幻觉悖论:萨特式的升级版

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Pub Date : 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf233
Margherita Arcangeli, Paolo Bartolomeo
{"title":"幻觉悖论:萨特式的升级版","authors":"Margherita Arcangeli, Paolo Bartolomeo","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuroscientific research into mental imagery often relies on David Hume’s view of visual imagination as weak perception. Arcangeli & Bartolomeo argue that Jean-Paul Sartre’s alternative framework—supported by recent findings on aphantasia—offers a more conceptually and empirically robust approach.","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The aphantasia paradox: a Sartrean update\",\"authors\":\"Margherita Arcangeli, Paolo Bartolomeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/brain/awaf233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neuroscientific research into mental imagery often relies on David Hume’s view of visual imagination as weak perception. Arcangeli & Bartolomeo argue that Jean-Paul Sartre’s alternative framework—supported by recent findings on aphantasia—offers a more conceptually and empirically robust approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对心理意象的神经科学研究常常依赖于大卫·休谟关于视觉想象是弱知觉的观点。Arcangeli,Bartolomeo认为让-保罗·萨特的另一种框架——得到了最近关于幻觉的研究结果的支持——提供了一种更概念化和经验化的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The aphantasia paradox: a Sartrean update
Neuroscientific research into mental imagery often relies on David Hume’s view of visual imagination as weak perception. Arcangeli & Bartolomeo argue that Jean-Paul Sartre’s alternative framework—supported by recent findings on aphantasia—offers a more conceptually and empirically robust approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信