可解释人工智能(XAI)技术在颅内出血患者中的应用:系统综述

Ali Kohan, Amir Zahedi, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Ru‐San Tan, U. Rajendra Acharya
{"title":"可解释人工智能(XAI)技术在颅内出血患者中的应用:系统综述","authors":"Ali Kohan, Amir Zahedi, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Ru‐San Tan, U. Rajendra Acharya","doi":"10.1002/widm.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intracranial hemorrhage (IH) is a critical condition requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to ensure effective treatment and reduce mortality rates. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) models have demonstrated significant potential in automating the detection and analysis of brain injuries in IH patients. However, the “black‐box” nature of many AI systems raises concerns about transparency, reliability, and clinical applicability. Explainable AI (XAI) addresses these challenges by making AI models more interpretable, allowing healthcare professionals to understand and trust the decision‐making processes. This review paper explores various XAI techniques—such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model‐Agnostic Explanations (LIME), Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation (RISE), Class Activation Mapping (CAM), and its variants—and their specific applications in IH clinical tasks. We systematically examine studies incorporating XAI for curing IH patients, highlighting how these methods enhance model transparency and support clinical decision‐making. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was employed to select the papers. Studies are categorized into those using tabular data and those using image data. The literature indicates a rapidly growing number of XAI publications in this field. SHAP is the most commonly used XAI method for tabular data, while CAM‐based methods, such as Grad‐CAM, dominate in image‐based applications. Furthermore, we discuss current limitations of XAI methods and future research directions. This review aims to provide researchers and clinicians with valuable insights into the role of XAI in improving the reliability and practical integration of AI‐driven tools for IH patient care.This article is categorized under: <jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Application Areas &gt; Health Care</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge &gt; Explainable AI</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Technologies &gt; Machine Learning</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501013,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Ali Kohan, Amir Zahedi, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Ru‐San Tan, U. Rajendra Acharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/widm.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intracranial hemorrhage (IH) is a critical condition requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to ensure effective treatment and reduce mortality rates. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) models have demonstrated significant potential in automating the detection and analysis of brain injuries in IH patients. However, the “black‐box” nature of many AI systems raises concerns about transparency, reliability, and clinical applicability. Explainable AI (XAI) addresses these challenges by making AI models more interpretable, allowing healthcare professionals to understand and trust the decision‐making processes. This review paper explores various XAI techniques—such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model‐Agnostic Explanations (LIME), Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation (RISE), Class Activation Mapping (CAM), and its variants—and their specific applications in IH clinical tasks. We systematically examine studies incorporating XAI for curing IH patients, highlighting how these methods enhance model transparency and support clinical decision‐making. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was employed to select the papers. Studies are categorized into those using tabular data and those using image data. The literature indicates a rapidly growing number of XAI publications in this field. SHAP is the most commonly used XAI method for tabular data, while CAM‐based methods, such as Grad‐CAM, dominate in image‐based applications. Furthermore, we discuss current limitations of XAI methods and future research directions. This review aims to provide researchers and clinicians with valuable insights into the role of XAI in improving the reliability and practical integration of AI‐driven tools for IH patient care.This article is categorized under: <jats:list list-type=\\\"simple\\\"> <jats:list-item>Application Areas &gt; Health Care</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge &gt; Explainable AI</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Technologies &gt; Machine Learning</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.70031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅内出血(IH)是一种危重疾病,需要快速准确的诊断,以确保有效治疗和降低死亡率。最近,人工智能(AI)模型在IH患者脑损伤的自动化检测和分析方面显示出巨大的潜力。然而,许多人工智能系统的“黑箱”性质引起了人们对透明度、可靠性和临床适用性的担忧。可解释人工智能(XAI)通过使人工智能模型更具可解释性来解决这些挑战,使医疗保健专业人员能够理解和信任决策过程。这篇综述论文探讨了各种XAI技术,如SHapley加性解释(SHAP)、局部可解释模型不确定解释(LIME)、随机输入解释抽样(RISE)、类激活映射(CAM)及其变体,以及它们在IH临床任务中的具体应用。我们系统地检查了结合XAI治疗IH患者的研究,强调了这些方法如何提高模型透明度和支持临床决策。采用系统评价和Meta分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法选择论文。研究分为使用表格数据和使用图像数据。文献表明,该领域的XAI出版物数量正在迅速增长。对于表格数据,SHAP是最常用的XAI方法,而基于CAM的方法,如Grad - CAM,在基于图像的应用中占主导地位。此外,我们还讨论了当前XAI方法的局限性和未来的研究方向。本综述旨在为研究人员和临床医生提供有价值的见解,以了解人工智能在提高人工智能驱动的IH患者护理工具的可靠性和实际集成方面的作用。本文分类如下:应用领域>;卫生保健数据与知识的基本概念可解释的人工智能技术机器学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review
Intracranial hemorrhage (IH) is a critical condition requiring rapid and accurate diagnosis to ensure effective treatment and reduce mortality rates. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) models have demonstrated significant potential in automating the detection and analysis of brain injuries in IH patients. However, the “black‐box” nature of many AI systems raises concerns about transparency, reliability, and clinical applicability. Explainable AI (XAI) addresses these challenges by making AI models more interpretable, allowing healthcare professionals to understand and trust the decision‐making processes. This review paper explores various XAI techniques—such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model‐Agnostic Explanations (LIME), Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation (RISE), Class Activation Mapping (CAM), and its variants—and their specific applications in IH clinical tasks. We systematically examine studies incorporating XAI for curing IH patients, highlighting how these methods enhance model transparency and support clinical decision‐making. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was employed to select the papers. Studies are categorized into those using tabular data and those using image data. The literature indicates a rapidly growing number of XAI publications in this field. SHAP is the most commonly used XAI method for tabular data, while CAM‐based methods, such as Grad‐CAM, dominate in image‐based applications. Furthermore, we discuss current limitations of XAI methods and future research directions. This review aims to provide researchers and clinicians with valuable insights into the role of XAI in improving the reliability and practical integration of AI‐driven tools for IH patient care.This article is categorized under: Application Areas > Health Care Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Explainable AI Technologies > Machine Learning
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信