Kavita Shah Arora, Suzanna Larkin, Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, Quiara Shade, Susie Williamson, Susan Dorr Goold
{"title":"关于联邦强制医疗补助绝育政策的社区成员的目标和优先事项。","authors":"Kavita Shah Arora, Suzanna Larkin, Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, Quiara Shade, Susie Williamson, Susan Dorr Goold","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Kavita Shah Arora, Suzanna Larkin, Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, Quiara Shade, Susie Williamson, Susan Dorr Goold\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy.
Objective: To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.
Methods: This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.
Results: Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.
Conclusion: Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.