手术与非手术治疗血栓性外痔:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Marcelo Albuquerque Barbosa Martins, Luiz Felipe Costa de Almeida, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro, Luís Fernando Rosati Rocha, Rachid Eduardo Noleto da Nobrega Oliveira
{"title":"手术与非手术治疗血栓性外痔:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Marcelo Albuquerque Barbosa Martins, Luiz Felipe Costa de Almeida, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro, Luís Fernando Rosati Rocha, Rachid Eduardo Noleto da Nobrega Oliveira","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02302-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are a complication of hemorrhoids characterized by severe pain, swelling, and lump formation due to acute venous engorgement. Treatment options remain controversial, with limited evidence guiding the choice between surgical and conservative approaches. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 2024 to identify clinical trials comparing surgery with conservative treatment in thrombosed external hemorrhoids. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> test. We included six studies with a total of 851 patients, of whom 390 (45.8%) underwent surgical treatment. Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 54%). However, there were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding between the groups (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.27-3.44; P = 0.95; I<sup>2</sup> = 60%). Subgroup analyses of the excision surgery group revealed no differences between approaches. Our main findings indicated no significant difference in bleeding between surgery and conservative treatment groups. However, operative management is associated with significantly lower recurrences, which should be the preferred choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative versus nonoperative treatment of thrombosed external hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Albuquerque Barbosa Martins, Luiz Felipe Costa de Almeida, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro, Luís Fernando Rosati Rocha, Rachid Eduardo Noleto da Nobrega Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02302-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are a complication of hemorrhoids characterized by severe pain, swelling, and lump formation due to acute venous engorgement. Treatment options remain controversial, with limited evidence guiding the choice between surgical and conservative approaches. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 2024 to identify clinical trials comparing surgery with conservative treatment in thrombosed external hemorrhoids. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> test. We included six studies with a total of 851 patients, of whom 390 (45.8%) underwent surgical treatment. Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 54%). However, there were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding between the groups (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.27-3.44; P = 0.95; I<sup>2</sup> = 60%). Subgroup analyses of the excision surgery group revealed no differences between approaches. Our main findings indicated no significant difference in bleeding between surgery and conservative treatment groups. However, operative management is associated with significantly lower recurrences, which should be the preferred choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02302-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02302-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血栓性外痔是痔疮的一种并发症,其特征是剧烈疼痛、肿胀和因急性静脉充血而形成的肿块。治疗方案仍然存在争议,指导手术和保守方法选择的证据有限。检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,从成立到2024年12月,以确定比较手术与保守治疗血栓性外痔的临床试验。采用Review Manager 5.4.1随机效应模型进行统计分析。采用I2检验评估异质性。我们纳入了6项研究,共851例患者,其中390例(45.8%)接受了手术治疗。与保守治疗相比,手术治疗与较低的复发风险相关(RR 0.49;95% ci 0.26-0.91;p 2 = 54%)。然而,两组之间出血风险无显著差异(RR 0.96;95% ci 0.27-3.44;p = 0.95;i2 = 60%)。切除手术组的亚组分析显示两种入路之间没有差异。我们的主要发现表明手术组和保守治疗组之间出血无显著差异。然而,手术治疗与显著降低复发率相关,这应该是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of thrombosed external hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are a complication of hemorrhoids characterized by severe pain, swelling, and lump formation due to acute venous engorgement. Treatment options remain controversial, with limited evidence guiding the choice between surgical and conservative approaches. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 2024 to identify clinical trials comparing surgery with conservative treatment in thrombosed external hemorrhoids. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. We included six studies with a total of 851 patients, of whom 390 (45.8%) underwent surgical treatment. Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91; P < 0.05; I2 = 54%). However, there were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding between the groups (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.27-3.44; P = 0.95; I2 = 60%). Subgroup analyses of the excision surgery group revealed no differences between approaches. Our main findings indicated no significant difference in bleeding between surgery and conservative treatment groups. However, operative management is associated with significantly lower recurrences, which should be the preferred choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信