基于锥束ct的放射治疗中前列腺运动和剂量畸变的估计

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Karolina A Klucznik , Thomas Ravkilde , Simon Skouboe , Ditte S Møller , Steffen Hokland , Paul Keall , Simon Buus , Lise Bentzen , Per R Poulsen
{"title":"基于锥束ct的放射治疗中前列腺运动和剂量畸变的估计","authors":"Karolina A Klucznik ,&nbsp;Thomas Ravkilde ,&nbsp;Simon Skouboe ,&nbsp;Ditte S Møller ,&nbsp;Steffen Hokland ,&nbsp;Paul Keall ,&nbsp;Simon Buus ,&nbsp;Lise Bentzen ,&nbsp;Per R Poulsen","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Intra-fractional prostate translational and rotational (6DoF) motion can cause dose distortions. As intra-fractional motion monitoring is often unavailable, this study compares three methods to use pre- and post-treatment cone beam CTs (CBCT) to estimate prostate positioning errors during treatment and their dosimetric impact.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>Eighteen patients received prostate radiotherapy with pre-treatment CBCT setup. For 7–10 fractions per patient (total:174), triggered kV-images were acquired every 3 s during beam-on and a CBCT was acquired post-treatment. The 6DoF prostate position error during treatment was determined from the kV-images (ground truth) and estimated from the CBCTs assuming a static position as in the pre-CBCT(Scenario1), a linear drift between pre- and post-CBCT position(Scenario2) or a static position as in the post-CBCT(Scenario3). The positioning errors and prostate dose from each scenario were compared with the ground truth.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Scenario1 was inferior to the others with prostate position root-mean-square errors of 1.1 mm(LR), 1.7 mm(AP) and 1.8 mm(CC). Scenario2 and 3 were similarly accurate with root-mean-square errors of 0.5 mm(LR), 0.9 mm(AP) and 0.8 mm(CC) (Scenario2) and 0.6 mm(LR), 1.1 mm(AP) and 0.9 mm(CC) (Scenario3). The prostate position errors reduced the CTV D<sub>99.5%</sub> by more than 2/3 % at 24/15 % of the fractions, respectively. The sensitivity in detecting these dose deficits was low for Scenario1 (9–16 %) and considerably higher for Scenario2 (68–76 %) and Scenario3 (86–91 %). All scenarios showed high specificity (93–99 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using the post-CBCT prostate position, acquired right after treatment, performed best in detecting intra-fractional prostate position errors and CTV dose deficits. It offers a scalable and conservative estimate of motion-induced dose distortions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100798"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone-beam CT-based estimations of prostate motion and dose distortion during radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Karolina A Klucznik ,&nbsp;Thomas Ravkilde ,&nbsp;Simon Skouboe ,&nbsp;Ditte S Møller ,&nbsp;Steffen Hokland ,&nbsp;Paul Keall ,&nbsp;Simon Buus ,&nbsp;Lise Bentzen ,&nbsp;Per R Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Intra-fractional prostate translational and rotational (6DoF) motion can cause dose distortions. As intra-fractional motion monitoring is often unavailable, this study compares three methods to use pre- and post-treatment cone beam CTs (CBCT) to estimate prostate positioning errors during treatment and their dosimetric impact.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>Eighteen patients received prostate radiotherapy with pre-treatment CBCT setup. For 7–10 fractions per patient (total:174), triggered kV-images were acquired every 3 s during beam-on and a CBCT was acquired post-treatment. The 6DoF prostate position error during treatment was determined from the kV-images (ground truth) and estimated from the CBCTs assuming a static position as in the pre-CBCT(Scenario1), a linear drift between pre- and post-CBCT position(Scenario2) or a static position as in the post-CBCT(Scenario3). The positioning errors and prostate dose from each scenario were compared with the ground truth.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Scenario1 was inferior to the others with prostate position root-mean-square errors of 1.1 mm(LR), 1.7 mm(AP) and 1.8 mm(CC). Scenario2 and 3 were similarly accurate with root-mean-square errors of 0.5 mm(LR), 0.9 mm(AP) and 0.8 mm(CC) (Scenario2) and 0.6 mm(LR), 1.1 mm(AP) and 0.9 mm(CC) (Scenario3). The prostate position errors reduced the CTV D<sub>99.5%</sub> by more than 2/3 % at 24/15 % of the fractions, respectively. The sensitivity in detecting these dose deficits was low for Scenario1 (9–16 %) and considerably higher for Scenario2 (68–76 %) and Scenario3 (86–91 %). All scenarios showed high specificity (93–99 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using the post-CBCT prostate position, acquired right after treatment, performed best in detecting intra-fractional prostate position errors and CTV dose deficits. It offers a scalable and conservative estimate of motion-induced dose distortions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:分节前列腺平移和旋转(6DoF)运动可引起剂量扭曲。由于分数内运动监测通常不可用,本研究比较了三种使用治疗前后锥形束ct (CBCT)来估计治疗期间前列腺定位误差及其剂量学影响的方法。材料与方法18例患者行前列腺放射治疗,术前设置CBCT。对于每个患者7-10个分数(总数:174),在光束照射期间每3秒获得触发的kv图像,并在治疗后获得CBCT。治疗期间的6DoF前列腺位置误差由kv图像(基础真值)确定,并根据cbct假设的静态位置(场景1)、cbct前后位置(场景2)之间的线性漂移或cbct后位置(场景3)中的静态位置来估计。将每种情况下的定位误差和前列腺剂量与地面真实值进行比较。结果scenario 1的前列腺位置均方根误差分别为1.1 mm(LR)、1.7 mm(AP)和1.8 mm(CC)。情景2和情景3同样准确,均方根误差分别为0.5 mm(LR)、0.9 mm(AP)和0.8 mm(CC)(情景2)和0.6 mm(LR)、1.1 mm(AP)和0.9 mm(CC)(情景3)。前列腺位置误差分别在24/ 15%的分数处使CTV D99.5%降低2/3 %以上。检测这些剂量亏缺的敏感性在场景1中较低(9 - 16%),而在场景2(68 - 76%)和场景3(86 - 91%)中相当高。所有情况均具有高特异性(93 - 99%)。结论使用治疗后立即获得的cbct后前列腺体位,在检测分段内前列腺体位错误和CTV剂量不足方面效果最好。它提供了一个可扩展的和保守的估计运动引起的剂量扭曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cone-beam CT-based estimations of prostate motion and dose distortion during radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Intra-fractional prostate translational and rotational (6DoF) motion can cause dose distortions. As intra-fractional motion monitoring is often unavailable, this study compares three methods to use pre- and post-treatment cone beam CTs (CBCT) to estimate prostate positioning errors during treatment and their dosimetric impact.

