肌筋膜释放和软组织动员与运动干预治疗对颈部肌肉骨骼相关综合征的影响:前后研究。

Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-30 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.4314/rjmhs.v7i3.2
Christian Chance Ndahiriwe, Emmy Bucyana, Malachie Tuyizere, Moussa Hakizimana, Jacques Nshimiyimana, Nuhu Assuman, Juliette Gasana, Jean de Dieu Rukundo, Jean Marie Vianney Semana, Ayyappan Jayavel
{"title":"肌筋膜释放和软组织动员与运动干预治疗对颈部肌肉骨骼相关综合征的影响:前后研究。","authors":"Christian Chance Ndahiriwe, Emmy Bucyana, Malachie Tuyizere, Moussa Hakizimana, Jacques Nshimiyimana, Nuhu Assuman, Juliette Gasana, Jean de Dieu Rukundo, Jean Marie Vianney Semana, Ayyappan Jayavel","doi":"10.4314/rjmhs.v7i3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neck-related musculoskeletal disorders are classified among the top disabling conditions leading to discomfort, pain and functional restrictions which impact people's functions and performance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effects of soft tissue mobilization versus interferential therapy with exercises among adults with neck musculoskeletal syndromes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two (32) participants in this study were randomly allocated to two groups. Experimental (n=16) received myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization. Control (n=16) received interferential therapy with conventional neck exercises for 6 weeks. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to measure the effect of the treatment interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings from this intervention study showed a significant improvement in pain and disability. Unpaired (independent) t-test on NPRS and NDI scores between groups (NPRS t-test: -3.693 p=0.001) and (NDI t-test: -8.472, p=0.001) thus, favoring Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization compared to IFT and exercises.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilisation treatment provided greater benefits in terms of reduction of functional limitations and pain. IFT and exercise therapy showed improvement suggesting that a combination of both treatment approaches may yield better results than single treatment modality alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":520910,"journal":{"name":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","volume":"7 3","pages":"403-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Myofascial Release and Soft Tissue Mobilization versus Interferential Therapy with Exercises on Neck Musculoskeletal Related Syndromes: A Before and After Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Chance Ndahiriwe, Emmy Bucyana, Malachie Tuyizere, Moussa Hakizimana, Jacques Nshimiyimana, Nuhu Assuman, Juliette Gasana, Jean de Dieu Rukundo, Jean Marie Vianney Semana, Ayyappan Jayavel\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/rjmhs.v7i3.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neck-related musculoskeletal disorders are classified among the top disabling conditions leading to discomfort, pain and functional restrictions which impact people's functions and performance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effects of soft tissue mobilization versus interferential therapy with exercises among adults with neck musculoskeletal syndromes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two (32) participants in this study were randomly allocated to two groups. Experimental (n=16) received myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization. Control (n=16) received interferential therapy with conventional neck exercises for 6 weeks. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to measure the effect of the treatment interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings from this intervention study showed a significant improvement in pain and disability. Unpaired (independent) t-test on NPRS and NDI scores between groups (NPRS t-test: -3.693 p=0.001) and (NDI t-test: -8.472, p=0.001) thus, favoring Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization compared to IFT and exercises.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilisation treatment provided greater benefits in terms of reduction of functional limitations and pain. IFT and exercise therapy showed improvement suggesting that a combination of both treatment approaches may yield better results than single treatment modality alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"403-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110477/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v7i3.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v7i3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈部相关肌肉骨骼疾病被列为最严重的致残疾病之一,导致不适、疼痛和功能限制,影响人们的功能和表现。目的:评估软组织活动与运动干预治疗对成人颈部肌肉骨骼综合征的影响。材料与方法:本研究32(32)名受试者随机分为两组。实验组(n=16)接受肌筋膜松解和软组织活动。对照组(n=16)接受常规颈部运动干预治疗,为期6周。采用数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)评分和颈部残疾指数(NDI)来衡量治疗干预措施的效果。结果:这项干预研究的结果显示疼痛和残疾有显著改善。各组间NPRS和NDI评分的非配对(独立)t检验(NPRS t检验:-3.693 p=0.001)和(NDI t检验:-8.472,p=0.001)因此,与IFT和锻炼相比,肌筋膜释放和软组织活动更有利。结论:肌筋膜松解和软组织活动治疗在减轻功能限制和疼痛方面有更大的好处。IFT和运动疗法显示出改善,这表明两种治疗方法的结合可能比单独治疗方式产生更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Myofascial Release and Soft Tissue Mobilization versus Interferential Therapy with Exercises on Neck Musculoskeletal Related Syndromes: A Before and After Study.

Background: Neck-related musculoskeletal disorders are classified among the top disabling conditions leading to discomfort, pain and functional restrictions which impact people's functions and performance.

Aim: To assess the effects of soft tissue mobilization versus interferential therapy with exercises among adults with neck musculoskeletal syndromes.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two (32) participants in this study were randomly allocated to two groups. Experimental (n=16) received myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization. Control (n=16) received interferential therapy with conventional neck exercises for 6 weeks. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to measure the effect of the treatment interventions.

Results: The findings from this intervention study showed a significant improvement in pain and disability. Unpaired (independent) t-test on NPRS and NDI scores between groups (NPRS t-test: -3.693 p=0.001) and (NDI t-test: -8.472, p=0.001) thus, favoring Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization compared to IFT and exercises.

Conclusion: Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilisation treatment provided greater benefits in terms of reduction of functional limitations and pain. IFT and exercise therapy showed improvement suggesting that a combination of both treatment approaches may yield better results than single treatment modality alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信