关于联邦强制医疗补助绝育政策的社区成员的目标和优先事项。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kavita Shah Arora, Suzanna Larkin, Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, Quiara Shade, Susie Williamson, Susan Dorr Goold
{"title":"关于联邦强制医疗补助绝育政策的社区成员的目标和优先事项。","authors":"Kavita Shah Arora, Suzanna Larkin, Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, Quiara Shade, Susie Williamson, Susan Dorr Goold","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Kavita Shah Arora, Suzanna Larkin, Jessie Milne, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, Quiara Shade, Susie Williamson, Susan Dorr Goold\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述可能符合医疗补助保险条件的社区成员对30天绝育等待期的意见。方法:这项混合方法研究包括在2024年4月至6月期间对85名低收入(21-51岁)的密歇根州居民进行10次知情审议,以探讨和描述他们对等待期的想法并建议修改政策。审议环节包括政策教育、专家问答、主持人主持的讨论以及对潜在政策方案的小组讨论。参与者完成了有关避孕和医疗补助绝育政策的知识和意见的调查和事后调查,并验证了有关避孕自主权、卫生保健经验和歧视的量表。结果:审议者倾向于用一项修订后的政策取代目前的政策,该政策包括减少或取消适用于所有个人的等待期,而不仅仅是那些拥有医疗补助保险的人。他们还建议修订知情同意程序,以实现清晰、可及性、讨论的开放性和及时性。结论:参与知情审议的低收入群体建议更换现行政策,表明该政策不符合受影响最严重的社区的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Goals and Priorities of Community Members Regarding the Federally Mandated Medicaid Sterilization Policy.

Objective: To describe the opinions of community members who are potentially eligible for Medicaid insurance regarding the 30-day sterilization waiting period.

Methods: This mixed-methods study consisted of 10 informed deliberation sessions with 85 Michigan residents with low income (aged 21-51 years) between April and June 2024 to explore and describe their thoughts about the waiting period and suggested revisions to the policy. The deliberation sessions included policy education, expert questions and answers, facilitator-led discussion, and a small-group exercise on potential policy options. Participants completed presurveys and postsurveys measuring knowledge and opinions about contraception and the Medicaid sterilization policy and validated scales regarding contraceptive autonomy, health care experience, and discrimination.

Results: Deliberators favored replacing the current policy with a revised policy that includes a reduced or eliminated waiting period that applies to all individuals, not solely to those with Medicaid insurance. They also recommended revising the informed consent process for clarity, accessibility, openness to discussion, and timeliness.

Conclusion: Groups with low income who engaged in informed deliberations recommended replacing the current policy, indicating that the policy does not serve the goals of the communities most affected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信