{"title":"心理模型问卷框架的开发:一种测量自动驾驶中心理模型的系统方法","authors":"Stephanie Seupke, Sarukan Segar, Martin Baumann","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems evolve, new technologies are regularly introduced to the market. These technologies often differ significantly in operational functionality, communication methods, and limitations, even within the same SAE automation level. These variations can have critical safety implications, which highlight the importance of accurately assessing users’ mental models to identify potential safety gaps and optimize product communication strategies. While existing mental model questionnaires provide valuable insights, their applicability is often restricted to specific automation levels and system versions and are therefore limited in their use across diverse systems. This paper addresses this limitation by presenting a flexible questionnaire framework designed to assess users’ mental models across different levels of automation. For this purpose, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to systematically extract key information relevant to system usage from user manuals of SAE Level 2 and Level 3 automated systems. These insights guided the development of a questionnaire structure that is adaptable to the specifications of individual systems. Example items for Level 2 and Level 3 systems were created and validated through expert review (n = 4) and a quantitative online study (n = 1023). The results confirm that the proposed framework provides a valid and adaptable tool for designing mental model questionnaires tailored to specific systems, facilitating consistent assessment and comparison of system understanding across diverse automated driving technologies. This framework represents a significant step toward improving the evaluation of user interaction with automated systems and supporting the safe implementation of these technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 686-700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a mental model questionnaire framework: a systematic approach to measuring mental models in automated driving\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Seupke, Sarukan Segar, Martin Baumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems evolve, new technologies are regularly introduced to the market. These technologies often differ significantly in operational functionality, communication methods, and limitations, even within the same SAE automation level. These variations can have critical safety implications, which highlight the importance of accurately assessing users’ mental models to identify potential safety gaps and optimize product communication strategies. While existing mental model questionnaires provide valuable insights, their applicability is often restricted to specific automation levels and system versions and are therefore limited in their use across diverse systems. This paper addresses this limitation by presenting a flexible questionnaire framework designed to assess users’ mental models across different levels of automation. For this purpose, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to systematically extract key information relevant to system usage from user manuals of SAE Level 2 and Level 3 automated systems. These insights guided the development of a questionnaire structure that is adaptable to the specifications of individual systems. Example items for Level 2 and Level 3 systems were created and validated through expert review (n = 4) and a quantitative online study (n = 1023). The results confirm that the proposed framework provides a valid and adaptable tool for designing mental model questionnaires tailored to specific systems, facilitating consistent assessment and comparison of system understanding across diverse automated driving technologies. This framework represents a significant step toward improving the evaluation of user interaction with automated systems and supporting the safe implementation of these technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 686-700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a mental model questionnaire framework: a systematic approach to measuring mental models in automated driving
As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems evolve, new technologies are regularly introduced to the market. These technologies often differ significantly in operational functionality, communication methods, and limitations, even within the same SAE automation level. These variations can have critical safety implications, which highlight the importance of accurately assessing users’ mental models to identify potential safety gaps and optimize product communication strategies. While existing mental model questionnaires provide valuable insights, their applicability is often restricted to specific automation levels and system versions and are therefore limited in their use across diverse systems. This paper addresses this limitation by presenting a flexible questionnaire framework designed to assess users’ mental models across different levels of automation. For this purpose, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to systematically extract key information relevant to system usage from user manuals of SAE Level 2 and Level 3 automated systems. These insights guided the development of a questionnaire structure that is adaptable to the specifications of individual systems. Example items for Level 2 and Level 3 systems were created and validated through expert review (n = 4) and a quantitative online study (n = 1023). The results confirm that the proposed framework provides a valid and adaptable tool for designing mental model questionnaires tailored to specific systems, facilitating consistent assessment and comparison of system understanding across diverse automated driving technologies. This framework represents a significant step toward improving the evaluation of user interaction with automated systems and supporting the safe implementation of these technologies.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.