扰频器治疗慢性神经性疼痛的疗效:两两和剂量反应荟萃分析。

Mohamed S I Mohamed, Lama Alkahlout, Salma Elgamal, Amna Mohiuddin, Talal Al-Sayed, Hamad Al-Marri, Fatima Zahid, Daniela Martínez-Magallanes, Felipe Fregni, Suhail A R Doi, Abdallah M Abdallah, Omran A H Musa, Muhammad Naseem Khan, Giridhara R Babu
{"title":"扰频器治疗慢性神经性疼痛的疗效:两两和剂量反应荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohamed S I Mohamed, Lama Alkahlout, Salma Elgamal, Amna Mohiuddin, Talal Al-Sayed, Hamad Al-Marri, Fatima Zahid, Daniela Martínez-Magallanes, Felipe Fregni, Suhail A R Doi, Abdallah M Abdallah, Omran A H Musa, Muhammad Naseem Khan, Giridhara R Babu","doi":"10.4103/bnm.bnm_20_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) affects 7% of the world's population and is challenging to control since existing medications are inadequate and have negative effects. Electro-cutaneous devices, such as Scrambler Therapy (ST), have emerged as a possible option and have shown promising results in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the long-term efficacy of ST remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ST in CNP reduction over time. We used the data sources including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to September 2023. Five placebo and three routine-care controlled RCTs were selected among the screened abstracts. Two authors independently extracted the data. Data was pooled using a model under the common parameters assumption. The studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the MethodologicAl STandard for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale. The primary outcome measure was pain reduction; pain was converted to a common 0 to 10 scale, and a weighted mean difference of more than 2 points on a 10-point pain scale was considered clinically important. Eight RCTs that evaluated the effect of ST on CNP were included, with a total sample size of 350 participants. None of the participants withdrew in all these trials owing to adverse events or lack of efficacy. There was high-quality evidence that ST reduced pain in the short term, with a mean difference of -3 points. The dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores post-treatment, with a peak reduction at day 40. The effect of ST remained below the baseline values for 90 days, although with limited certainty. This study is the first dose-response meta-analysis to assess the duration of efficacy of ST in the treatment of CNP. The results demonstrated a clinically significant and more sustained reduction in pain created by ST compared to conventional treatments. Our findings indicate that ST could be used as a safe and effective alternative for managing CNP.</p>","PeriodicalId":93737,"journal":{"name":"Brain network and modulation","volume":"3 3","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12201973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of scrambler therapy in chronic neuropathic pain: pairwise and dose-response meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed S I Mohamed, Lama Alkahlout, Salma Elgamal, Amna Mohiuddin, Talal Al-Sayed, Hamad Al-Marri, Fatima Zahid, Daniela Martínez-Magallanes, Felipe Fregni, Suhail A R Doi, Abdallah M Abdallah, Omran A H Musa, Muhammad Naseem Khan, Giridhara R Babu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bnm.bnm_20_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) affects 7% of the world's population and is challenging to control since existing medications are inadequate and have negative effects. Electro-cutaneous devices, such as Scrambler Therapy (ST), have emerged as a possible option and have shown promising results in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the long-term efficacy of ST remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ST in CNP reduction over time. We used the data sources including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to September 2023. Five placebo and three routine-care controlled RCTs were selected among the screened abstracts. Two authors independently extracted the data. Data was pooled using a model under the common parameters assumption. The studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the MethodologicAl STandard for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale. The primary outcome measure was pain reduction; pain was converted to a common 0 to 10 scale, and a weighted mean difference of more than 2 points on a 10-point pain scale was considered clinically important. Eight RCTs that evaluated the effect of ST on CNP were included, with a total sample size of 350 participants. None of the participants withdrew in all these trials owing to adverse events or lack of efficacy. There was high-quality evidence that ST reduced pain in the short term, with a mean difference of -3 points. The dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores post-treatment, with a peak reduction at day 40. The effect of ST remained below the baseline values for 90 days, although with limited certainty. This study is the first dose-response meta-analysis to assess the duration of efficacy of ST in the treatment of CNP. The results demonstrated a clinically significant and more sustained reduction in pain created by ST compared to conventional treatments. Our findings indicate that ST could be used as a safe and effective alternative for managing CNP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain network and modulation\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"63-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12201973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain network and modulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bnm.bnm_20_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain network and modulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bnm.bnm_20_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性神经性疼痛(CNP)影响全球7%的人口,由于现有药物不足且具有负面影响,因此难以控制。电子皮肤装置,如扰频器疗法(ST),已经成为一种可能的选择,并在多个随机对照试验(rct)中显示出令人鼓舞的结果。然而,ST的长期疗效尚不清楚。我们的目的是随着时间的推移评估ST对CNP减少的疗效。我们使用的数据来源包括PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials从成立到2023年9月。从筛选的摘要中选择5个安慰剂对照试验和3个常规对照试验。两位作者独立提取了这些数据。采用共同参数假设下的模型进行数据池化。采用流行病学研究方法标准(MASTER)量表对研究的方法学质量进行评价。主要结局指标为疼痛减轻;疼痛被转换为普通的0到10分,在10分的疼痛量表中,加权平均差异大于2分被认为具有临床重要性。纳入了8项评估ST对CNP影响的随机对照试验,总样本量为350名参与者。没有参与者因不良事件或缺乏疗效而退出所有这些试验。有高质量的证据表明,ST在短期内减轻了疼痛,平均差值为-3分。剂量反应荟萃分析显示,治疗后疼痛评分显著降低,在第40天达到峰值。ST的影响在90天内保持在基线值以下,尽管确定性有限。这项研究是第一个评估ST治疗CNP疗效持续时间的剂量-反应荟萃分析。结果表明,与传统治疗相比,ST治疗对疼痛的缓解具有临床意义和更持久的效果。我们的研究结果表明,ST可以作为一种安全有效的治疗CNP的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of scrambler therapy in chronic neuropathic pain: pairwise and dose-response meta-analysis.

Chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) affects 7% of the world's population and is challenging to control since existing medications are inadequate and have negative effects. Electro-cutaneous devices, such as Scrambler Therapy (ST), have emerged as a possible option and have shown promising results in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the long-term efficacy of ST remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ST in CNP reduction over time. We used the data sources including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to September 2023. Five placebo and three routine-care controlled RCTs were selected among the screened abstracts. Two authors independently extracted the data. Data was pooled using a model under the common parameters assumption. The studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the MethodologicAl STandard for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale. The primary outcome measure was pain reduction; pain was converted to a common 0 to 10 scale, and a weighted mean difference of more than 2 points on a 10-point pain scale was considered clinically important. Eight RCTs that evaluated the effect of ST on CNP were included, with a total sample size of 350 participants. None of the participants withdrew in all these trials owing to adverse events or lack of efficacy. There was high-quality evidence that ST reduced pain in the short term, with a mean difference of -3 points. The dose-response meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores post-treatment, with a peak reduction at day 40. The effect of ST remained below the baseline values for 90 days, although with limited certainty. This study is the first dose-response meta-analysis to assess the duration of efficacy of ST in the treatment of CNP. The results demonstrated a clinically significant and more sustained reduction in pain created by ST compared to conventional treatments. Our findings indicate that ST could be used as a safe and effective alternative for managing CNP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信