下午讨论:剂量发现临床试验会议中的统计问题。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Anna Heath, Kelley M Kidwell
{"title":"下午讨论:剂量发现临床试验会议中的统计问题。","authors":"Anna Heath, Kelley M Kidwell","doi":"10.1177/17407745251350598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The adoption of innovative, model-based, and computationally intensive clinical trial designs is challenged by barriers including clinician engagement, regulatory acceptance, dissemination beyond major research institutions, and patient accrual. This session explored strategies to overcome these barriers. Key approaches discussed included the development of user-friendly software and interactive platforms to enhance transparency, open sharing of algorithms, and recognition of software contributions in academic publishing. Building collaborations with stakeholders predisposed to innovation, fostering interdisciplinary communication, and producing complementary methodological and clinical publications were emphasized as essential steps. Practical considerations for trials with small sample sizes included the use of adaptive designs, individualized trials, and alternative optimization strategies when traditional theoretical assumptions are infeasible. A major theme of the discussion was the importance of model assumptions in innovative designs. Questions were raised about the sensitivity of results to these assumptions and the robustness of methods, particularly under limited sample sizes. Addressing this requires extensive simulation studies across varied scenarios to assess operating characteristics. The focus should be on achieving clinically meaningful goals-such as identifying effective dose regions-rather than perfect model specification. Speakers emphasized the need to acknowledge and, when feasible, test assumptions post hoc, integrating such verification as secondary objectives in trial design. An iterative scientific process was encouraged, recognizing that trials not only serve immediate clinical goals but also advance broader scientific understanding. Assumptions provide a principled foundation for methodology, but thoughtful scrutiny of their realism was urged, given the risk of relying on overly strong or untestable premises. The potential of metaheuristic algorithms was highlighted for efficiently identifying optimal designs across different model assumptions, supporting robustness evaluations. Practical implementation should adapt optimal designs to stakeholder needs while preserving acceptable statistical efficiency. In sum, advancing the adoption of innovative designs requires improved communication, infrastructure, and methodological transparency, alongside careful evaluation of model assumptions and robustness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"17407745251350598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Afternoon discussion: Statistical issues in clinical trials conference on dose finding.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Heath, Kelley M Kidwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17407745251350598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The adoption of innovative, model-based, and computationally intensive clinical trial designs is challenged by barriers including clinician engagement, regulatory acceptance, dissemination beyond major research institutions, and patient accrual. This session explored strategies to overcome these barriers. Key approaches discussed included the development of user-friendly software and interactive platforms to enhance transparency, open sharing of algorithms, and recognition of software contributions in academic publishing. Building collaborations with stakeholders predisposed to innovation, fostering interdisciplinary communication, and producing complementary methodological and clinical publications were emphasized as essential steps. Practical considerations for trials with small sample sizes included the use of adaptive designs, individualized trials, and alternative optimization strategies when traditional theoretical assumptions are infeasible. A major theme of the discussion was the importance of model assumptions in innovative designs. Questions were raised about the sensitivity of results to these assumptions and the robustness of methods, particularly under limited sample sizes. Addressing this requires extensive simulation studies across varied scenarios to assess operating characteristics. The focus should be on achieving clinically meaningful goals-such as identifying effective dose regions-rather than perfect model specification. Speakers emphasized the need to acknowledge and, when feasible, test assumptions post hoc, integrating such verification as secondary objectives in trial design. An iterative scientific process was encouraged, recognizing that trials not only serve immediate clinical goals but also advance broader scientific understanding. Assumptions provide a principled foundation for methodology, but thoughtful scrutiny of their realism was urged, given the risk of relying on overly strong or untestable premises. The potential of metaheuristic algorithms was highlighted for efficiently identifying optimal designs across different model assumptions, supporting robustness evaluations. Practical implementation should adapt optimal designs to stakeholder needs while preserving acceptable statistical efficiency. In sum, advancing the adoption of innovative designs requires improved communication, infrastructure, and methodological transparency, alongside careful evaluation of model assumptions and robustness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17407745251350598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745251350598\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745251350598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用创新的、基于模型的和计算密集型的临床试验设计面临着包括临床医生参与、监管接受、主要研究机构以外的传播和患者累积等障碍的挑战。这次会议探讨了克服这些障碍的战略。会议讨论的主要方法包括开发用户友好的软件和互动平台,以提高透明度、公开分享算法,以及认可软件在学术出版中的贡献。强调与倾向于创新的利益相关者建立合作,促进跨学科交流,以及制作互补的方法和临床出版物是必不可少的步骤。小样本量试验的实际考虑包括使用自适应设计、个性化试验和当传统理论假设不可行时的替代优化策略。讨论的一个主要主题是模型假设在创新设计中的重要性。有人提出了关于结果对这些假设的敏感性和方法的稳健性的问题,特别是在有限的样本量下。为了解决这个问题,需要在不同的场景中进行广泛的模拟研究,以评估操作特性。重点应该放在实现有临床意义的目标上,比如确定有效剂量区域,而不是完善模型规格。发言者强调有必要承认并在可行的情况下对事后假设进行检验,将这种核查作为试验设计的次要目标。鼓励反复的科学过程,认识到试验不仅服务于直接的临床目标,而且促进更广泛的科学理解。假设为方法论提供了一个原则性的基础,但考虑到依赖过于强大或不可检验的前提的风险,对其现实性进行深思熟虑的审查是迫切需要的。强调了元启发式算法的潜力,可以有效地识别不同模型假设下的最优设计,支持鲁棒性评估。实际实施应使最佳设计适应利益相关者的需求,同时保持可接受的统计效率。总而言之,推进创新设计的采用需要改进沟通、基础设施和方法透明度,以及对模型假设和稳健性的仔细评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Afternoon discussion: Statistical issues in clinical trials conference on dose finding.

The adoption of innovative, model-based, and computationally intensive clinical trial designs is challenged by barriers including clinician engagement, regulatory acceptance, dissemination beyond major research institutions, and patient accrual. This session explored strategies to overcome these barriers. Key approaches discussed included the development of user-friendly software and interactive platforms to enhance transparency, open sharing of algorithms, and recognition of software contributions in academic publishing. Building collaborations with stakeholders predisposed to innovation, fostering interdisciplinary communication, and producing complementary methodological and clinical publications were emphasized as essential steps. Practical considerations for trials with small sample sizes included the use of adaptive designs, individualized trials, and alternative optimization strategies when traditional theoretical assumptions are infeasible. A major theme of the discussion was the importance of model assumptions in innovative designs. Questions were raised about the sensitivity of results to these assumptions and the robustness of methods, particularly under limited sample sizes. Addressing this requires extensive simulation studies across varied scenarios to assess operating characteristics. The focus should be on achieving clinically meaningful goals-such as identifying effective dose regions-rather than perfect model specification. Speakers emphasized the need to acknowledge and, when feasible, test assumptions post hoc, integrating such verification as secondary objectives in trial design. An iterative scientific process was encouraged, recognizing that trials not only serve immediate clinical goals but also advance broader scientific understanding. Assumptions provide a principled foundation for methodology, but thoughtful scrutiny of their realism was urged, given the risk of relying on overly strong or untestable premises. The potential of metaheuristic algorithms was highlighted for efficiently identifying optimal designs across different model assumptions, supporting robustness evaluations. Practical implementation should adapt optimal designs to stakeholder needs while preserving acceptable statistical efficiency. In sum, advancing the adoption of innovative designs requires improved communication, infrastructure, and methodological transparency, alongside careful evaluation of model assumptions and robustness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Trials
Clinical Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信