一线PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合或不联合抗血管生成治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项网络荟萃分析

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251348310
Linjing Zhou, Yuwei Li, Le Wang, Kaiyan Chen, Shichao Zhou, Yunfei Chen, Jing Sun, Yunfeng Tong, Yun Fan
{"title":"一线PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合或不联合抗血管生成治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项网络荟萃分析","authors":"Linjing Zhou, Yuwei Li, Le Wang, Kaiyan Chen, Shichao Zhou, Yunfei Chen, Jing Sun, Yunfeng Tong, Yun Fan","doi":"10.1177/17588359251348310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy, with or without angiogenesis inhibitors, have been investigated as the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, it remains unclear which treatment modalities are the most effective and safest, as comparative studies evaluating these treatment options are limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article aims to compare the relative efficacy and safety of ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis inhibitors versus ICIs + Chemo as the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A network meta-analysis was conducted to systematically compare the efficacy and safety data obtained from various clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Data source and methods: </strong>This study presents a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of data sourced from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences up to August 31, 2024. Furthermore, this study analyzed both published works and gray literature on randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 10 phase III RCTs comprising 2672 untreated ES-SCLC patients treated with two PD-L1 inhibitor combinations with angiogenesis inhibitors (ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis) and eight PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combinations (ICIs + Chemo). Patients treated with ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis inhibitors had higher progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.47-0.66) and overall response rate (ORR) (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.31) compare to those who were treated with ICIs + Chemo. However, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival (OS; HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19) and Grade ⩾ 3 adverse events (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.81-2.04) between these patients. The subgroup analyses revealed that the addition of angiogenesis inhibitors improved the OS in patients under 65 years. Moreover, PFS was improved in all subgroups except the central nervous system metastasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that first-line immunochemotherapy combined with angiogenesis inhibitors improves PFS and ORR in ES-SCLC patients; however, it did not affect OS. Therefore, it was inferred that patients under the age of 65 can gain survival benefits from the addition of anti-angiogenic therapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>INPLASY (INPLASY2023110061).</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251348310"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with or without anti-angiogenesis therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Linjing Zhou, Yuwei Li, Le Wang, Kaiyan Chen, Shichao Zhou, Yunfei Chen, Jing Sun, Yunfeng Tong, Yun Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359251348310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy, with or without angiogenesis inhibitors, have been investigated as the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, it remains unclear which treatment modalities are the most effective and safest, as comparative studies evaluating these treatment options are limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article aims to compare the relative efficacy and safety of ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis inhibitors versus ICIs + Chemo as the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A network meta-analysis was conducted to systematically compare the efficacy and safety data obtained from various clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Data source and methods: </strong>This study presents a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of data sourced from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences up to August 31, 2024. Furthermore, this study analyzed both published works and gray literature on randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 10 phase III RCTs comprising 2672 untreated ES-SCLC patients treated with two PD-L1 inhibitor combinations with angiogenesis inhibitors (ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis) and eight PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combinations (ICIs + Chemo). Patients treated with ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis inhibitors had higher progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.47-0.66) and overall response rate (ORR) (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.31) compare to those who were treated with ICIs + Chemo. However, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival (OS; HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19) and Grade ⩾ 3 adverse events (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.81-2.04) between these patients. The subgroup analyses revealed that the addition of angiogenesis inhibitors improved the OS in patients under 65 years. Moreover, PFS was improved in all subgroups except the central nervous system metastasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that first-line immunochemotherapy combined with angiogenesis inhibitors improves PFS and ORR in ES-SCLC patients; however, it did not affect OS. Therefore, it was inferred that patients under the age of 65 can gain survival benefits from the addition of anti-angiogenic therapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>INPLASY (INPLASY2023110061).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17588359251348310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198539/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251348310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251348310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合化疗(有或没有血管生成抑制剂)已被研究作为广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的一线治疗方法。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种治疗方式最有效和最安全,因为评估这些治疗方案的比较研究有限。目的:本文旨在比较ICIs + Chemo +血管生成抑制剂与ICIs + Chemo作为ES-SCLC一线治疗的相对疗效和安全性。设计:进行网络meta分析,系统比较从各种临床试验中获得的疗效和安全性数据。数据来源和方法:本研究对截至2024年8月31日的PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov和主要国际会议的数据进行了系统综述和贝叶斯网络元分析。此外,本研究还分析了随机临床试验(RCTs)的已发表文献和灰色文献。结果:对10项III期随机对照试验进行了全面分析,其中包括2672名未经治疗的ES-SCLC患者,接受两种PD-L1抑制剂联合血管生成抑制剂(ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis)和8种PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合(ICIs + Chemo)治疗。与接受ICIs + Chemo +血管生成抑制剂治疗的患者相比,接受ICIs + Chemo治疗的患者具有更高的无进展生存期(PFS)(风险比(HR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.47-0.66)和总缓解率(ORR) (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.31)。然而,总生存期(OS;这些患者之间的HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19)和等级大于或等于3的不良事件(OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.81-2.04)。亚组分析显示,添加血管生成抑制剂可改善65岁以下患者的OS。此外,除中枢神经系统转移外,所有亚组的PFS均有所改善。结论:本研究表明一线免疫化疗联合血管生成抑制剂可改善ES-SCLC患者的PFS和ORR;然而,它不影响操作系统。因此,我们推断65岁以下的患者可以从抗血管生成治疗的加入中获得生存获益。试验注册:INPLASY (INPLASY2023110061)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with or without anti-angiogenesis therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy, with or without angiogenesis inhibitors, have been investigated as the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, it remains unclear which treatment modalities are the most effective and safest, as comparative studies evaluating these treatment options are limited.

Objectives: This article aims to compare the relative efficacy and safety of ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis inhibitors versus ICIs + Chemo as the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC.

Design: A network meta-analysis was conducted to systematically compare the efficacy and safety data obtained from various clinical trials.

Data source and methods: This study presents a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of data sourced from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences up to August 31, 2024. Furthermore, this study analyzed both published works and gray literature on randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Results: A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 10 phase III RCTs comprising 2672 untreated ES-SCLC patients treated with two PD-L1 inhibitor combinations with angiogenesis inhibitors (ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis) and eight PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combinations (ICIs + Chemo). Patients treated with ICIs + Chemo + angiogenesis inhibitors had higher progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.47-0.66) and overall response rate (ORR) (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.31) compare to those who were treated with ICIs + Chemo. However, no significant difference was observed in the overall survival (OS; HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19) and Grade ⩾ 3 adverse events (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.81-2.04) between these patients. The subgroup analyses revealed that the addition of angiogenesis inhibitors improved the OS in patients under 65 years. Moreover, PFS was improved in all subgroups except the central nervous system metastasis.

Conclusion: This study revealed that first-line immunochemotherapy combined with angiogenesis inhibitors improves PFS and ORR in ES-SCLC patients; however, it did not affect OS. Therefore, it was inferred that patients under the age of 65 can gain survival benefits from the addition of anti-angiogenic therapy.

Trial registration: INPLASY (INPLASY2023110061).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信