慢性肝病患者健康筛查的可行和可接受的社会驱动因素。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Communications Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000758
Rebecca G Kim, April Ballantyne, Rachel R Codden, Morgan M Millar, Andrea Wallace, John M Inadomi, Molly B Conroy, Jennifer C Price
{"title":"慢性肝病患者健康筛查的可行和可接受的社会驱动因素。","authors":"Rebecca G Kim, April Ballantyne, Rachel R Codden, Morgan M Millar, Andrea Wallace, John M Inadomi, Molly B Conroy, Jennifer C Price","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social drivers of health (SDoH) contribute to health disparities among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of SDoH screening in hepatology clinics. This study aimed to define SDoH prevalence among CLD patients, identify a feasible and acceptable screening approach, and assess the convergent validity of a locally developed screener.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among adult patients with CLD receiving care in hepatology clinics, 2 SDoH screeners were administered to eligible participants: (1) default electronic medical record (EMR) questions and (2) Screener for Intensifying Community Referrals for Health (SINCERE). The primary outcomes were (1) prevalence of SDoH, (2) SDoH screening feasibility and acceptability, and (3) factors associated with screening acceptability. As a secondary outcome, the convergent validity of SINCERE to EMR was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 250 participants, the mean age was 56 years, 56% were women, 22% were Hispanic, 7% were American Indian/Alaska Native, 58% had cirrhosis, 29% completed high school or less, 22% were unemployed/disabled, and 29% had an annual income <$35,000. Based on SINCERE, 26% had food insecurity, 8% transportation needs, 43% financial strain, 5% lack of social support, and 24% housing instability. Most respondents (69%) were comfortable or very comfortable completing SDoH screening. Using the McNemar test, there were statistically significant differences between screeners for financial strain and housing instability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among CLD patients at our center, SDoH were prevalent, and screening within the hepatology clinic was feasible and acceptable. To detect social needs, SINCERE, a locally developed screener, had overall acceptable convergent validity. These data support SDoH screening in hepatology clinics. Future multicenter studies evaluating the effective implementation of SDoH screening for CLD patients, including contextualized care plans and connection to available resources, should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12978,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Communications","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasible and acceptable social drivers of health screening among patients with chronic liver disease.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca G Kim, April Ballantyne, Rachel R Codden, Morgan M Millar, Andrea Wallace, John M Inadomi, Molly B Conroy, Jennifer C Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social drivers of health (SDoH) contribute to health disparities among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of SDoH screening in hepatology clinics. This study aimed to define SDoH prevalence among CLD patients, identify a feasible and acceptable screening approach, and assess the convergent validity of a locally developed screener.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among adult patients with CLD receiving care in hepatology clinics, 2 SDoH screeners were administered to eligible participants: (1) default electronic medical record (EMR) questions and (2) Screener for Intensifying Community Referrals for Health (SINCERE). The primary outcomes were (1) prevalence of SDoH, (2) SDoH screening feasibility and acceptability, and (3) factors associated with screening acceptability. As a secondary outcome, the convergent validity of SINCERE to EMR was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 250 participants, the mean age was 56 years, 56% were women, 22% were Hispanic, 7% were American Indian/Alaska Native, 58% had cirrhosis, 29% completed high school or less, 22% were unemployed/disabled, and 29% had an annual income <$35,000. Based on SINCERE, 26% had food insecurity, 8% transportation needs, 43% financial strain, 5% lack of social support, and 24% housing instability. Most respondents (69%) were comfortable or very comfortable completing SDoH screening. Using the McNemar test, there were statistically significant differences between screeners for financial strain and housing instability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among CLD patients at our center, SDoH were prevalent, and screening within the hepatology clinic was feasible and acceptable. To detect social needs, SINCERE, a locally developed screener, had overall acceptable convergent validity. These data support SDoH screening in hepatology clinics. Future multicenter studies evaluating the effective implementation of SDoH screening for CLD patients, including contextualized care plans and connection to available resources, should be conducted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"volume\":\"9 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000758\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社会健康驱动因素(SDoH)导致慢性肝病(CLD)患者的健康差异。肝内科临床对SDoH筛查的可行性和可接受性知之甚少。本研究旨在确定慢性肝病患者中SDoH的患病率,确定一种可行和可接受的筛查方法,并评估当地开发的筛查方法的收敛效度。方法:在肝病诊所接受治疗的成年CLD患者中,对符合条件的参与者进行2种SDoH筛查:(1)默认电子病历(EMR)问题和(2)加强社区健康转诊筛查(诚恳)。主要结局为(1)SDoH的患病率,(2)SDoH筛查的可行性和可接受性,以及(3)与筛查可接受性相关的因素。作为次要结果,评估了诚恳对EMR的收敛效度。结果:在250名参与者中,平均年龄为56岁,56%为女性,22%为西班牙裔,7%为美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民,58%为肝硬化,29%为高中以下学历,22%为失业/残疾,29%为年收入。结论:在我们中心的CLD患者中,SDoH很普遍,在肝病诊所进行筛查是可行和可接受的。在检测社会需求方面,本地开发的“真诚”量表具有总体可接受的收敛效度。这些数据支持肝脏病学诊所进行SDoH筛查。未来的多中心研究应评估CLD患者SDoH筛查的有效实施,包括情境化护理计划和与可用资源的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasible and acceptable social drivers of health screening among patients with chronic liver disease.

Background: Social drivers of health (SDoH) contribute to health disparities among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of SDoH screening in hepatology clinics. This study aimed to define SDoH prevalence among CLD patients, identify a feasible and acceptable screening approach, and assess the convergent validity of a locally developed screener.

Methods: Among adult patients with CLD receiving care in hepatology clinics, 2 SDoH screeners were administered to eligible participants: (1) default electronic medical record (EMR) questions and (2) Screener for Intensifying Community Referrals for Health (SINCERE). The primary outcomes were (1) prevalence of SDoH, (2) SDoH screening feasibility and acceptability, and (3) factors associated with screening acceptability. As a secondary outcome, the convergent validity of SINCERE to EMR was assessed.

Results: Among 250 participants, the mean age was 56 years, 56% were women, 22% were Hispanic, 7% were American Indian/Alaska Native, 58% had cirrhosis, 29% completed high school or less, 22% were unemployed/disabled, and 29% had an annual income <$35,000. Based on SINCERE, 26% had food insecurity, 8% transportation needs, 43% financial strain, 5% lack of social support, and 24% housing instability. Most respondents (69%) were comfortable or very comfortable completing SDoH screening. Using the McNemar test, there were statistically significant differences between screeners for financial strain and housing instability.

Conclusions: Among CLD patients at our center, SDoH were prevalent, and screening within the hepatology clinic was feasible and acceptable. To detect social needs, SINCERE, a locally developed screener, had overall acceptable convergent validity. These data support SDoH screening in hepatology clinics. Future multicenter studies evaluating the effective implementation of SDoH screening for CLD patients, including contextualized care plans and connection to available resources, should be conducted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Communications
Hepatology Communications GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology Communications is a peer-reviewed, online-only, open access journal for fast dissemination of high quality basic, translational, and clinical research in hepatology. Hepatology Communications maintains high standard and rigorous peer review. Because of its open access nature, authors retain the copyright to their works, all articles are immediately available and free to read and share, and it is fully compliant with funder and institutional mandates. The journal is committed to fast publication and author satisfaction. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信