胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂与慢性肾病患者急诊科就诊和住院的风险

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI:10.2337/dc24-2811
Kevin Yau, Joel G. Ray, Nivethika Jeyakumar, Bin Luo, Sheikh Abdullah, Eric McArthur, Stephanie N. Dixon, Sara Wing, Kristin K. Clemens, Fabio Castrillon-Ramirez, Jacob A. Udell, Alejandro Meraz-Munoz, Ann Young, Ziv Harel, Jeffrey Perl, Vikas S. Sridhar, Huajing Ni, Tae Won Yi, Lawrence A. Leiter, Amit X. Garg, David Z.I. Cherney, Ron Wald
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂与慢性肾病患者急诊科就诊和住院的风险","authors":"Kevin Yau, Joel G. Ray, Nivethika Jeyakumar, Bin Luo, Sheikh Abdullah, Eric McArthur, Stephanie N. Dixon, Sara Wing, Kristin K. Clemens, Fabio Castrillon-Ramirez, Jacob A. Udell, Alejandro Meraz-Munoz, Ann Young, Ziv Harel, Jeffrey Perl, Vikas S. Sridhar, Huajing Ni, Tae Won Yi, Lawrence A. Leiter, Amit X. Garg, David Z.I. Cherney, Ron Wald","doi":"10.2337/dc24-2811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) initiation on emergency department (ED) visits and all-cause hospitalizations across the spectrum of kidney disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective population-based observational cohort study in adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap time model was used for the primary analysis. RESULTS The cohort included 24,576 new users of a GLP-1RA and 23,600 DPP4i new users. GLP1RA initiation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause ED encounters or hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.87–0.94; P < 0.0001). This finding was consistent in confirmatory analyses using the Andersen-Gill model and the PWP calendar time model. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1RA initiation was associated with a reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations compared with new use of a DPP4i.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Yau, Joel G. Ray, Nivethika Jeyakumar, Bin Luo, Sheikh Abdullah, Eric McArthur, Stephanie N. Dixon, Sara Wing, Kristin K. Clemens, Fabio Castrillon-Ramirez, Jacob A. Udell, Alejandro Meraz-Munoz, Ann Young, Ziv Harel, Jeffrey Perl, Vikas S. Sridhar, Huajing Ni, Tae Won Yi, Lawrence A. Leiter, Amit X. Garg, David Z.I. Cherney, Ron Wald\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc24-2811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) initiation on emergency department (ED) visits and all-cause hospitalizations across the spectrum of kidney disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective population-based observational cohort study in adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap time model was used for the primary analysis. RESULTS The cohort included 24,576 new users of a GLP-1RA and 23,600 DPP4i new users. GLP1RA initiation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause ED encounters or hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.87–0.94; P < 0.0001). This finding was consistent in confirmatory analyses using the Andersen-Gill model and the PWP calendar time model. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1RA initiation was associated with a reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations compared with new use of a DPP4i.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-2811\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-2811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)与二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i)启动对急诊科(ED)就诊和全因肾病住院的影响。研究设计和方法:这是一项基于人群的回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象为肾小球滤过率为90 mL/min/1.73 m2的成人,采用治疗加权逆概率法。采用Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP)间隙时间模型进行初步分析。该队列包括24,576名GLP-1RA新用户和23,600名DPP4i新用户。GLP1RA起始与全因ED遭遇或住院的风险较低相关(风险比[HR] 0.90;95% ci 0.87-0.94;P, lt;0.0001)。这一发现在使用Andersen-Gill模型和PWP日历时间模型的验证分析中是一致的。结论:与新使用DPP4i相比,GLP-1RA启动与全因ED就诊和住院次数减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) initiation on emergency department (ED) visits and all-cause hospitalizations across the spectrum of kidney disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective population-based observational cohort study in adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap time model was used for the primary analysis. RESULTS The cohort included 24,576 new users of a GLP-1RA and 23,600 DPP4i new users. GLP1RA initiation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause ED encounters or hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.87–0.94; P < 0.0001). This finding was consistent in confirmatory analyses using the Andersen-Gill model and the PWP calendar time model. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1RA initiation was associated with a reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations compared with new use of a DPP4i.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信