Andreas Hess, Koray Tascilar, Hanna M Schenker, Laura Konerth, Verena Schönau, Marina Sergeeva, Silke Kreitz, Jutta Prade, Sandra Strobelt, Mageshwar Selvakumar, Arnd Kleyer, Matthias Englbrecht, Axel J Hueber, Mario M Zaiss, Eugen Feist, Gerd R Burmester, Reinhard E Voll, Stephanie Finzel, Christoph Baerwald, Julie Rösch, Frank Behrens, Michaela Koehm, Jose Antonio P da Silva, Nemanja Damjanov, Arnd Dörfler, Georg Schett, Jürgen Rech
{"title":"疾病相关脑激活预测类风湿关节炎患者对TNF抑制的临床反应(precpra):一项随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期研究。","authors":"Andreas Hess, Koray Tascilar, Hanna M Schenker, Laura Konerth, Verena Schönau, Marina Sergeeva, Silke Kreitz, Jutta Prade, Sandra Strobelt, Mageshwar Selvakumar, Arnd Kleyer, Matthias Englbrecht, Axel J Hueber, Mario M Zaiss, Eugen Feist, Gerd R Burmester, Reinhard E Voll, Stephanie Finzel, Christoph Baerwald, Julie Rösch, Frank Behrens, Michaela Koehm, Jose Antonio P da Silva, Nemanja Damjanov, Arnd Dörfler, Georg Schett, Jürgen Rech","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00032-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory disease frequently treated with TNF inhibitors. Little is known about predictors of response to TNF inhibitors. Because clinical response in rheumatoid arthritis is measured by composite scores containing subjective patient-orientated domains (eg, pain and global disease perception), we hypothesised that patients with high disease representation in the CNS might respond better to TNF inhibitors than patients with less CNS disease representation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomised trial in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis at six rheumatology centres across Germany, Portugal, and Serbia. All patients had a functional MRI (fMRI) brain scan at baseline to measure CNS pain activation. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with active rheumatoid arthritis who have active disease despite the use of at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were stratified according to fMRI (high volume or low volume) and were randomly assigned 2:1 using a randomisation list generated by a study statistician to treatment with the TNF inhibitor certolizumab pegol (400 mg subcutaneously on weeks 0, 2, and 4, and 200 mg once every 2 weeks for maximum 24 weeks) or placebo. Patients and clinicians were masked to allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching low disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints ≤3·2) at week 12, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. There was no lived experience involvement in study design. The study was registered with EudraCT (2013-000337-13) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01864265).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Sept 3, 2013, and Jan 10, 2020, 148 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were screened and 139 (99 [71%] women and 40 [29%] men) were randomly assigned to the high-volume certolizumab pegol group (n=49), the low-volume certolizumab pegol group (n=43), or the placebo group (n=47). Low disease activity was reached by 28 (57%) in the high-volume certolizumab pegol group, 19 (44%) in the low-volume certolizumab pegol group, and 12 (26%) in the placebo group at week 12. Response in the high-volume certolizumab pegol group was significantly different (p=0·0017) to the placebo group, but not the low-volume certolizumab pegol group (p=0·063). There were 25 treatment-related adverse events: 22 in the certolizumab pegol groups and three in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>High disease-associated fMRI CNS pain activation might predict clinical response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis to TNF inhibitor treatment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>UCB Biopharma.</p>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease-associated brain activation predicts clinical response to TNF inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis (PreCePra): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Hess, Koray Tascilar, Hanna M Schenker, Laura Konerth, Verena Schönau, Marina Sergeeva, Silke Kreitz, Jutta Prade, Sandra Strobelt, Mageshwar Selvakumar, Arnd Kleyer, Matthias Englbrecht, Axel J Hueber, Mario M Zaiss, Eugen Feist, Gerd R Burmester, Reinhard E Voll, Stephanie Finzel, Christoph Baerwald, Julie Rösch, Frank Behrens, Michaela Koehm, Jose Antonio P da Silva, Nemanja Damjanov, Arnd Dörfler, Georg Schett, Jürgen Rech\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00032-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory disease frequently treated with TNF inhibitors. Little is known about predictors of response to TNF inhibitors. Because clinical response in rheumatoid arthritis is measured by composite scores containing subjective patient-orientated domains (eg, pain and global disease perception), we hypothesised that patients with high disease representation in the CNS might respond better to TNF inhibitors than patients with less CNS disease representation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomised trial in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis at six rheumatology centres across Germany, Portugal, and Serbia. All patients had a functional MRI (fMRI) brain scan at baseline to measure CNS pain activation. