主观认知能力下降、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症的经济负担:超额费用及相关临床和风险因素

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eva Gläser, Ingo Kilimann, Moritz Platen, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Frederic Brosseron, Katharina Buerger, Marie Coenjaerts, Emrah Düzel, Michael Ewers, Klaus Fliessbach, Ingo Frommann, Maria Gemenetzi, Wenzel Glanz, Julian Hellmann-Regen, Enise I Incesoy, Daniel Janowitz, Frank Jessen, Oliver Peters, Josef Priller, Alfredo Ramirez, Anja Schneider, Annika Spottke, Eike Jakob Spruth, Stefan Teipel, Michael Wagner, Bernhard Michalowsky
{"title":"主观认知能力下降、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症的经济负担:超额费用及相关临床和风险因素","authors":"Eva Gläser, Ingo Kilimann, Moritz Platen, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Frederic Brosseron, Katharina Buerger, Marie Coenjaerts, Emrah Düzel, Michael Ewers, Klaus Fliessbach, Ingo Frommann, Maria Gemenetzi, Wenzel Glanz, Julian Hellmann-Regen, Enise I Incesoy, Daniel Janowitz, Frank Jessen, Oliver Peters, Josef Priller, Alfredo Ramirez, Anja Schneider, Annika Spottke, Eike Jakob Spruth, Stefan Teipel, Michael Wagner, Bernhard Michalowsky","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01785-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the availability of first disease-modifying treatments, evidence on costs across the entire Alzheimer's Continuum, especially for early disease stages, becomes increasingly important to inform healthcare planning, resource allocation, and policy decisions. This study assessed costs and cost-associated factors in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dementia compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The German DELCODE cohort study assessed clinical data, healthcare resource use, and informal care provision. Costs were calculated from payer and societal perspectives using standardized unit costs, and multivariate regression analyses identified cost-associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a payer perspective, costs were elevated by 26% for SCD (adjusted mean 5,976€ [95%CI 4,598-7,355€]), 85% for MCI (8,795€ [6,200-11,391€]) and 36% for AD (6,454€ [2,796-10,111€]) compared to controls (4,754€ [3,586-5,922€]). Societal costs were elevated by 52% for SCD (adjusted mean 8,377€ [95%CI 6,009-10,746€]), 170% for MCI (14,886€ [9,524-20,248€]) and 307% for AD (22,481€ [9,994-34,969€]) compared to controls (5,522€ [3,814-7,230€]). APOE e4 negative patients showed higher costs compared to APOE e4 positive patients. Hypertension was associated with higher costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare costs are already elevated in early subjective and objective cognitive impairment, driven by formal and informal care. The study emphasizes the importance of early interventions to reduce the economic burden and delay progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic burden of subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia: excess costs and associated clinical and risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Gläser, Ingo Kilimann, Moritz Platen, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Frederic Brosseron, Katharina Buerger, Marie Coenjaerts, Emrah Düzel, Michael Ewers, Klaus Fliessbach, Ingo Frommann, Maria Gemenetzi, Wenzel Glanz, Julian Hellmann-Regen, Enise I Incesoy, Daniel Janowitz, Frank Jessen, Oliver Peters, Josef Priller, Alfredo Ramirez, Anja Schneider, Annika Spottke, Eike Jakob Spruth, Stefan Teipel, Michael Wagner, Bernhard Michalowsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-025-01785-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the availability of first disease-modifying treatments, evidence on costs across the entire Alzheimer's Continuum, especially for early disease stages, becomes increasingly important to inform healthcare planning, resource allocation, and policy decisions. This study assessed costs and cost-associated factors in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dementia compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The German DELCODE cohort study assessed clinical data, healthcare resource use, and informal care provision. Costs were calculated from payer and societal perspectives using standardized unit costs, and multivariate regression analyses identified cost-associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a payer perspective, costs were elevated by 26% for SCD (adjusted mean 5,976€ [95%CI 4,598-7,355€]), 85% for MCI (8,795€ [6,200-11,391€]) and 36% for AD (6,454€ [2,796-10,111€]) compared to controls (4,754€ [3,586-5,922€]). Societal costs were elevated by 52% for SCD (adjusted mean 8,377€ [95%CI 6,009-10,746€]), 170% for MCI (14,886€ [9,524-20,248€]) and 307% for AD (22,481€ [9,994-34,969€]) compared to controls (5,522€ [3,814-7,230€]). APOE e4 negative patients showed higher costs compared to APOE e4 positive patients. Hypertension was associated with higher costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare costs are already elevated in early subjective and objective cognitive impairment, driven by formal and informal care. The study emphasizes the importance of early interventions to reduce the economic burden and delay progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01785-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01785-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着首次疾病改善治疗的可用性,整个阿尔茨海默病连续体的成本证据,特别是早期疾病阶段的成本证据,对于告知医疗保健计划、资源分配和政策决策变得越来越重要。本研究评估了与健康对照组相比,主观认知能力下降(SCD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆患者的成本和成本相关因素。方法:德国DELCODE队列研究评估临床数据、医疗资源使用和非正式护理提供。使用标准化单位成本从支付方和社会角度计算成本,并通过多元回归分析确定了与成本相关的因素。结果:从支付款人的角度来看,与对照组(4754欧元[3586 - 5922欧元])相比,SCD的成本增加了26%(调整后平均5,976欧元[95%CI 4,598-7,355欧元]),MCI的成本增加了85%(8,795欧元[6,200-11,391欧元]),AD的成本增加了36%(6,454欧元[2,796-10,111欧元])。与对照组(5,522欧元[3,814-7,230欧元])相比,SCD的社会成本增加了52%(调整后平均8,377欧元[95%CI 6,009-10,746欧元]),MCI的社会成本增加了170%(14,886欧元[9,524-20,248欧元]),AD的社会成本增加了307%(22,481欧元[9,994-34,969欧元])。APOE e4阴性患者的费用高于APOE e4阳性患者。高血压与较高的医疗费用有关。结论:在正式和非正式护理的驱动下,早期主观和客观认知障碍患者的医疗费用已经升高。该研究强调了早期干预对减轻经济负担和延缓病情发展的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The economic burden of subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia: excess costs and associated clinical and risk factors.

Background: With the availability of first disease-modifying treatments, evidence on costs across the entire Alzheimer's Continuum, especially for early disease stages, becomes increasingly important to inform healthcare planning, resource allocation, and policy decisions. This study assessed costs and cost-associated factors in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dementia compared to healthy controls.

Methods: The German DELCODE cohort study assessed clinical data, healthcare resource use, and informal care provision. Costs were calculated from payer and societal perspectives using standardized unit costs, and multivariate regression analyses identified cost-associated factors.

Results: From a payer perspective, costs were elevated by 26% for SCD (adjusted mean 5,976€ [95%CI 4,598-7,355€]), 85% for MCI (8,795€ [6,200-11,391€]) and 36% for AD (6,454€ [2,796-10,111€]) compared to controls (4,754€ [3,586-5,922€]). Societal costs were elevated by 52% for SCD (adjusted mean 8,377€ [95%CI 6,009-10,746€]), 170% for MCI (14,886€ [9,524-20,248€]) and 307% for AD (22,481€ [9,994-34,969€]) compared to controls (5,522€ [3,814-7,230€]). APOE e4 negative patients showed higher costs compared to APOE e4 positive patients. Hypertension was associated with higher costs.

Conclusions: Healthcare costs are already elevated in early subjective and objective cognitive impairment, driven by formal and informal care. The study emphasizes the importance of early interventions to reduce the economic burden and delay progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信