基于深度学习分割的胫骨植入物松动检测自动化。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
C Magg, M A Ter Wee, G S Buijs, A J Kievit, M U Schafroth, J G G Dobbe, G J Streekstra, C I Sánchez, L Blankevoort
{"title":"基于深度学习分割的胫骨植入物松动检测自动化。","authors":"C Magg, M A Ter Wee, G S Buijs, A J Kievit, M U Schafroth, J G G Dobbe, G J Streekstra, C I Sánchez, L Blankevoort","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03459-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with recurrent complaints after total knee arthroplasty may suffer from aseptic implant loosening. Current imaging modalities do not quantify looseness of knee arthroplasty components. A recently developed and validated workflow quantifies the tibial component displacement relative to the bone from CT scans acquired under valgus and varus load. The 3D analysis approach includes segmentation and registration of the tibial component and bone. In the current approach, the semi-automatic segmentation requires user interaction, adding complexity to the analysis. The research question is whether the segmentation step can be fully automated while keeping outcomes indifferent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, different deep-learning (DL) models for fully automatic segmentation are proposed and evaluated. For this, we employ three different datasets for model development (20 cadaveric CT pairs and 10 cadaveric CT scans) and evaluation (72 patient CT pairs). Based on the performance on the development dataset, the final model was selected, and its predictions replaced the semi-automatic segmentation in the current approach. Implant displacement was quantified by the rotation about the screw-axis, maximum total point motion, and mean target registration error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The displacement parameters of the proposed approach showed a statistically significant difference between fixed and loose samples in a cadaver dataset, as well as between asymptomatic and loose samples in a patient dataset, similar to the outcomes of the current approach. The methodological error calculated on a reproducibility dataset showed values that were not statistically significant different between the two approaches. The results of the proposed and current approaches showed excellent reliability for one and three operators on two datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusion is that a full automation in knee implant displacement assessment is feasible by utilizing a DL-based segmentation model while maintaining the capability of distinguishing between fixed and loose implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2065-2073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automation in tibial implant loosening detection using deep-learning segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"C Magg, M A Ter Wee, G S Buijs, A J Kievit, M U Schafroth, J G G Dobbe, G J Streekstra, C I Sánchez, L Blankevoort\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11548-025-03459-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with recurrent complaints after total knee arthroplasty may suffer from aseptic implant loosening. Current imaging modalities do not quantify looseness of knee arthroplasty components. A recently developed and validated workflow quantifies the tibial component displacement relative to the bone from CT scans acquired under valgus and varus load. The 3D analysis approach includes segmentation and registration of the tibial component and bone. In the current approach, the semi-automatic segmentation requires user interaction, adding complexity to the analysis. The research question is whether the segmentation step can be fully automated while keeping outcomes indifferent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, different deep-learning (DL) models for fully automatic segmentation are proposed and evaluated. For this, we employ three different datasets for model development (20 cadaveric CT pairs and 10 cadaveric CT scans) and evaluation (72 patient CT pairs). Based on the performance on the development dataset, the final model was selected, and its predictions replaced the semi-automatic segmentation in the current approach. Implant displacement was quantified by the rotation about the screw-axis, maximum total point motion, and mean target registration error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The displacement parameters of the proposed approach showed a statistically significant difference between fixed and loose samples in a cadaver dataset, as well as between asymptomatic and loose samples in a patient dataset, similar to the outcomes of the current approach. The methodological error calculated on a reproducibility dataset showed values that were not statistically significant different between the two approaches. The results of the proposed and current approaches showed excellent reliability for one and three operators on two datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusion is that a full automation in knee implant displacement assessment is feasible by utilizing a DL-based segmentation model while maintaining the capability of distinguishing between fixed and loose implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2065-2073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518389/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03459-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03459-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全膝关节置换术后复发的患者可能会出现无菌假体松动。目前的成像方式不能量化膝关节置换术部件的松动程度。最近开发并验证了一种工作流程,通过外翻和内翻载荷下获得的CT扫描来量化胫骨部件相对于骨骼的位移。三维分析方法包括胫骨和骨的分割和配准。在目前的方法中,半自动分割需要用户交互,增加了分析的复杂性。研究的问题是分割步骤是否可以完全自动化,同时保持结果无关紧要。方法:在本研究中,提出并评估了用于全自动分割的不同深度学习(DL)模型。为此,我们采用三种不同的数据集进行模型开发(20对尸体CT和10对尸体CT扫描)和评估(72对患者CT)。基于在开发数据集上的表现,选择了最终模型,其预测取代了目前方法中的半自动分割。通过围绕螺钉轴的旋转,最大总点运动和平均目标配准误差来量化种植体位移。结果:该方法的位移参数在尸体数据集中的固定样本和松散样本之间,以及在患者数据集中的无症状样本和松散样本之间显示具有统计学意义的差异,与当前方法的结果相似。在可重复性数据集上计算的方法学误差显示,两种方法之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结果表明,本文提出的方法和现有的方法在两个数据集上对一个算子和三个算子具有良好的可靠性。结论:结论是,在保持区分固定假体和松动假体的能力的同时,利用基于dl的分割模型,完全自动化膝关节假体位移评估是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Automation in tibial implant loosening detection using deep-learning segmentation.

Automation in tibial implant loosening detection using deep-learning segmentation.

Automation in tibial implant loosening detection using deep-learning segmentation.

Automation in tibial implant loosening detection using deep-learning segmentation.

Purpose: Patients with recurrent complaints after total knee arthroplasty may suffer from aseptic implant loosening. Current imaging modalities do not quantify looseness of knee arthroplasty components. A recently developed and validated workflow quantifies the tibial component displacement relative to the bone from CT scans acquired under valgus and varus load. The 3D analysis approach includes segmentation and registration of the tibial component and bone. In the current approach, the semi-automatic segmentation requires user interaction, adding complexity to the analysis. The research question is whether the segmentation step can be fully automated while keeping outcomes indifferent.

Methods: In this study, different deep-learning (DL) models for fully automatic segmentation are proposed and evaluated. For this, we employ three different datasets for model development (20 cadaveric CT pairs and 10 cadaveric CT scans) and evaluation (72 patient CT pairs). Based on the performance on the development dataset, the final model was selected, and its predictions replaced the semi-automatic segmentation in the current approach. Implant displacement was quantified by the rotation about the screw-axis, maximum total point motion, and mean target registration error.

Results: The displacement parameters of the proposed approach showed a statistically significant difference between fixed and loose samples in a cadaver dataset, as well as between asymptomatic and loose samples in a patient dataset, similar to the outcomes of the current approach. The methodological error calculated on a reproducibility dataset showed values that were not statistically significant different between the two approaches. The results of the proposed and current approaches showed excellent reliability for one and three operators on two datasets.

Conclusion: The conclusion is that a full automation in knee implant displacement assessment is feasible by utilizing a DL-based segmentation model while maintaining the capability of distinguishing between fixed and loose implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信