职教学生及教职员参与公民教育发展促进学生发声:参与式行动研究。

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Journal of Educational Change Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s10833-024-09523-y
Esther M A Geurts, Rianne P Reijs, Hélène H M Leenders, Maria W J Jansen, Christian J P A Hoebe
{"title":"职教学生及教职员参与公民教育发展促进学生发声:参与式行动研究。","authors":"Esther M A Geurts, Rianne P Reijs, Hélène H M Leenders, Maria W J Jansen, Christian J P A Hoebe","doi":"10.1007/s10833-024-09523-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite decades of school improvement efforts, maintaining lasting change in schools remains challenging. So far, traditional interventions have been unsuccessful in recognising schools' unique and complex contexts, which is why a shift towards a more reciprocal, emergent, and contextualised approach is necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim is to develop citizenship education with students and staff in vocational education and training (VET), which increases student voice and fits the complex school system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We involved students and staff in citizenship education development and identified relevant factors that influenced this process. This participatory action research (PAR) study used a retrospective design assessing logbook entries, observations, interviews, and focus group discussions collected between September 2020 and September 2023 in four study programmes from one VET institution in the Netherlands. Thematic analysis was used to code the datasources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collaboration between students and staff flourished while using the curriculum negotiation tool. Relevant factors influencing the process were: alignment between project and participants' priorities and goals, receptivity to student and teacher voices, leadership engagement, and tensions and intentions about roles and responsibilities between participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasises the promise of involving students and staff in educational development. When teachers startedworking collaboratively with students, many of their initial doubts decreased, which led to renewed motivation for becoming student voice advocates. PAR has the potential of starkly disrupting the existing status quo and breaking through ingrained patterns within complex systems to ensure influence for students from all levels of education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Change","volume":"26 2","pages":"271-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting student voice by involving vocational education students and staff in citizenship education development: a participatory action research study.\",\"authors\":\"Esther M A Geurts, Rianne P Reijs, Hélène H M Leenders, Maria W J Jansen, Christian J P A Hoebe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10833-024-09523-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite decades of school improvement efforts, maintaining lasting change in schools remains challenging. So far, traditional interventions have been unsuccessful in recognising schools' unique and complex contexts, which is why a shift towards a more reciprocal, emergent, and contextualised approach is necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim is to develop citizenship education with students and staff in vocational education and training (VET), which increases student voice and fits the complex school system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We involved students and staff in citizenship education development and identified relevant factors that influenced this process. This participatory action research (PAR) study used a retrospective design assessing logbook entries, observations, interviews, and focus group discussions collected between September 2020 and September 2023 in four study programmes from one VET institution in the Netherlands. Thematic analysis was used to code the datasources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collaboration between students and staff flourished while using the curriculum negotiation tool. Relevant factors influencing the process were: alignment between project and participants' priorities and goals, receptivity to student and teacher voices, leadership engagement, and tensions and intentions about roles and responsibilities between participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasises the promise of involving students and staff in educational development. When teachers startedworking collaboratively with students, many of their initial doubts decreased, which led to renewed motivation for becoming student voice advocates. PAR has the potential of starkly disrupting the existing status quo and breaking through ingrained patterns within complex systems to ensure influence for students from all levels of education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Change\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"271-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09523-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09523-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管几十年来一直在努力改善学校,但保持学校的持久变化仍然是一项挑战。到目前为止,传统的干预措施在识别学校独特而复杂的环境方面一直不成功,这就是为什么有必要转向一种更加互惠、紧急和情境化的方法。目标:我们的目标是在职业教育和培训(VET)中发展学生和员工的公民教育,这增加了学生的声音,适合复杂的学校系统。方法:让学生和教职员参与到公民教育的发展过程中,并找出影响这一过程的相关因素。这项参与性行动研究(PAR)研究采用回顾性设计,评估了2020年9月至2023年9月期间在荷兰一所职业教育培训机构的四个研究项目中收集的日志记录、观察、访谈和焦点小组讨论。采用主题分析对数据源进行编码。结果:在使用课程协商工具的过程中,学生和教师之间的协作得到了极大的发展。影响过程的相关因素有:项目与参与者的优先级和目标之间的一致性,对学生和教师声音的接受程度,领导的参与程度,以及参与者之间关于角色和责任的紧张关系和意图。结论:这项研究强调了让学生和教职员参与教育发展的承诺。当教师开始与学生合作时,他们最初的许多疑虑减少了,这导致了成为学生声音倡导者的新动力。PAR有可能彻底打破现有的现状,突破复杂系统中根深蒂固的模式,以确保对各级教育的学生产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting student voice by involving vocational education students and staff in citizenship education development: a participatory action research study.

Introduction: Despite decades of school improvement efforts, maintaining lasting change in schools remains challenging. So far, traditional interventions have been unsuccessful in recognising schools' unique and complex contexts, which is why a shift towards a more reciprocal, emergent, and contextualised approach is necessary.

Objective: Our aim is to develop citizenship education with students and staff in vocational education and training (VET), which increases student voice and fits the complex school system.

Methods: We involved students and staff in citizenship education development and identified relevant factors that influenced this process. This participatory action research (PAR) study used a retrospective design assessing logbook entries, observations, interviews, and focus group discussions collected between September 2020 and September 2023 in four study programmes from one VET institution in the Netherlands. Thematic analysis was used to code the datasources.

Results: Collaboration between students and staff flourished while using the curriculum negotiation tool. Relevant factors influencing the process were: alignment between project and participants' priorities and goals, receptivity to student and teacher voices, leadership engagement, and tensions and intentions about roles and responsibilities between participants.

Conclusions: This study emphasises the promise of involving students and staff in educational development. When teachers startedworking collaboratively with students, many of their initial doubts decreased, which led to renewed motivation for becoming student voice advocates. PAR has the potential of starkly disrupting the existing status quo and breaking through ingrained patterns within complex systems to ensure influence for students from all levels of education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Change
Journal of Educational Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Change is an international, professionally refereed, state-of-the-art scholarly journal, reflecting the most important ideas and evidence of educational change. The journal brings together some of the most influential thinkers and writers as well as emerging scholars on educational change. It deals with issues like educational innovation, reform and restructuring, school improvement and effectiveness, culture-building, inspection, school-review, and change management. It examines why some people resist change and what their resistance means. It looks at how men and women, older teachers and younger teachers, students, parents and others experience change differently. It looks at the positive aspects of change but does not hesitate to raise uncomfortable questions about many aspects of educational change either. It looks critically and controversially at the social, economic, cultural and political forces that are driving educational change. The Journal of Educational Change welcomes and supports contributions from a range of disciplines, including history, psychology, political science, sociology, anthropology, philosophy and administrative and organizational theory, and from a broad spectrum of methodologies including quantitative and qualitative approaches, documentary study, action research and conceptual development. School leaders, system administrators, teacher leaders, consultants, facilitators, educational researchers, staff developers and change agents of all kinds will find this journal an indispensable resource for guiding them to both classic and cutting-edge understandings of educational change. No other journal provides such comprehensive coverage of the field of educational change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信