骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折椎体成形术后残留背部疼痛的患病率和危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1111/os.70095
Wenlong Li, Bing Zhang, Chencheng Mei, Hui Li, Ruizheng Zhu, Hao Lin, Jianmin Wen, Yang Wu, Xianzhi Ma
{"title":"骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折椎体成形术后残留背部疼痛的患病率和危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenlong Li, Bing Zhang, Chencheng Mei, Hui Li, Ruizheng Zhu, Hao Lin, Jianmin Wen, Yang Wu, Xianzhi Ma","doi":"10.1111/os.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are prevalent among the elderly. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVA) is a commonly adopted minimally invasive treatment, yet many patients endure residual back pain (RBP) posttreatment, affecting their recovery and quality of life. Given the inconsistent prevalence of RBP across studies and the multitude of influencing factors, a systematic review and meta-analysis is necessary to determine its prevalence and identify risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>English (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid, Cochrane Library) and Chinese (CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM) literature databases were systematically searched until December 31, 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool prevalence rates from individual studies. The associations between the identified risk factors and RBP were also analyzed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyzes were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity and to compare the prevalence estimates across the groups. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBIs) quality assessment checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The I<sup>2</sup> tests were used to assess heterogeneity among the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5146 articles were collected. Finally, 26 articles involving 9703 participants were included. Among them, 1245 experienced RBP. The prevalence of RBP in individual studies ranged from 4.56% to 50.00%, with a median of 14.90%. The pooled prevalence was 16.3% (95% CI: 13.5%-19.1%). The prevalence was higher among females [16.1% (95% CI: 13.1%-19.1%)] than males [15.9% (95% CI: 12.5%-19.2%)]. Subgroup analysis based on evaluation time showed that the prevalence was higher at 3 months or more after surgery [total: 17.3% (95% CI: 13.2%-21.4%) vs. 15.7% (95% CI: 12.1%-19.2%), males: 16.5% (95% CI: 12.3%-20.6%) vs. 15.3% (95% CI: 11.0%-19.6%), females: 16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%-21.1%) vs. 15.5% (95% CI: 11.6%-19.5%)]. Regarding the risk factors, several factors demonstrated significant associations with RBP. Patients with low pre-bone mineral density were more likely to experience RBP compared to those with higher density. Moreover, thoracolumbar fascia injury, unsatisfactory cement distribution, multiple vertebral fractures, and postoperative vertebral body height recovery rate were also identified as risk factors increasing the likelihood of RBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBP is common after PVA, indicating the imperative of intervention strategies to alleviate the suffering and reduce negative ramifications. Moreover, various risk factors should be comprehensively considered to accurately assess patients' conditions and formulate targeted treatment and rehabilitation plans to alleviate patients' RBP symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2266-2280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Residual Back Pain After Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wenlong Li, Bing Zhang, Chencheng Mei, Hui Li, Ruizheng Zhu, Hao Lin, Jianmin Wen, Yang Wu, Xianzhi Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are prevalent among the elderly. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVA) is a commonly adopted minimally invasive treatment, yet many patients endure residual back pain (RBP) posttreatment, affecting their recovery and quality of life. Given the inconsistent prevalence of RBP across studies and the multitude of influencing factors, a systematic review and meta-analysis is necessary to determine its prevalence and identify risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>English (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid, Cochrane Library) and Chinese (CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM) literature databases were systematically searched until December 31, 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool prevalence rates from individual studies. The associations between the identified risk factors and RBP were also analyzed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyzes were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity and to compare the prevalence estimates across the groups. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBIs) quality assessment checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The I<sup>2</sup> tests were used to assess heterogeneity among the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5146 articles were collected. Finally, 26 articles involving 9703 participants were included. Among them, 1245 experienced RBP. The prevalence of RBP in individual studies ranged from 4.56% to 50.00%, with a median of 14.90%. The pooled prevalence was 16.3% (95% CI: 13.5%-19.1%). The prevalence was higher among females [16.1% (95% CI: 13.1%-19.1%)] than males [15.9% (95% CI: 12.5%-19.2%)]. Subgroup analysis based on evaluation time showed that the prevalence was higher at 3 months or more after surgery [total: 17.3% (95% CI: 13.2%-21.4%) vs. 15.7% (95% CI: 12.1%-19.2%), males: 16.5% (95% CI: 12.3%-20.6%) vs. 15.3% (95% CI: 11.0%-19.6%), females: 16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%-21.1%) vs. 15.5% (95% CI: 11.6%-19.5%)]. Regarding the risk factors, several factors demonstrated significant associations with RBP. Patients with low pre-bone mineral density were more likely to experience RBP compared to those with higher density. Moreover, thoracolumbar fascia injury, unsatisfactory cement distribution, multiple vertebral fractures, and postoperative vertebral body height recovery rate were also identified as risk factors increasing the likelihood of RBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBP is common after PVA, indicating the imperative of intervention strategies to alleviate the suffering and reduce negative ramifications. Moreover, various risk factors should be comprehensively considered to accurately assess patients' conditions and formulate targeted treatment and rehabilitation plans to alleviate patients' RBP symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2266-2280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70095\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)在老年人中很常见。经皮椎体成形术(Percutaneous vertebroplasty, PVA)是一种常用的微创治疗方法,但许多患者在治疗后会出现残余背痛(residual back pain, RBP),影响患者的康复和生活质量。鉴于各研究中RBP的患病率不一致,影响因素众多,有必要进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定其患病率和识别危险因素。方法:系统检索英文(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Ovid、Cochrane Library)和中文(CNKI、万方数据、VIP、CBM)文献数据库至2023年12月31日。随机效应荟萃分析用于汇总各个研究的患病率。还分析了确定的危险因素与RBP之间的关系。进行敏感性和亚组分析,以确定异质性的来源,并比较各组间的患病率估计。乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBIs)的质量评估清单用于评估纳入研究的质量。I2检验用于评估研究间的异质性。结果:共收集文献5146篇。最终纳入26篇文章,涉及9703名参与者。其中1245例经历RBP。个别研究中RBP的患病率从4.56%到50.00%不等,中位数为14.90%。合并患病率为16.3% (95% CI: 13.5%-19.1%)。女性的患病率[16.1% (95% CI: 13.1% ~ 19.1%)]高于男性[15.9% (95% CI: 12.5% ~ 19.2%)]。基于评估时间的亚组分析显示,术后3个月或更长时间患病率较高[总数:17.3% (95% CI: 13.2%-21.4%) vs 15.7% (95% CI: 12.1%-19.2%),男性:16.5% (95% CI: 12.3%-20.6%) vs 15.3% (95% CI: 11.0%-19.6%),女性:16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%-21.1%) vs 15.5% (95% CI: 11.6%-19.5%)]。关于危险因素,有几个因素与RBP有显著的关联。与骨前矿物质密度较高的患者相比,低骨密度的患者更容易发生RBP。此外,胸腰筋膜损伤、骨水泥分布不理想、多发椎体骨折、术后椎体高度恢复率也被认为是增加RBP发生可能性的危险因素。结论:RBP在PVA后很常见,表明干预策略的必要性,以减轻痛苦,减少负面影响。综合考虑各种危险因素,准确评估患者病情,制定有针对性的治疗和康复方案,缓解患者RBP症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Residual Back Pain After Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are prevalent among the elderly. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVA) is a commonly adopted minimally invasive treatment, yet many patients endure residual back pain (RBP) posttreatment, affecting their recovery and quality of life. Given the inconsistent prevalence of RBP across studies and the multitude of influencing factors, a systematic review and meta-analysis is necessary to determine its prevalence and identify risk factors.

