真菌病快速鉴定板的评价。

IF 3.3 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf110
Emily A Siegrist, Bryan P White, Denise Robison, Cindy McCloskey, Maria Alkozah, Nelson Agudelo Higuita, Rita Wilson Dib, Joseph Sassine
{"title":"真菌病快速鉴定板的评价。","authors":"Emily A Siegrist, Bryan P White, Denise Robison, Cindy McCloskey, Maria Alkozah, Nelson Agudelo Higuita, Rita Wilson Dib, Joseph Sassine","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bloodstream infections due to yeast are associated with a high mortality rate. There is a lack of data that evaluate the real-world sensitivity of a rapid detection system for bloodstream infections due to yeast or the impact of these results on antimicrobial stewardship. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of an ePlex panel (BCID-FP) for rapid detection of yeast from a positive blood culture bottle and to evaluate the impact of these rapid results on antifungal escalation or de-escalation. We evaluated 63 episodes of fungemia and found a sensitivity of 94%, lower than the 99%-100% stated in the package insert. Most common pathogens were <i>Candida glabrata</i> (36%), <i>Candida albicans</i> (24%), <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> (10%) and <i>Candida krusei</i> (10%). Only 57.1% of BCID-FP results lead to a change in antifungal therapy, most of which was initiation of an echinocandin. The real-world sensitivity of the BCID-FP panel was lower than anticipated and rarely led to de-escalation of antifungal therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 3","pages":"dlaf110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a rapid identification panel for fungemia.\",\"authors\":\"Emily A Siegrist, Bryan P White, Denise Robison, Cindy McCloskey, Maria Alkozah, Nelson Agudelo Higuita, Rita Wilson Dib, Joseph Sassine\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bloodstream infections due to yeast are associated with a high mortality rate. There is a lack of data that evaluate the real-world sensitivity of a rapid detection system for bloodstream infections due to yeast or the impact of these results on antimicrobial stewardship. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of an ePlex panel (BCID-FP) for rapid detection of yeast from a positive blood culture bottle and to evaluate the impact of these rapid results on antifungal escalation or de-escalation. We evaluated 63 episodes of fungemia and found a sensitivity of 94%, lower than the 99%-100% stated in the package insert. Most common pathogens were <i>Candida glabrata</i> (36%), <i>Candida albicans</i> (24%), <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> (10%) and <i>Candida krusei</i> (10%). Only 57.1% of BCID-FP results lead to a change in antifungal therapy, most of which was initiation of an echinocandin. The real-world sensitivity of the BCID-FP panel was lower than anticipated and rarely led to de-escalation of antifungal therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"dlaf110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由酵母菌引起的血液感染与高死亡率有关。缺乏评估酵母引起的血液感染的快速检测系统的实际敏感性或这些结果对抗菌药物管理的影响的数据。本研究的目的是评估ePlex面板(BCID-FP)快速检测阳性血培养瓶中酵母菌的敏感性,并评估这些快速结果对抗真菌升级或降级的影响。我们评估了63例真菌病,发现敏感性为94%,低于包装说明书中所述的99%-100%。最常见的病原菌为光秃念珠菌(36%)、白色念珠菌(24%)、假丝酵母菌(10%)和克鲁氏念珠菌(10%)。只有57.1%的BCID-FP结果导致抗真菌治疗的改变,其中大多数是开始使用棘白菌素。BCID-FP组的真实敏感性低于预期,很少导致抗真菌治疗的降级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a rapid identification panel for fungemia.

Bloodstream infections due to yeast are associated with a high mortality rate. There is a lack of data that evaluate the real-world sensitivity of a rapid detection system for bloodstream infections due to yeast or the impact of these results on antimicrobial stewardship. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of an ePlex panel (BCID-FP) for rapid detection of yeast from a positive blood culture bottle and to evaluate the impact of these rapid results on antifungal escalation or de-escalation. We evaluated 63 episodes of fungemia and found a sensitivity of 94%, lower than the 99%-100% stated in the package insert. Most common pathogens were Candida glabrata (36%), Candida albicans (24%), Candida parapsilosis (10%) and Candida krusei (10%). Only 57.1% of BCID-FP results lead to a change in antifungal therapy, most of which was initiation of an echinocandin. The real-world sensitivity of the BCID-FP panel was lower than anticipated and rarely led to de-escalation of antifungal therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信