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with active rheumatoid arthritis who have active disease despite the use of at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were stratified according to fMRI (high volume or low volume) and were randomly assigned 2:1 using a randomisation list generated by a study statistician to treatment with the TNF inhibitor certolizumab pegol (400 mg subcutaneously on weeks 0, 2, and 4, and 200 mg once every 2 weeks for maximum 24 weeks) or placebo. Patients and clinicians were masked to allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching low disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints ≤3·2) at week 12, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. There was no lived experience involvement in study design. The study was registered with EudraCT (2013-000337-13) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01864265).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Sept 3, 2013, and Jan 10, 2020, 148 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were screened and 139 (99 [71%] women and 40 [29%] men) were randomly assigned to the high-volume certolizumab pegol group (n=49), the low-volume certolizumab pegol group (n=43), or the placebo group (n=47). Low disease activity was reached by 28 (57%) in the high-volume certolizumab pegol group, 19 (44%) in the low-volume certolizumab pegol group, and 12 (26%) in the placebo group at week 12. Response in the high-volume certolizumab pegol group was significantly different (p=0·0017) to the placebo group, but not the low-volume certolizumab pegol group (p=0·063). There were 25 treatment-related adverse events: 22 in the certolizumab pegol groups and three in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>High disease-associated fMRI CNS pain activation might predict clinical response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis to TNF inhibitor treatment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>UCB Biopharma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00032-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00032-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disease-associated brain activation predicts clinical response to TNF inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis (PreCePra): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory disease frequently treated with TNF inhibitors. Little is known about predictors of response to TNF inhibitors. Because clinical response in rheumatoid arthritis is measured by composite scores containing subjective patient-orientated domains (eg, pain and global disease perception), we hypothesised that patients with high disease representation in the CNS might respond better to TNF inhibitors than patients with less CNS disease representation.
Methods: We did a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomised trial in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis at six rheumatology centres across Germany, Portugal, and Serbia. All patients had a functional MRI (fMRI) brain scan at baseline to measure CNS pain activation. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with active rheumatoid arthritis who have active disease despite the use of at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were stratified according to fMRI (high volume or low volume) and were randomly assigned 2:1 using a randomisation list generated by a study statistician to treatment with the TNF inhibitor certolizumab pegol (400 mg subcutaneously on weeks 0, 2, and 4, and 200 mg once every 2 weeks for maximum 24 weeks) or placebo. Patients and clinicians were masked to allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching low disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints ≤3·2) at week 12, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. There was no lived experience involvement in study design. The study was registered with EudraCT (2013-000337-13) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01864265).
Findings: Between Sept 3, 2013, and Jan 10, 2020, 148 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were screened and 139 (99 [71%] women and 40 [29%] men) were randomly assigned to the high-volume certolizumab pegol group (n=49), the low-volume certolizumab pegol group (n=43), or the placebo group (n=47). Low disease activity was reached by 28 (57%) in the high-volume certolizumab pegol group, 19 (44%) in the low-volume certolizumab pegol group, and 12 (26%) in the placebo group at week 12. Response in the high-volume certolizumab pegol group was significantly different (p=0·0017) to the placebo group, but not the low-volume certolizumab pegol group (p=0·063). There were 25 treatment-related adverse events: 22 in the certolizumab pegol groups and three in the placebo group.
Interpretation: High disease-associated fMRI CNS pain activation might predict clinical response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis to TNF inhibitor treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials.
With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.