卢旺达基加利转诊医院剖宫产术后疼痛管理质量:一项横断面研究

Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.22
Emmanuel Habimana Sibomana, Eugene Tuyishime, Francoise Nizeyimana, Christian Mukwesi, Jean de Dieu Tuyishime, Bould M Dylan, Theogene Twagirumugabe
{"title":"卢旺达基加利转诊医院剖宫产术后疼痛管理质量:一项横断面研究","authors":"Emmanuel Habimana Sibomana, Eugene Tuyishime, Francoise Nizeyimana, Christian Mukwesi, Jean de Dieu Tuyishime, Bould M Dylan, Theogene Twagirumugabe","doi":"10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies in high-income settings have demonstrated that pain management after Cesarean section leads to higher patients' satisfaction. However, little is known about the quality of pain management and patients' satisfaction among parturients undergoing cesarean in low resources settings.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted for 385 parturients from May 2020 to October 2020 at a referral hospital in Kigali Rwanda. The sample size was calculated: S = Z<sup>2</sup> × P × (1-P)/M<sup>2</sup>. S = (1.96)2 × 0.5 × (1-0.5)/(0.05)2 = 384.16≈385. Parturients aged over 18 years who underwent cesarean were enrolled prior to surgery and followed up within the first 24 hours post cesarean. Data on patients' characteristics, type of analgesia, type of anesthesia, pain scores, and patients' satisfaction were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age group 26-33 years 199(51.7%) underwent cesarean section and 201(52, 2%) were elective cesarean section; 361 (93.8%) received spinal anesthesia. Most patients had pain control with low pain scores throughout the first 24 hours 90.1% except immediately after recovery admission 46.8% and 76.1% were satisfied. Morphine was associated with higher patients' satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of post cesarean section pain management within 24 hours at hospital is good leading to satisfaction among most patients. However, the quality of pain management was lower after leaving the theatre compared to other post-operative periods; this requires intrathecal morphine which was not used.</p>","PeriodicalId":520910,"journal":{"name":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","volume":"7 2","pages":"372-378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Post-Cesarean Section Pain Management at Referral Hospital in Kigali Rwanda: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Habimana Sibomana, Eugene Tuyishime, Francoise Nizeyimana, Christian Mukwesi, Jean de Dieu Tuyishime, Bould M Dylan, Theogene Twagirumugabe\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies in high-income settings have demonstrated that pain management after Cesarean section leads to higher patients' satisfaction. However, little is known about the quality of pain management and patients' satisfaction among parturients undergoing cesarean in low resources settings.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted for 385 parturients from May 2020 to October 2020 at a referral hospital in Kigali Rwanda. The sample size was calculated: S = Z<sup>2</sup> × P × (1-P)/M<sup>2</sup>. S = (1.96)2 × 0.5 × (1-0.5)/(0.05)2 = 384.16≈385. Parturients aged over 18 years who underwent cesarean were enrolled prior to surgery and followed up within the first 24 hours post cesarean. Data on patients' characteristics, type of analgesia, type of anesthesia, pain scores, and patients' satisfaction were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age group 26-33 years 199(51.7%) underwent cesarean section and 201(52, 2%) were elective cesarean section; 361 (93.8%) received spinal anesthesia. Most patients had pain control with low pain scores throughout the first 24 hours 90.1% except immediately after recovery admission 46.8% and 76.1% were satisfied. Morphine was associated with higher patients' satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of post cesarean section pain management within 24 hours at hospital is good leading to satisfaction among most patients. However, the quality of pain management was lower after leaving the theatre compared to other post-operative periods; this requires intrathecal morphine which was not used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"372-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高收入地区的研究表明,剖宫产术后疼痛管理可提高患者满意度。然而,对于低资源环境下剖宫产患者的疼痛管理质量和患者满意度了解甚少。方法:2020年5月至2020年10月,在卢旺达基加利的一家转诊医院对385名产妇进行了横断面研究。计算样本量:S = Z2 × P × (1-P)/M2。S =(1.96) 2×0.5×(1 - 0.5)/(0.05)2 = 384.16≈385。年龄在18岁以上的剖宫产患者在手术前进行登记,并在剖宫产后24小时内进行随访。收集并分析患者特征、镇痛类型、麻醉类型、疼痛评分、患者满意度等数据。结果:26 ~ 33岁行剖宫产199例(51.7%),择期剖宫产201例(52.2%);361例(93.8%)接受脊髓麻醉。大多数患者疼痛控制良好,除康复后立即入院外,90.1%的患者疼痛评分较低,分别为46.8%和76.1%。吗啡与较高的患者满意度相关。结论:剖宫产术后住院24小时疼痛处理质量较好,多数患者满意。然而,与其他术后时期相比,离开手术室后疼痛管理的质量较低;这需要鞘内注射吗啡,但没有使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Post-Cesarean Section Pain Management at Referral Hospital in Kigali Rwanda: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Studies in high-income settings have demonstrated that pain management after Cesarean section leads to higher patients' satisfaction. However, little is known about the quality of pain management and patients' satisfaction among parturients undergoing cesarean in low resources settings.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted for 385 parturients from May 2020 to October 2020 at a referral hospital in Kigali Rwanda. The sample size was calculated: S = Z2 × P × (1-P)/M2. S = (1.96)2 × 0.5 × (1-0.5)/(0.05)2 = 384.16≈385. Parturients aged over 18 years who underwent cesarean were enrolled prior to surgery and followed up within the first 24 hours post cesarean. Data on patients' characteristics, type of analgesia, type of anesthesia, pain scores, and patients' satisfaction were collected and analyzed.

Results: Age group 26-33 years 199(51.7%) underwent cesarean section and 201(52, 2%) were elective cesarean section; 361 (93.8%) received spinal anesthesia. Most patients had pain control with low pain scores throughout the first 24 hours 90.1% except immediately after recovery admission 46.8% and 76.1% were satisfied. Morphine was associated with higher patients' satisfaction.

Conclusion: The quality of post cesarean section pain management within 24 hours at hospital is good leading to satisfaction among most patients. However, the quality of pain management was lower after leaving the theatre compared to other post-operative periods; this requires intrathecal morphine which was not used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信