联合磷霉素治疗金黄色葡萄球菌血症或心内膜炎:随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101
Ahmad Mourad, Joshua B Parsons, Lesley A Skalla, Thomas L Holland, Timothy C Jenkins
{"title":"联合磷霉素治疗金黄色葡萄球菌血症或心内膜炎:随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ahmad Mourad, Joshua B Parsons, Lesley A Skalla, Thomas L Holland, Timothy C Jenkins","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Fosfomycin combination therapy for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis has been evaluated, but studies were limited by small sample sizes. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish robust efficacy and safety estimates of fosfomycin combination therapy in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through September 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42024583822).</p><p><strong>Study eligibility: </strong>RCTs comparing fosfomycin combination with standard-of-care antibiotics in patients with <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis and analysis: </strong>Treatment effects were estimated with pooled risk ratios (RRs) using random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with Cochran's Q-statistic and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 437 articles identified, three RCTs met inclusion criteria. Primary outcome of treatment success or cure was not meta-analysed due to clinical heterogeneity. Combination therapy did not significantly improve mortality (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.28-2.52; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>  = 27.8%) or persistent bacteraemia (RR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.04-2.59; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>  = 0%). Participants receiving combination therapy had more adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, but this was not statistically significant (RR 1.84; 95% CI, 0.36-9.36; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>  = 18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, fosfomycin combination therapy for <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis did not significantly improve patient outcomes and may be associated with higher rates of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 3","pages":"dlaf101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination therapy with fosfomycin for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Mourad, Joshua B Parsons, Lesley A Skalla, Thomas L Holland, Timothy C Jenkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Fosfomycin combination therapy for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis has been evaluated, but studies were limited by small sample sizes. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish robust efficacy and safety estimates of fosfomycin combination therapy in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through September 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42024583822).</p><p><strong>Study eligibility: </strong>RCTs comparing fosfomycin combination with standard-of-care antibiotics in patients with <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis and analysis: </strong>Treatment effects were estimated with pooled risk ratios (RRs) using random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with Cochran's Q-statistic and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 437 articles identified, three RCTs met inclusion criteria. Primary outcome of treatment success or cure was not meta-analysed due to clinical heterogeneity. Combination therapy did not significantly improve mortality (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.28-2.52; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>  = 27.8%) or persistent bacteraemia (RR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.04-2.59; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>  = 0%). Participants receiving combination therapy had more adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, but this was not statistically significant (RR 1.84; 95% CI, 0.36-9.36; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>  = 18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, fosfomycin combination therapy for <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia or endocarditis did not significantly improve patient outcomes and may be associated with higher rates of adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"dlaf101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199917/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:已经对磷霉素联合治疗金黄色葡萄球菌血症或心内膜炎进行了评估,但研究受到样本量小的限制。我们试图对随机对照试验(rct)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以建立磷霉素联合治疗在该患者群体中的有效性和安全性评估。数据来源:MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库从成立到2024年9月(PROSPERO CRD42024583822)。研究资格:纳入比较磷霉素联合标准治疗抗生素治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症或心内膜炎患者的随机对照试验。两名独立审稿人筛选了纳入的研究。偏倚风险评估:使用修订后的Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。数据综合与分析:采用随机效应荟萃分析,用合并风险比(rr)估计治疗效果。采用Cochran’s q -统计量和i2检验评估研究间的异质性。结果:在纳入的437篇文章中,有3篇rct符合纳入标准。由于临床异质性,未对治疗成功或治愈的主要结局进行meta分析。联合治疗未显著改善死亡率(RR 0.85;95% ci, 0.28-2.52;I2 = 27.8%)或持续性菌血症(RR 0.34;95% ci, 0.04-2.59;I2 = 0%)。接受联合治疗的参与者有更多的不良事件导致停药,但这没有统计学意义(RR 1.84;95% ci, 0.36-9.36;I2 = 18%)。结论:在三项随机对照试验的荟萃分析中,磷霉素联合治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症或心内膜炎并没有显著改善患者的预后,而且可能与较高的不良事件发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination therapy with fosfomycin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia or endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Background and objectives: Fosfomycin combination therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia or endocarditis has been evaluated, but studies were limited by small sample sizes. We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish robust efficacy and safety estimates of fosfomycin combination therapy in this patient population.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through September 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42024583822).

Study eligibility: RCTs comparing fosfomycin combination with standard-of-care antibiotics in patients with S. aureus bacteraemia or endocarditis were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion.

Assessment of risk of bias: Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool.

Data synthesis and analysis: Treatment effects were estimated with pooled risk ratios (RRs) using random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with Cochran's Q-statistic and I 2 test.

Results: Of 437 articles identified, three RCTs met inclusion criteria. Primary outcome of treatment success or cure was not meta-analysed due to clinical heterogeneity. Combination therapy did not significantly improve mortality (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.28-2.52; I2  = 27.8%) or persistent bacteraemia (RR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.04-2.59; I2  = 0%). Participants receiving combination therapy had more adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, but this was not statistically significant (RR 1.84; 95% CI, 0.36-9.36; I2  = 18%).

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, fosfomycin combination therapy for S. aureus bacteraemia or endocarditis did not significantly improve patient outcomes and may be associated with higher rates of adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信