Material and Methods

Eighteen patients received prostate radiotherapy with pre-treatment CBCT setup. For 7–10 fractions per patient (total:174), triggered kV-images were acquired every 3 s during beam-on and a CBCT was acquired post-treatment. The 6DoF prostate position error during treatment was determined from the kV-images (ground truth) and estimated from the CBCTs assuming a static position as in the pre-CBCT(Scenario1), a linear drift between pre- and post-CBCT position(Scenario2) or a static position as in the post-CBCT(Scenario3). The positioning errors and prostate dose from each scenario were compared with the ground truth.

Results

Scenario1 was inferior to the others with prostate position root-mean-square errors of 1.1 mm(LR), 1.7 mm(AP) and 1.8 mm(CC). Scenario2 and 3 were similarly accurate with root-mean-square errors of 0.5 mm(LR), 0.9 mm(AP) and 0.8 mm(CC) (Scenario2) and 0.6 mm(LR), 1.1 mm(AP) and 0.9 mm(CC) (Scenario3). The prostate position errors reduced the CTV D99.5% by more than 2/3 % at 24/15 % of the fractions, respectively. The sensitivity in detecting these dose deficits was low for Scenario1 (9–16 %) and considerably higher for Scenario2 (68–76 %) and Scenario3 (86–91 %). All scenarios showed high specificity (93–99 %).

Conclusion

Using the post-CBCT prostate position, acquired right after treatment, performed best in detecting intra-fractional prostate position errors and CTV dose deficits. It offers a scalable and conservative estimate of motion-induced dose distortions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信