process information, form attitudes, and ultimately decide whether to adopt sustainable technologies. To address this gap, an online survey study (<em>N</em> = 215) was conducted to explore laypeople’s perceptions of alternative fuels, focusing on their information needs and communication preferences. The results revealed two distinct consumer clusters with differing expectations for content, channels, and trusted sources of information and communication. One group preferred detailed, science-based information from institutions, while the other favored accessible, practice-oriented content from industry or media. These findings emphasize the need for tailored communication strategies that reflect varying trust dynamics and information preferences. They offer practical guidance for policymakers and industry actors aiming to increase public engagement and acceptance of CO₂-based alternative fuels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100556,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Communications","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailored information on alternative fuels: Segmenting future consumers' preferences for information and communication related to alternative fuels\",\"authors\":\"Julia Offermann,&nbsp;Linda Engelmann,&nbsp;Martina Ziefle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfueco.2025.100146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Increasing emissions in the mobility sector pose a significant challenge for modern society, contributing extensively to climate change. One promising approach to mitigating these emissions is the development of CO₂-based alternative fuels, which can reduce dependence on fossil fuels, such as gasoline and diesel, by capturing and reusing CO₂ emissions. While the technical feasibility of these fuels has been widely studied, limited research exists on consumer preferences regarding how information about alternative fuels is communicated. Understanding communication preferences is essential and critical for designing effective communication strategies that foster public acceptance and adoption, as they shape how individuals process information, form attitudes, and ultimately decide whether to adopt sustainable technologies. To address this gap, an online survey study (<em>N</em> = 215) was conducted to explore laypeople’s perceptions of alternative fuels, focusing on their information needs and communication preferences. The results revealed two distinct consumer clusters with differing expectations for content, channels, and trusted sources of information and communication. One group preferred detailed, science-based information from institutions, while the other favored accessible, practice-oriented content from industry or media. These findings emphasize the need for tailored communication strategies that reflect varying trust dynamics and information preferences. They offer practical guidance for policymakers and industry actors aiming to increase public engagement and acceptance of CO₂-based alternative fuels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fuel Communications\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fuel Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052025000147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052025000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通行业不断增加的排放对现代社会构成了重大挑战,对气候变化产生了广泛影响。减少这些排放的一个有希望的方法是开发以二氧化碳为基础的替代燃料,这种燃料可以通过捕获和再利用二氧化碳排放来减少对汽油和柴油等化石燃料的依赖。虽然已对这些燃料的技术可行性进行了广泛的研究,但关于如何传达替代燃料的信息的消费者偏好的研究有限。了解传播偏好对于设计有效的传播策略至关重要,因为它们决定了个人如何处理信息,形成态度,并最终决定是否采用可持续技术,从而促进公众接受和采用。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项在线调查研究(N = 215),以探讨外行人对替代燃料的看法,重点关注他们的信息需求和沟通偏好。结果显示,两种不同的消费者群体对内容、渠道、可信赖的信息和沟通来源有着不同的期望。一组更喜欢来自机构的详细的、基于科学的信息,而另一组更喜欢来自行业或媒体的可访问的、以实践为导向的内容。这些发现强调需要量身定制的沟通策略,以反映不同的信任动态和信息偏好。它们为决策者和行业参与者提供了实用指导,旨在提高公众对二氧化碳替代燃料的参与度和接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tailored information on alternative fuels: Segmenting future consumers' preferences for information and communication related to alternative fuels

Tailored information on alternative fuels: Segmenting future consumers' preferences for information and communication related to alternative fuels
Increasing emissions in the mobility sector pose a significant challenge for modern society, contributing extensively to climate change. One promising approach to mitigating these emissions is the development of CO₂-based alternative fuels, which can reduce dependence on fossil fuels, such as gasoline and diesel, by capturing and reusing CO₂ emissions. While the technical feasibility of these fuels has been widely studied, limited research exists on consumer preferences regarding how information about alternative fuels is communicated. Understanding communication preferences is essential and critical for designing effective communication strategies that foster public acceptance and adoption, as they shape how individuals process information, form attitudes, and ultimately decide whether to adopt sustainable technologies. To address this gap, an online survey study (N = 215) was conducted to explore laypeople’s perceptions of alternative fuels, focusing on their information needs and communication preferences. The results revealed two distinct consumer clusters with differing expectations for content, channels, and trusted sources of information and communication. One group preferred detailed, science-based information from institutions, while the other favored accessible, practice-oriented content from industry or media. These findings emphasize the need for tailored communication strategies that reflect varying trust dynamics and information preferences. They offer practical guidance for policymakers and industry actors aiming to increase public engagement and acceptance of CO₂-based alternative fuels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信