绿色公共采购作为政策信号:不顾地方保护主义,吸引绿色投资者

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Dongyang Zhang , Tingwei Fang , Yurun He
{"title":"绿色公共采购作为政策信号:不顾地方保护主义,吸引绿色投资者","authors":"Dongyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Tingwei Fang ,&nbsp;Yurun He","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Governments increasingly utilize green public procurement (GPP) to steer markets toward sustainability, yet its indicative role in attracting green investors and the distorting effects of local protectionism remain underexplored. Using procurement contract and listed company data, this paper examines GPP’s effect on green investors and its underlying mechanisms, while investigating the distorting effect exercised by local protectionism on policy signals. Our findings reveal that GPP significantly enhances corporate appeal to green investors by improving information transparency, strengthening market competitiveness, and curbing greenwashing. Heterogeneity analyses show that firms’ conditions and the external institutional environment influence the effect of procurement policies. However, local protectionism undermines GPP’s credibility, as politically connected companies can distort procurement results and increase investor skepticism. These findings provide theoretical support and practical insights for optimizing green fiscal policy systems and mitigating local administrative intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 107824"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green public procurement as a policy signal: Attracting green investors despite local protectionism\",\"authors\":\"Dongyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Tingwei Fang ,&nbsp;Yurun He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Governments increasingly utilize green public procurement (GPP) to steer markets toward sustainability, yet its indicative role in attracting green investors and the distorting effects of local protectionism remain underexplored. Using procurement contract and listed company data, this paper examines GPP’s effect on green investors and its underlying mechanisms, while investigating the distorting effect exercised by local protectionism on policy signals. Our findings reveal that GPP significantly enhances corporate appeal to green investors by improving information transparency, strengthening market competitiveness, and curbing greenwashing. Heterogeneity analyses show that firms’ conditions and the external institutional environment influence the effect of procurement policies. However, local protectionism undermines GPP’s credibility, as politically connected companies can distort procurement results and increase investor skepticism. These findings provide theoretical support and practical insights for optimizing green fiscal policy systems and mitigating local administrative intervention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325010827\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325010827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府越来越多地利用绿色公共采购(GPP)来引导市场走向可持续性,但其在吸引绿色投资者和地方保护主义扭曲效应方面的指示性作用仍未得到充分探索。本文利用采购合同和上市公司数据,考察了GPP对绿色投资者的影响及其潜在机制,同时考察了地方保护主义对政策信号的扭曲效应。研究发现,GPP通过提高信息透明度、增强市场竞争力和抑制“漂绿”现象,显著提高了企业对绿色投资者的吸引力。异质性分析表明,企业条件和外部制度环境影响采购政策的效果。然而,地方保护主义削弱了GPP的可信度,因为有政治关系的公司可能会扭曲采购结果,增加投资者的怀疑。研究结果为优化绿色财政政策体系、减少地方行政干预提供了理论支持和实践启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green public procurement as a policy signal: Attracting green investors despite local protectionism
Governments increasingly utilize green public procurement (GPP) to steer markets toward sustainability, yet its indicative role in attracting green investors and the distorting effects of local protectionism remain underexplored. Using procurement contract and listed company data, this paper examines GPP’s effect on green investors and its underlying mechanisms, while investigating the distorting effect exercised by local protectionism on policy signals. Our findings reveal that GPP significantly enhances corporate appeal to green investors by improving information transparency, strengthening market competitiveness, and curbing greenwashing. Heterogeneity analyses show that firms’ conditions and the external institutional environment influence the effect of procurement policies. However, local protectionism undermines GPP’s credibility, as politically connected companies can distort procurement results and increase investor skepticism. These findings provide theoretical support and practical insights for optimizing green fiscal policy systems and mitigating local administrative intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信