心理模型问卷框架的开发:一种测量自动驾驶中心理模型的系统方法

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Stephanie Seupke, Sarukan Segar, Martin Baumann
{"title":"心理模型问卷框架的开发:一种测量自动驾驶中心理模型的系统方法","authors":"Stephanie Seupke,&nbsp;Sarukan Segar,&nbsp;Martin Baumann","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems evolve, new technologies are regularly introduced to the market. These technologies often differ significantly in operational functionality, communication methods, and limitations, even within the same SAE automation level. These variations can have critical safety implications, which highlight the importance of accurately assessing users’ mental models to identify potential safety gaps and optimize product communication strategies. While existing mental model questionnaires provide valuable insights, their applicability is often restricted to specific automation levels and system versions and are therefore limited in their use across diverse systems. This paper addresses this limitation by presenting a flexible questionnaire framework designed to assess users’ mental models across different levels of automation. For this purpose, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to systematically extract key information relevant to system usage from user manuals of SAE Level 2 and Level 3 automated systems. These insights guided the development of a questionnaire structure that is adaptable to the specifications of individual systems. Example items for Level 2 and Level 3 systems were created and validated through expert review (n = 4) and a quantitative online study (n = 1023). The results confirm that the proposed framework provides a valid and adaptable tool for designing mental model questionnaires tailored to specific systems, facilitating consistent assessment and comparison of system understanding across diverse automated driving technologies. This framework represents a significant step toward improving the evaluation of user interaction with automated systems and supporting the safe implementation of these technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 686-700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a mental model questionnaire framework: a systematic approach to measuring mental models in automated driving\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Seupke,&nbsp;Sarukan Segar,&nbsp;Martin Baumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems evolve, new technologies are regularly introduced to the market. These technologies often differ significantly in operational functionality, communication methods, and limitations, even within the same SAE automation level. These variations can have critical safety implications, which highlight the importance of accurately assessing users’ mental models to identify potential safety gaps and optimize product communication strategies. While existing mental model questionnaires provide valuable insights, their applicability is often restricted to specific automation levels and system versions and are therefore limited in their use across diverse systems. This paper addresses this limitation by presenting a flexible questionnaire framework designed to assess users’ mental models across different levels of automation. For this purpose, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to systematically extract key information relevant to system usage from user manuals of SAE Level 2 and Level 3 automated systems. These insights guided the development of a questionnaire structure that is adaptable to the specifications of individual systems. Example items for Level 2 and Level 3 systems were created and validated through expert review (n = 4) and a quantitative online study (n = 1023). The results confirm that the proposed framework provides a valid and adaptable tool for designing mental model questionnaires tailored to specific systems, facilitating consistent assessment and comparison of system understanding across diverse automated driving technologies. This framework represents a significant step toward improving the evaluation of user interaction with automated systems and supporting the safe implementation of these technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 686-700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着先进驾驶辅助系统的发展,新技术定期被引入市场。即使在相同的SAE自动化级别中,这些技术通常在操作功能、通信方法和限制方面存在显著差异。这些变化可能具有关键的安全含义,这突出了准确评估用户心理模型以识别潜在安全漏洞和优化产品沟通策略的重要性。虽然现有的心智模型调查问卷提供了有价值的见解,但它们的适用性通常仅限于特定的自动化级别和系统版本,因此在跨不同系统的使用中受到限制。本文通过提出一个灵活的问卷框架来解决这一限制,该框架旨在评估不同自动化水平的用户心理模型。为此,进行定性内容分析,系统地从SAE 2级和3级自动化系统的用户手册中提取与系统使用相关的关键信息。这些见解指导了问卷结构的开发,该结构可适应个别系统的规范。2级和3级系统的示例项目通过专家评审(n = 4)和定量在线研究(n = 1023)创建并验证。结果证实,所提出的框架为设计针对特定系统的心理模型问卷提供了一种有效且适应性强的工具,有助于对不同自动驾驶技术的系统理解进行一致的评估和比较。该框架代表了朝着改进用户与自动化系统交互的评估和支持这些技术的安全实现迈出的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a mental model questionnaire framework: a systematic approach to measuring mental models in automated driving
As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems evolve, new technologies are regularly introduced to the market. These technologies often differ significantly in operational functionality, communication methods, and limitations, even within the same SAE automation level. These variations can have critical safety implications, which highlight the importance of accurately assessing users’ mental models to identify potential safety gaps and optimize product communication strategies. While existing mental model questionnaires provide valuable insights, their applicability is often restricted to specific automation levels and system versions and are therefore limited in their use across diverse systems. This paper addresses this limitation by presenting a flexible questionnaire framework designed to assess users’ mental models across different levels of automation. For this purpose, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to systematically extract key information relevant to system usage from user manuals of SAE Level 2 and Level 3 automated systems. These insights guided the development of a questionnaire structure that is adaptable to the specifications of individual systems. Example items for Level 2 and Level 3 systems were created and validated through expert review (n = 4) and a quantitative online study (n = 1023). The results confirm that the proposed framework provides a valid and adaptable tool for designing mental model questionnaires tailored to specific systems, facilitating consistent assessment and comparison of system understanding across diverse automated driving technologies. This framework represents a significant step toward improving the evaluation of user interaction with automated systems and supporting the safe implementation of these technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信