非治愈性治疗及其对骨髓增生异常综合征患者预后的影响——回顾性配对分析

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Annals of Hematology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1007/s00277-025-06485-w
Katharina Anna Rauhe, Annika Kasprzak, Felicitas Schulz, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Corinna Strupp, Andrea Kündgen, Sascha Dietrich, Karin Mayer, Katharina S Götze, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Norbert Gattermann, Ulrich Germing
{"title":"非治愈性治疗及其对骨髓增生异常综合征患者预后的影响——回顾性配对分析","authors":"Katharina Anna Rauhe, Annika Kasprzak, Felicitas Schulz, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Corinna Strupp, Andrea Kündgen, Sascha Dietrich, Karin Mayer, Katharina S Götze, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Norbert Gattermann, Ulrich Germing","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06485-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Due to age, comorbidities, or lack of urgency, many receive only palliative therapies to improve quality of life. Some patients remain untreated due to a lack of symptoms or low progression risk. Data on the impact of palliative therapies on overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) are limited. Using the Düsseldorf MDS Registry, we compared outcomes of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) alone to the outcome of patients receiving RBCT combined with iron chelation therapy (ICT), erythropoietin (EPO), antithymoglobulin (ATG), or lenalidomide (LENA). Matched-pairs analysis was conducted using age, gender, and prognostic scores (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-specific Prognostic Scoring System). ICT-treated patients (n = 85) had significantly improved OS (70 vs. 21 months, p < 0.001) and lower 5-year AML progression (3.5% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.001). Similar benefits were seen with EPO (n = 210; OS: 63 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001; AML: 5.7% vs. 19%, p = 0.007) and LENA (n = 30; OS: 92 vs. 57 months, p = 0.049; AML: 0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.024). ATG (n = 11) showed no significant improvement in OS (79 vs. 64 months) or AML progression (0% vs. 18.2%). While recognizing the limitations of matched-pairs analysis versus randomized trials, our findings indicate a survival benefit from ICT, EPO, or LENA versus RBCT alone. The year of diagnosis did not independently affect OS or LFS. These results support the use of selected palliative therapies to improve long-term outcomes in MDS patients. KEY POINTS: Treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with non-curative therapies beyond red blood cell transfusions like iron chelation therapy, erythropoietin, or lenalidomide has a positive impact on overall survival and leukemia-free survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"3281-3288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-curative therapies and their impact on the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes- a retrospective matched-pairs analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Anna Rauhe, Annika Kasprzak, Felicitas Schulz, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Corinna Strupp, Andrea Kündgen, Sascha Dietrich, Karin Mayer, Katharina S Götze, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Norbert Gattermann, Ulrich Germing\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-025-06485-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Due to age, comorbidities, or lack of urgency, many receive only palliative therapies to improve quality of life. Some patients remain untreated due to a lack of symptoms or low progression risk. Data on the impact of palliative therapies on overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) are limited. Using the Düsseldorf MDS Registry, we compared outcomes of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) alone to the outcome of patients receiving RBCT combined with iron chelation therapy (ICT), erythropoietin (EPO), antithymoglobulin (ATG), or lenalidomide (LENA). Matched-pairs analysis was conducted using age, gender, and prognostic scores (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-specific Prognostic Scoring System). ICT-treated patients (n = 85) had significantly improved OS (70 vs. 21 months, p < 0.001) and lower 5-year AML progression (3.5% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.001). Similar benefits were seen with EPO (n = 210; OS: 63 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001; AML: 5.7% vs. 19%, p = 0.007) and LENA (n = 30; OS: 92 vs. 57 months, p = 0.049; AML: 0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.024). ATG (n = 11) showed no significant improvement in OS (79 vs. 64 months) or AML progression (0% vs. 18.2%). While recognizing the limitations of matched-pairs analysis versus randomized trials, our findings indicate a survival benefit from ICT, EPO, or LENA versus RBCT alone. The year of diagnosis did not independently affect OS or LFS. These results support the use of selected palliative therapies to improve long-term outcomes in MDS patients. KEY POINTS: Treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with non-curative therapies beyond red blood cell transfusions like iron chelation therapy, erythropoietin, or lenalidomide has a positive impact on overall survival and leukemia-free survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3281-3288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06485-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06485-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同种异体干细胞移植(SCT)仍然是高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者唯一的治疗方法。由于年龄,合并症,或缺乏紧迫性,许多只接受姑息治疗,以提高生活质量。一些患者由于缺乏症状或进展风险低而未得到治疗。关于姑息治疗对总生存期(OS)和无白血病生存期(LFS)影响的数据有限。使用d sseldorf MDS Registry,我们比较了单独接受红细胞输注(RBCT)的患者与接受RBCT联合铁螯合治疗(ICT)、促红细胞生成素(EPO)、抗胸腺球蛋白(ATG)或来那度胺(LENA)的患者的结果。使用年龄、性别和预后评分(修订的国际预后评分系统或慢性粒细胞白血病特异性预后评分系统)进行配对分析。接受ict治疗的患者(n = 85)的OS显著改善(70个月vs 21个月,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-curative therapies and their impact on the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes- a retrospective matched-pairs analysis.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Due to age, comorbidities, or lack of urgency, many receive only palliative therapies to improve quality of life. Some patients remain untreated due to a lack of symptoms or low progression risk. Data on the impact of palliative therapies on overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) are limited. Using the Düsseldorf MDS Registry, we compared outcomes of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) alone to the outcome of patients receiving RBCT combined with iron chelation therapy (ICT), erythropoietin (EPO), antithymoglobulin (ATG), or lenalidomide (LENA). Matched-pairs analysis was conducted using age, gender, and prognostic scores (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-specific Prognostic Scoring System). ICT-treated patients (n = 85) had significantly improved OS (70 vs. 21 months, p < 0.001) and lower 5-year AML progression (3.5% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.001). Similar benefits were seen with EPO (n = 210; OS: 63 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001; AML: 5.7% vs. 19%, p = 0.007) and LENA (n = 30; OS: 92 vs. 57 months, p = 0.049; AML: 0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.024). ATG (n = 11) showed no significant improvement in OS (79 vs. 64 months) or AML progression (0% vs. 18.2%). While recognizing the limitations of matched-pairs analysis versus randomized trials, our findings indicate a survival benefit from ICT, EPO, or LENA versus RBCT alone. The year of diagnosis did not independently affect OS or LFS. These results support the use of selected palliative therapies to improve long-term outcomes in MDS patients. KEY POINTS: Treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with non-curative therapies beyond red blood cell transfusions like iron chelation therapy, erythropoietin, or lenalidomide has a positive impact on overall survival and leukemia-free survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信