P-524年龄对性别认同发展和生育能力保持的里程碑时间的影响

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
T Seeland, A L Zippl, D Riedl, B Toth, K Feil
{"title":"P-524年龄对性别认同发展和生育能力保持的里程碑时间的影响","authors":"T Seeland, A L Zippl, D Riedl, B Toth, K Feil","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study question This study aims to investigate whether the age of milestones in gender identity development (GID) varies between generational cohorts. Summary answer Generational cohort influences the age of reaching milestones in gender identity development (e.g. coming out). What is known already Socio-economic changes and evolving societal perceptions of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals have had a significant impact on the trajectories of GID among younger generations. Factors such as increased access to genderaffirming healthcare and positive media representation have likely contributed to earlier gender identity awareness among younger TGD individuals. This may subsequently influence key milestones in GID, including coming out and initiating hormone therapy. Study design, size, duration Data for the study was collected between 2017 and 2021 at a single center. The study, which used the Innsbrucker Transgender Quality of Life during Hormone Therapy Questionnaire (iTransQoL), included 212 participants. Participants/materials, setting, methods 212 participants who (a) were at least 18 years old, (b) identified as TGD, and (c) provided informed consent were included in the analysis. Participants were categorised by generational cohort and gender identity. Participants were categorised into four generational cohorts: Generation Z (born 1997-2012, n = 97), Millennials (born 1981-1996, n = 85), Generation X (born 1965-1980, n = 24), and Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964, n = 6). The study sample included 115 trans men, 90 trans women, and 7 non-binary individuals. Main results and the role of chance Compared to older cohorts, younger generations, particularly Generation Z, reported significantly earlier onset of key GID milestones. Generation Z expressed a first desire to transition at 12.4 ± 4.7 years, compared to 40.8 ±22.0 years for Baby Boomers. Furthermore, Generation Z exhibited a shorter interval between the first desire to transition and coming out (4.3 ±3.9 years) than Millennials (8.3 ±7.4 years). A notable intergenerational difference emerged in the distribution of gender identity. Generation Z demonstrated a higher prevalence of trans men, with 66.0% self-identifying as such, compared to 29.2% in Generation X and only 16.7% in Baby Boomers. There was a significant disparity in the use of fertility preservation measures between trans men and women. While 23.6% of trans women used such measures, this figure was significantly lower for transmen at 3.7%. Limitations, reasons for caution Only TGD individuals starting hormone therapy were included in this study, which reduced our study population. Still prevalent discrimination against non-binary individuals in healthcare may have resulted in a small number of non-binary individuals. Wider implications of the findings This study highlights the intergenerational differences in the timing of key GID milestones for TGD individuals. This may reflect progress in the visibility of TGD individuals and their experiences, as well as access to gender-affirming healthcare for TGD individuals. Trial registration number No","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P-524 The influence of age on the timing of milestones in gender identity development and fertility preservation\",\"authors\":\"T Seeland, A L Zippl, D Riedl, B Toth, K Feil\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Study question This study aims to investigate whether the age of milestones in gender identity development (GID) varies between generational cohorts. Summary answer Generational cohort influences the age of reaching milestones in gender identity development (e.g. coming out). What is known already Socio-economic changes and evolving societal perceptions of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals have had a significant impact on the trajectories of GID among younger generations. Factors such as increased access to genderaffirming healthcare and positive media representation have likely contributed to earlier gender identity awareness among younger TGD individuals. This may subsequently influence key milestones in GID, including coming out and initiating hormone therapy. Study design, size, duration Data for the study was collected between 2017 and 2021 at a single center. The study, which used the Innsbrucker Transgender Quality of Life during Hormone Therapy Questionnaire (iTransQoL), included 212 participants. Participants/materials, setting, methods 212 participants who (a) were at least 18 years old, (b) identified as TGD, and (c) provided informed consent were included in the analysis. Participants were categorised by generational cohort and gender identity. Participants were categorised into four generational cohorts: Generation Z (born 1997-2012, n = 97), Millennials (born 1981-1996, n = 85), Generation X (born 1965-1980, n = 24), and Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964, n = 6). The study sample included 115 trans men, 90 trans women, and 7 non-binary individuals. Main results and the role of chance Compared to older cohorts, younger generations, particularly Generation Z, reported significantly earlier onset of key GID milestones. Generation Z expressed a first desire to transition at 12.4 ± 4.7 years, compared to 40.8 ±22.0 years for Baby Boomers. Furthermore, Generation Z exhibited a shorter interval