基于mri的前列腺癌风险计算器在澳大利亚队列中的外部验证。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Nicole Williams, Sebastiaan Remmers, Alex Jay, Kerry Santoro, Michael O'Callaghan
{"title":"基于mri的前列腺癌风险计算器在澳大利亚队列中的外部验证。","authors":"Nicole Williams, Sebastiaan Remmers, Alex Jay, Kerry Santoro, Michael O'Callaghan","doi":"10.1111/ans.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate cancer risk calculators in an Australian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively collected from patients biopsied at SALHN from May 2018 to March 2023. Men with MRI-suspicious lesions underwent biopsy. Performance of nine risk calculators was evaluated by discrimination, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and recalibration. Subgroup analysis of biopsy-naïve patients was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two percent had clinically significant cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group ≥ 2). Median age of 67 years (IQR 62-67), PSA 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.3-11) and prostate volume 45 mL (IQR 32 mL-67 mL) were observed. Abnormal DRE was recorded in 47%, and in 65% a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score of > 4 was observed. The RPCRC and Mehralivand risk calculators demonstrated the best performance, with the Radtke risk calculator demonstrating adequate performance in the biopsy naïve subgroup analysis. DCA demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12% of biopsies at a 15% risk threshold prior to recalibration. With recalibration, a net benefit of up to 6% at a 15% risk threshold was demonstrated. Analyses demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12.5% both pre and post recalibration in biopsy naïve patients. Discriminative ability was at least > 0.79, with most demonstrating discriminative ability > 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of prostate biopsy decision-making tools provides avenues for individualized health care based on patient-specific risk factors. This study has successfully completed external validation of nine risk calculators, with one demonstrating adequate discriminatory capacity in all patients and three in biopsy-naïve patients. Systemic use may have a 12% net clinical benefit amongst biopsy-naïve patients, thereby reducing healthcare system burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of MRI-Based Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators in an Australian Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Williams, Sebastiaan Remmers, Alex Jay, Kerry Santoro, Michael O'Callaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ans.70211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate cancer risk calculators in an Australian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively collected from patients biopsied at SALHN from May 2018 to March 2023. Men with MRI-suspicious lesions underwent biopsy. Performance of nine risk calculators was evaluated by discrimination, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and recalibration. Subgroup analysis of biopsy-naïve patients was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two percent had clinically significant cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group ≥ 2). Median age of 67 years (IQR 62-67), PSA 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.3-11) and prostate volume 45 mL (IQR 32 mL-67 mL) were observed. Abnormal DRE was recorded in 47%, and in 65% a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score of > 4 was observed. The RPCRC and Mehralivand risk calculators demonstrated the best performance, with the Radtke risk calculator demonstrating adequate performance in the biopsy naïve subgroup analysis. DCA demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12% of biopsies at a 15% risk threshold prior to recalibration. With recalibration, a net benefit of up to 6% at a 15% risk threshold was demonstrated. Analyses demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12.5% both pre and post recalibration in biopsy naïve patients. Discriminative ability was at least > 0.79, with most demonstrating discriminative ability > 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of prostate biopsy decision-making tools provides avenues for individualized health care based on patient-specific risk factors. This study has successfully completed external validation of nine risk calculators, with one demonstrating adequate discriminatory capacity in all patients and three in biopsy-naïve patients. Systemic use may have a 12% net clinical benefit amongst biopsy-naïve patients, thereby reducing healthcare system burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在澳大利亚人群中验证基于磁共振成像(MRI)的前列腺癌风险计算器。方法:回顾性收集2018年5月至2023年3月SALHN活检患者的数据。有mri可疑病变的患者行活检。通过判别、决策曲线分析(DCA)、校准和再校准来评估9种风险计算器的性能。对biopsy-naïve患者进行亚组分析。结果:52%的患者有临床意义的癌症(国际泌尿病理学会[ISUP]分级组≥2)。中位年龄67岁(IQR 62-67), PSA 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.3-11),前列腺体积45 mL (IQR 32 mL-67 mL)。47%的患者DRE异常,65%的患者前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分为bb0.4。RPCRC和Mehralivand风险计算器表现出最好的性能,Radtke风险计算器在活检naïve亚组分析中表现出足够的性能。在重新校准前的15%风险阈值下,DCA显示出高达12%的活检净收益。通过重新校准,在15%的风险阈值下,净收益高达6%。分析表明,在活检naïve患者中,重新校准前后的净收益高达12.5%。辨别能力至少为> 0.79,多数表现为> 0.82。结论:前列腺活检决策工具的使用为基于患者特定危险因素的个性化医疗保健提供了途径。本研究成功地完成了9个风险计算器的外部验证,其中1个在所有患者中显示足够的区分能力,3个在biopsy-naïve患者中显示足够的区分能力。在biopsy-naïve患者中,系统使用可能有12%的净临床效益,从而减轻医疗保健系统的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External Validation of MRI-Based Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators in an Australian Cohort.

Objective: To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate cancer risk calculators in an Australian population.

Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from patients biopsied at SALHN from May 2018 to March 2023. Men with MRI-suspicious lesions underwent biopsy. Performance of nine risk calculators was evaluated by discrimination, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and recalibration. Subgroup analysis of biopsy-naïve patients was conducted.

Results: Fifty-two percent had clinically significant cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group ≥ 2). Median age of 67 years (IQR 62-67), PSA 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.3-11) and prostate volume 45 mL (IQR 32 mL-67 mL) were observed. Abnormal DRE was recorded in 47%, and in 65% a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score of > 4 was observed. The RPCRC and Mehralivand risk calculators demonstrated the best performance, with the Radtke risk calculator demonstrating adequate performance in the biopsy naïve subgroup analysis. DCA demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12% of biopsies at a 15% risk threshold prior to recalibration. With recalibration, a net benefit of up to 6% at a 15% risk threshold was demonstrated. Analyses demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12.5% both pre and post recalibration in biopsy naïve patients. Discriminative ability was at least > 0.79, with most demonstrating discriminative ability > 0.82.

Conclusion: Use of prostate biopsy decision-making tools provides avenues for individualized health care based on patient-specific risk factors. This study has successfully completed external validation of nine risk calculators, with one demonstrating adequate discriminatory capacity in all patients and three in biopsy-naïve patients. Systemic use may have a 12% net clinical benefit amongst biopsy-naïve patients, thereby reducing healthcare system burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信