Methods: English (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid, Cochrane Library) and Chinese (CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM) literature databases were systematically searched until December 31, 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool prevalence rates from individual studies. The associations between the identified risk factors and RBP were also analyzed. Sensitivity and subgroup analyzes were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity and to compare the prevalence estimates across the groups. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBIs) quality assessment checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity among the studies.

Results: A total of 5146 articles were collected. Finally, 26 articles involving 9703 participants were included. Among them, 1245 experienced RBP. The prevalence of RBP in individual studies ranged from 4.56% to 50.00%, with a median of 14.90%. The pooled prevalence was 16.3% (95% CI: 13.5%-19.1%). The prevalence was higher among females [16.1% (95% CI: 13.1%-19.1%)] than males [15.9% (95% CI: 12.5%-19.2%)]. Subgroup analysis based on evaluation time showed that the prevalence was higher at 3 months or more after surgery [total: 17.3% (95% CI: 13.2%-21.4%) vs. 15.7% (95% CI: 12.1%-19.2%), males: 16.5% (95% CI: 12.3%-20.6%) vs. 15.3% (95% CI: 11.0%-19.6%), females: 16.9% (95% CI: 12.6%-21.1%) vs. 15.5% (95% CI: 11.6%-19.5%)]. Regarding the risk factors, several factors demonstrated significant associations with RBP. Patients with low pre-bone mineral density were more likely to experience RBP compared to those with higher density. Moreover, thoracolumbar fascia injury, unsatisfactory cement distribution, multiple vertebral fractures, and postoperative vertebral body height recovery rate were also identified as risk factors increasing the likelihood of RBP.

Conclusion: RBP is common after PVA, indicating the imperative of intervention strategies to alleviate the suffering and reduce negative ramifications. Moreover, various risk factors should be comprehensively considered to accurately assess patients' conditions and formulate targeted treatment and rehabilitation plans to alleviate patients' RBP symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信