四种单甲基auristatin e偶联抗体药物偶联物的不良事件概况:基于美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的歧化分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yohei Doi, Ichiro Ieiri, Mayako Uchida, Takeshi Hirota
{"title":"四种单甲基auristatin e偶联抗体药物偶联物的不良事件概况:基于美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的歧化分析。","authors":"Yohei Doi, Ichiro Ieiri, Mayako Uchida, Takeshi Hirota","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2526790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) have recently become prevalent in cancer treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the adverse events (AEs) associated with regulatory-approved MMAE-conjugated ADCs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A disproportionality analysis of reports from July 2011 to September 2024 was conducted to detect AE signals in adult patients with cancer receiving any of the four MMAE-conjugated ADCs (brentuximab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin, polatuzumab vedotin, and tisotumab vedotin) using reporting odds ratio and information component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FAERS yielded 12,655 reported cases with 4,958 drug-AE pairs. Positive signals observed across the four MMAE-ADCs included 'blood and lymphatic system disorders' and 'metabolism and nutrition disorders' at the system organ class, and anemia, febrile neutropenia, hypokalemia, peripheral neuropathy, and pneumonitis for individual AEs, with 54 other overlapping AEs shared by at least three of the ADCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FAERS analysis revealed overlapping safety signals in MMAE-conjugated ADCs. Although further research is necessary to clarify the causal relationships, our findings provide a basis for understanding the characteristics of possible AEs in MMAE-ADCs, aiding clinical decision-making for patient safety management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse event profiles of four monomethyl auristatin E-conjugated antibody drug conjugates: a disproportionality analysis based on the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.\",\"authors\":\"Yohei Doi, Ichiro Ieiri, Mayako Uchida, Takeshi Hirota\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2025.2526790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) have recently become prevalent in cancer treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the adverse events (AEs) associated with regulatory-approved MMAE-conjugated ADCs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A disproportionality analysis of reports from July 2011 to September 2024 was conducted to detect AE signals in adult patients with cancer receiving any of the four MMAE-conjugated ADCs (brentuximab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin, polatuzumab vedotin, and tisotumab vedotin) using reporting odds ratio and information component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FAERS yielded 12,655 reported cases with 4,958 drug-AE pairs. Positive signals observed across the four MMAE-ADCs included 'blood and lymphatic system disorders' and 'metabolism and nutrition disorders' at the system organ class, and anemia, febrile neutropenia, hypokalemia, peripheral neuropathy, and pneumonitis for individual AEs, with 54 other overlapping AEs shared by at least three of the ADCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FAERS analysis revealed overlapping safety signals in MMAE-conjugated ADCs. Although further research is necessary to clarify the causal relationships, our findings provide a basis for understanding the characteristics of possible AEs in MMAE-ADCs, aiding clinical decision-making for patient safety management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2526790\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2526790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗体-药物偶联物(adc)与单甲基auristatin E (MMAE)最近在癌症治疗中变得普遍。本研究旨在使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)全面检查与监管部门批准的mmae偶联adc相关的不良事件(ae)。研究设计和方法:对2011年7月至2024年9月接受四种mmae偶联adc (brentuximab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin, polatuzumab vedotin和tisotumab vedotin)的成年癌症患者的AE信号进行了比例分析,采用报告优势比和信息成分检测AE信号。结果:FAERS共报告12655例,药物ae对4958对。在4个mmae - adc中观察到的阳性信号包括系统器官类别的“血液和淋巴系统紊乱”和“代谢和营养紊乱”,以及单个ae的贫血、发热性中性粒细胞减少症、低血盐血症、周围神经病变和肺炎,至少3个adc共有54个其他重叠ae。结论:FAERS分析显示mmae偶联adc的安全信号重叠。虽然需要进一步的研究来澄清因果关系,但我们的研究结果为了解mmae - adc中可能的ae的特征提供了基础,有助于临床决策患者安全管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse event profiles of four monomethyl auristatin E-conjugated antibody drug conjugates: a disproportionality analysis based on the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) have recently become prevalent in cancer treatment. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the adverse events (AEs) associated with regulatory-approved MMAE-conjugated ADCs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Research design and methods: A disproportionality analysis of reports from July 2011 to September 2024 was conducted to detect AE signals in adult patients with cancer receiving any of the four MMAE-conjugated ADCs (brentuximab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin, polatuzumab vedotin, and tisotumab vedotin) using reporting odds ratio and information component.

Results: FAERS yielded 12,655 reported cases with 4,958 drug-AE pairs. Positive signals observed across the four MMAE-ADCs included 'blood and lymphatic system disorders' and 'metabolism and nutrition disorders' at the system organ class, and anemia, febrile neutropenia, hypokalemia, peripheral neuropathy, and pneumonitis for individual AEs, with 54 other overlapping AEs shared by at least three of the ADCs.

Conclusions: FAERS analysis revealed overlapping safety signals in MMAE-conjugated ADCs. Although further research is necessary to clarify the causal relationships, our findings provide a basis for understanding the characteristics of possible AEs in MMAE-ADCs, aiding clinical decision-making for patient safety management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信