两项随机、开放标签、多剂量、交叉的I期研究调查了外用双氯芬酸二乙胺凝胶与口服双氯芬酸片的全身生物利用度。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Grit Andersen, Frédérique Bariguian Revel, Marianna Armogida
{"title":"两项随机、开放标签、多剂量、交叉的I期研究调查了外用双氯芬酸二乙胺凝胶与口服双氯芬酸片的全身生物利用度。","authors":"Grit Andersen,&nbsp;Frédérique Bariguian Revel,&nbsp;Marianna Armogida","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Topical diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) gels relieve pain while maintaining low diclofenac systemic concentrations in nontarget tissues. Characterizing diclofenac systemic exposure remains a mandated element in the development of topical diclofenac products. Two Phase I, randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, crossover studies were conducted with the objective of assessing the systemic bioavailability of DDEA topical gels and oral diclofenac tablets in healthy volunteers. In addition to evaluating bioavailability, safety and tolerability were also examined. In Study 1, participants applied DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily (with/without semiocclusive bandage) or DDEA 1.16% gel 4 times daily (no bandage) to 1 ankle. In Study 2, participants applied DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily to 1 knee or both knees. Both studies compared topical treatments with oral diclofenac sodium tablets 50 mg 3 times daily. In Study 1, similar diclofenac bioavailabilities were observed for DDEA 1.16% gel 4 times daily and DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily; the presence of a semiocclusive bandage had a minimal impact on bioavailability. In Study 2, diclofenac bioavailability was proportional to the number of DDEA 2.32% gel application sites. Systemic diclofenac concentration for topical application was significantly lower (up to 150- and 75-fold) compared to oral treatments and was well tolerated. These studies contribute to the benefit–risk assessment of topical DDEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 9","pages":"688-699"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Crossover Studies Investigating the Systemic Bioavailability of Topical Diclofenac Diethylamine Gels Compared With Oral Diclofenac Tablets\",\"authors\":\"Grit Andersen,&nbsp;Frédérique Bariguian Revel,&nbsp;Marianna Armogida\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Topical diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) gels relieve pain while maintaining low diclofenac systemic concentrations in nontarget tissues. Characterizing diclofenac systemic exposure remains a mandated element in the development of topical diclofenac products. Two Phase I, randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, crossover studies were conducted with the objective of assessing the systemic bioavailability of DDEA topical gels and oral diclofenac tablets in healthy volunteers. In addition to evaluating bioavailability, safety and tolerability were also examined. In Study 1, participants applied DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily (with/without semiocclusive bandage) or DDEA 1.16% gel 4 times daily (no bandage) to 1 ankle. In Study 2, participants applied DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily to 1 knee or both knees. Both studies compared topical treatments with oral diclofenac sodium tablets 50 mg 3 times daily. In Study 1, similar diclofenac bioavailabilities were observed for DDEA 1.16% gel 4 times daily and DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily; the presence of a semiocclusive bandage had a minimal impact on bioavailability. In Study 2, diclofenac bioavailability was proportional to the number of DDEA 2.32% gel application sites. Systemic diclofenac concentration for topical application was significantly lower (up to 150- and 75-fold) compared to oral treatments and was well tolerated. These studies contribute to the benefit–risk assessment of topical DDEA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"688-699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

局部双氯芬酸二乙胺(DDEA)凝胶可缓解疼痛,同时在非靶组织中维持低双氯芬酸全身浓度。表征双氯芬酸全身暴露仍然是局部双氯芬酸产品开发的一个强制性因素。进行了两项随机、开放标签、多剂量、交叉的I期研究,目的是评估DDEA外用凝胶和口服双氯芬酸片在健康志愿者中的全身生物利用度。除了评估生物利用度外,还检查了安全性和耐受性。在研究1中,参与者将DDEA 2.32%凝胶每天2次(带/不带半封闭绷带)或DDEA 1.16%凝胶每天4次(不带绷带)涂抹在一个脚踝上。在研究2中,参与者将2.32%的DDEA凝胶涂抹在单膝或双膝上,每天两次。两项研究都比较了局部治疗与口服双氯芬酸钠片50毫克,每日3次。在研究1中,DDEA 1.16%凝胶剂和DDEA 2.32%凝胶剂的双氯芬酸生物利用度相似,每日4次;半封闭绷带的存在对生物利用度的影响很小。在研究2中,双氯芬酸的生物利用度与DDEA 2.32%凝胶应用位点的数量成正比。与口服治疗相比,局部应用的全身双氯芬酸浓度显着降低(高达150和75倍),并且耐受性良好。这些研究有助于局部DDEA的获益-风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Two Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Crossover Studies Investigating the Systemic Bioavailability of Topical Diclofenac Diethylamine Gels Compared With Oral Diclofenac Tablets

Two Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Crossover Studies Investigating the Systemic Bioavailability of Topical Diclofenac Diethylamine Gels Compared With Oral Diclofenac Tablets

Two Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Crossover Studies Investigating the Systemic Bioavailability of Topical Diclofenac Diethylamine Gels Compared With Oral Diclofenac Tablets

Two Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Crossover Studies Investigating the Systemic Bioavailability of Topical Diclofenac Diethylamine Gels Compared With Oral Diclofenac Tablets

Topical diclofenac diethylamine (DDEA) gels relieve pain while maintaining low diclofenac systemic concentrations in nontarget tissues. Characterizing diclofenac systemic exposure remains a mandated element in the development of topical diclofenac products. Two Phase I, randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, crossover studies were conducted with the objective of assessing the systemic bioavailability of DDEA topical gels and oral diclofenac tablets in healthy volunteers. In addition to evaluating bioavailability, safety and tolerability were also examined. In Study 1, participants applied DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily (with/without semiocclusive bandage) or DDEA 1.16% gel 4 times daily (no bandage) to 1 ankle. In Study 2, participants applied DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily to 1 knee or both knees. Both studies compared topical treatments with oral diclofenac sodium tablets 50 mg 3 times daily. In Study 1, similar diclofenac bioavailabilities were observed for DDEA 1.16% gel 4 times daily and DDEA 2.32% gel twice daily; the presence of a semiocclusive bandage had a minimal impact on bioavailability. In Study 2, diclofenac bioavailability was proportional to the number of DDEA 2.32% gel application sites. Systemic diclofenac concentration for topical application was significantly lower (up to 150- and 75-fold) compared to oral treatments and was well tolerated. These studies contribute to the benefit–risk assessment of topical DDEA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信