between the first desire to transition and coming out (4.3 ±3.9 years) than Millennials (8.3 ±7.4 years). A notable intergenerational difference emerged in the distribution of gender identity. Generation Z demonstrated a higher prevalence of trans men, with 66.0% self-identifying as such, compared to 29.2% in Generation X and only 16.7% in Baby Boomers. There was a significant disparity in the use of fertility preservation measures between trans men and women. While 23.6% of trans women used such measures, this figure was significantly lower for transmen at 3.7%. Limitations, reasons for caution Only TGD individuals starting hormone therapy were included in this study, which reduced our study population. Still prevalent discrimination against non-binary individuals in healthcare may have resulted in a small number of non-binary individuals. Wider implications of the findings This study highlights the intergenerational differences in the timing of key GID milestones for TGD individuals. This may reflect progress in the visibility of TGD individuals and their experiences, as well as access to gender-affirming healthcare for TGD individuals. Trial registration number No\",\"PeriodicalId\":13003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.830\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.830","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题本研究旨在探讨性别认同发展(GID)的里程碑年龄是否在代际队列中有所不同。代际队列影响性别认同发展中达到里程碑的年龄(例如出柜)。已知的社会经济变化和不断变化的社会对跨性别者和性别多样化(TGD)个体的看法对年轻一代的性别认知障碍的发展轨迹产生了重大影响。诸如增加获得性别肯定医疗保健的机会和积极的媒体报道等因素可能有助于年轻的TGD个体更早地意识到性别认同。这可能随后影响GID的关键里程碑,包括出柜和开始激素治疗。研究设计、规模、持续时间研究数据于2017年至2021年在单个中心收集。这项研究使用了Innsbrucker变性人激素治疗期间生活质量问卷(iTransQoL),包括212名参与者。受试者/材料、环境、方法212名受试者(a)年满18岁,(b)确诊为TGD, (c)提供知情同意。参与者按代际队列和性别身份进行分类。参与者被分为四个世代:Z世代(1997-2012年出生,n = 97)、千禧一代(1981-1996年出生,n = 85)、X世代(1965-1980年出生,n = 24)和婴儿潮一代(1946-1964年出生,n = 6)。研究样本包括115名跨性别男性、90名跨性别女性和7名非二元性别个体。主要结果和偶然性的作用与老年人相比,年轻一代,特别是Z一代,报告的关键GID里程碑的发病时间明显更早。Z一代在12.4±4.7岁时表达了第一次转变的愿望,而婴儿潮一代则为40.8±22.0岁。此外,Z一代从第一次渴望转变到出柜的时间间隔(4.3±3.9年)比千禧一代(8.3±7.4年)更短。在性别认同的分布上出现了显著的代际差异。Z世代的变性人比例更高,66.0%的人认为自己是变性人,而X世代为29.2%,婴儿潮一代仅为16.7%。跨性别男性和女性在使用生育保护措施方面存在显著差异。23.6%的跨性别女性使用了此类措施,而跨性别者的这一比例明显较低,为3.7%。本研究仅纳入了开始激素治疗的TGD患者,这减少了我们的研究人群。在医疗保健中仍然普遍存在的对非二元个体的歧视可能导致少数非二元个体。这项研究强调了TGD个体在关键的GID里程碑时间上的代际差异。这可能反映出变性妇女个人及其经历的可见度方面的进展,以及变性妇女个人获得性别确认保健的机会。试验注册号
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
P-524 The influence of age on the timing of milestones in gender identity development and fertility preservation
Study question This study aims to investigate whether the age of milestones in gender identity development (GID) varies between generational cohorts. Summary answer Generational cohort influences the age of reaching milestones in gender identity development (e.g. coming out). What is known already Socio-economic changes and evolving societal perceptions of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals have had a significant impact on the trajectories of GID among younger generations. Factors such as increased access to genderaffirming healthcare and positive media representation have likely contributed to earlier gender identity awareness among younger TGD individuals. This may subsequently influence key milestones in GID, including coming out and initiating hormone therapy. Study design, size, duration Data for the study was collected between 2017 and 2021 at a single center. The study, which used the Innsbrucker Transgender Quality of Life during Hormone Therapy Questionnaire (iTransQoL), included 212 participants. Participants/materials, setting, methods 212 participants who (a) were at least 18 years old, (b) identified as TGD, and (c) provided informed consent were included in the analysis. Participants were categorised by generational cohort and gender identity. Participants were categorised into four generational cohorts: Generation Z (born 1997-2012, n = 97), Millennials (born 1981-1996, n = 85), Generation X (born 1965-1980, n = 24), and Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964, n = 6). The study sample included 115 trans men, 90 trans women, and 7 non-binary individuals. Main results and the role of chance Compared to older cohorts, younger generations, particularly Generation Z, reported significantly earlier onset of key GID milestones. Generation Z expressed a first desire to transition at 12.4 ± 4.7 years, compared to 40.8 ±22.0 years for Baby Boomers. Furthermore, Generation Z exhibited a shorter interval between the first desire to transition and coming out (4.3 ±3.9 years) than Millennials (8.3 ±7.4 years). A notable intergenerational difference emerged in the distribution of gender identity. Generation Z demonstrated a higher prevalence of trans men, with 66.0% self-identifying as such, compared to 29.2% in Generation X and only 16.7% in Baby Boomers. There was a significant disparity in the use of fertility preservation measures between trans men and women. While 23.6% of trans women used such measures, this figure was significantly lower for transmen at 3.7%. Limitations, reasons for caution Only TGD individuals starting hormone therapy were included in this study, which reduced our study population. Still prevalent discrimination against non-binary individuals in healthcare may have resulted in a small number of non-binary individuals. Wider implications of the findings This study highlights the intergenerational differences in the timing of key GID milestones for TGD individuals. This may reflect progress in the visibility of TGD individuals and their experiences, as well as access to gender-affirming healthcare for TGD individuals. Trial registration number No
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信