加热烟草制品专卖店顾客的加热烟草制品使用模式和经生化验证的吸烟状况

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Konstantinos Farsalinos, Eleni Diamantopoulou, Theoni Agapitou, Giannis Trikilis, Anastasia Barbouni
{"title":"加热烟草制品专卖店顾客的加热烟草制品使用模式和经生化验证的吸烟状况","authors":"Konstantinos Farsalinos, Eleni Diamantopoulou, Theoni Agapitou, Giannis Trikilis, Anastasia Barbouni","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04029-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To understand the population impact of heated tobacco products (HTPs), examining the profile of their users is crucial. This study aimed to assess characteristics, patterns of HTP use, and biochemically verified smoking status of customers visiting specialized HTP stores in Greece. Two specialized stores selling IQOS HTPs were randomly selected in Athens. Researchers recruited consecutive adult customers purchasing products for personal use during store visits. Current smoking status was determined by measuring exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO), with ≥ 7 ppm classifying participants as current smokers. A questionnaire explored demographics, past and current smoking history, HTP use patterns, and dependence indicators. A total of 373 HTP users participated. The vast majority (98.1%) had a smoking history prior to HTP initiation. Former smokers represented 67.8% of the study sample, defined based on self-report and having eCO < 7 ppm, with 90.1% of them reporting they had quit with the use of HTPs. Current smokers represented 30.3% of the sample and reported a 50% median reduction in daily cigarette consumption post-HTP use initiation. Never-smokers represented 1.9% of the sample, all of whom had eCO ≤ 3 ppm. Daily HTP use was the predominant pattern of use in both groups, but was more prevalent among former smokers. Most participants perceived HTPs as less harmful than cigarettes. From logistic regression analysis, factors associated with being a former smoker were HTP use duration (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and daily HTP use (OR: 6.93, 95% CI 1.93-24.92). Customers of specialized HTP stores in Greece were predominantly individuals with a history of smoking. A substantial proportion was biochemically verified former smokers and reported they had quit with the help of HTPs. Use by never-smokers was rare in this retail setting, and did not lead to subsequent smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of heated tobacco product use and biochemically verified smoking status among customers of dedicated heated tobacco product stores.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Farsalinos, Eleni Diamantopoulou, Theoni Agapitou, Giannis Trikilis, Anastasia Barbouni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04029-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To understand the population impact of heated tobacco products (HTPs), examining the profile of their users is crucial. This study aimed to assess characteristics, patterns of HTP use, and biochemically verified smoking status of customers visiting specialized HTP stores in Greece. Two specialized stores selling IQOS HTPs were randomly selected in Athens. Researchers recruited consecutive adult customers purchasing products for personal use during store visits. Current smoking status was determined by measuring exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO), with ≥ 7 ppm classifying participants as current smokers. A questionnaire explored demographics, past and current smoking history, HTP use patterns, and dependence indicators. A total of 373 HTP users participated. The vast majority (98.1%) had a smoking history prior to HTP initiation. Former smokers represented 67.8% of the study sample, defined based on self-report and having eCO < 7 ppm, with 90.1% of them reporting they had quit with the use of HTPs. Current smokers represented 30.3% of the sample and reported a 50% median reduction in daily cigarette consumption post-HTP use initiation. Never-smokers represented 1.9% of the sample, all of whom had eCO ≤ 3 ppm. Daily HTP use was the predominant pattern of use in both groups, but was more prevalent among former smokers. Most participants perceived HTPs as less harmful than cigarettes. From logistic regression analysis, factors associated with being a former smoker were HTP use duration (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and daily HTP use (OR: 6.93, 95% CI 1.93-24.92). Customers of specialized HTP stores in Greece were predominantly individuals with a history of smoking. A substantial proportion was biochemically verified former smokers and reported they had quit with the help of HTPs. Use by never-smokers was rare in this retail setting, and did not lead to subsequent smoking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04029-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04029-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解加热烟草制品对人口的影响,检查其使用者的概况至关重要。本研究旨在评估希腊HTP专业商店顾客的特征、HTP使用模式和生化验证吸烟状况。在雅典随机选择了两家销售IQOS htp的专业商店。研究人员招募了在商店访问期间连续购买个人使用产品的成年顾客。通过测量呼出的一氧化碳(eCO)来确定当前吸烟状况,≥7 ppm将参与者归类为当前吸烟者。问卷调查了人口统计、过去和现在的吸烟史、HTP使用模式和依赖性指标。共有373名http用户参与了调查。绝大多数(98.1%)在HTP开始前有吸烟史。前吸烟者占研究样本的67.8%,根据自我报告和患有eCO来定义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of heated tobacco product use and biochemically verified smoking status among customers of dedicated heated tobacco product stores.

To understand the population impact of heated tobacco products (HTPs), examining the profile of their users is crucial. This study aimed to assess characteristics, patterns of HTP use, and biochemically verified smoking status of customers visiting specialized HTP stores in Greece. Two specialized stores selling IQOS HTPs were randomly selected in Athens. Researchers recruited consecutive adult customers purchasing products for personal use during store visits. Current smoking status was determined by measuring exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO), with ≥ 7 ppm classifying participants as current smokers. A questionnaire explored demographics, past and current smoking history, HTP use patterns, and dependence indicators. A total of 373 HTP users participated. The vast majority (98.1%) had a smoking history prior to HTP initiation. Former smokers represented 67.8% of the study sample, defined based on self-report and having eCO < 7 ppm, with 90.1% of them reporting they had quit with the use of HTPs. Current smokers represented 30.3% of the sample and reported a 50% median reduction in daily cigarette consumption post-HTP use initiation. Never-smokers represented 1.9% of the sample, all of whom had eCO ≤ 3 ppm. Daily HTP use was the predominant pattern of use in both groups, but was more prevalent among former smokers. Most participants perceived HTPs as less harmful than cigarettes. From logistic regression analysis, factors associated with being a former smoker were HTP use duration (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and daily HTP use (OR: 6.93, 95% CI 1.93-24.92). Customers of specialized HTP stores in Greece were predominantly individuals with a history of smoking. A substantial proportion was biochemically verified former smokers and reported they had quit with the help of HTPs. Use by never-smokers was rare in this retail setting, and did not lead to subsequent smoking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信