在医院工作的妇产科医生工作时间长及相关因素:一项基于全国调查的比较研究。

Environmental and occupational health practice Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1539/eohp.2024-0018
Masatoshi Ishikawa, Ryoma Seto, Michiko Oguro, Yoshino Sato
{"title":"在医院工作的妇产科医生工作时间长及相关因素:一项基于全国调查的比较研究。","authors":"Masatoshi Ishikawa, Ryoma Seto, Michiko Oguro, Yoshino Sato","doi":"10.1539/eohp.2024-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To elucidate the status of reduction in working hours following physician work-style reforms and factors associated with long working hours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted among obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) working in hospitals. The survey elucidated actual working conditions, including working hours and number of out-of-hour (OOH) shifts. To identify factors associated with long working hours, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, with ≥60 or ≥80 working hours per week as dependent variables and OB/GYNs attributes (sex, age, job position, hospital type by ownership, total number of hospital beds, and regional characteristics) as independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were sent to 1,170 hospitals. Valid responses were obtained from 1164 OB/GYNs at 423 hospitals (response rate: 36%): 26.0% worked ≥60 hours per week, a reduction from 58.1% in 2019 (equivalent to over 960 hours of overtime annually), 5.4% worked ≥80 hours per week, a reduction from 41.2% in 2019 (equivalent to over 1,920 hours of overtime annually); and 46.9% worked OOH shifts ≥5 times per month. Factors significantly associated with long working hours per week included male sex, resident position, teaching duty, and number of OOH shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the working hours of OB/GYNs have decreased because of physician work-style reforms initiated in 2019, long working hours persist. To ensure health of OB/GYNs and patient safety, it is necessary to actively promote physician work-style reforms and advance measures aimed at the centralization of medical resources and addressing their maldistribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":520443,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and occupational health practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long working hours among hospital-employed obstetricians and gynecologists and associated factors: a comparative study based on a nationwide survey.\",\"authors\":\"Masatoshi Ishikawa, Ryoma Seto, Michiko Oguro, Yoshino Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.1539/eohp.2024-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To elucidate the status of reduction in working hours following physician work-style reforms and factors associated with long working hours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted among obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) working in hospitals. The survey elucidated actual working conditions, including working hours and number of out-of-hour (OOH) shifts. To identify factors associated with long working hours, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, with ≥60 or ≥80 working hours per week as dependent variables and OB/GYNs attributes (sex, age, job position, hospital type by ownership, total number of hospital beds, and regional characteristics) as independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were sent to 1,170 hospitals. Valid responses were obtained from 1164 OB/GYNs at 423 hospitals (response rate: 36%): 26.0% worked ≥60 hours per week, a reduction from 58.1% in 2019 (equivalent to over 960 hours of overtime annually), 5.4% worked ≥80 hours per week, a reduction from 41.2% in 2019 (equivalent to over 1,920 hours of overtime annually); and 46.9% worked OOH shifts ≥5 times per month. Factors significantly associated with long working hours per week included male sex, resident position, teaching duty, and number of OOH shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the working hours of OB/GYNs have decreased because of physician work-style reforms initiated in 2019, long working hours persist. To ensure health of OB/GYNs and patient safety, it is necessary to actively promote physician work-style reforms and advance measures aimed at the centralization of medical resources and addressing their maldistribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and occupational health practice\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and occupational health practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2024-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and occupational health practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2024-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解医师工作方式改革后工作时间减少的现状及与长工作时间相关的因素。方法:对全国各医院妇产科医师进行问卷调查。调查阐明了实际的工作条件,包括工作时间和下班班次。为了确定与长工作时间相关的因素,进行了多变量logistic回归分析,将每周≥60或≥80工作时间作为因变量,将妇产科医生的属性(性别、年龄、工作岗位、医院所属类型、医院床位总数和地区特征)作为自变量。结果:共向1170家医院发放问卷。从423家医院的1164名妇产科医生中获得有效回复(回复率:36%):26.0%每周工作时间≥60小时,低于2019年的58.1%(相当于每年加班超过960小时),5.4%每周工作时间≥80小时,低于2019年的41.2%(相当于每年加班超过1920小时);46.9%的人每月在户外工作≥5次。与每周长工作时间显著相关的因素包括男性性别、住院医师职位、教学职责和户外班数。结论:尽管2019年医师工作方式改革使妇产科医生的工作时间有所减少,但长时间工作仍然存在。为保障妇产科医生的健康和患者的安全,有必要积极推进医师工作作风改革,推进医疗资源集中和分配不均的治理措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long working hours among hospital-employed obstetricians and gynecologists and associated factors: a comparative study based on a nationwide survey.

Objectives: To elucidate the status of reduction in working hours following physician work-style reforms and factors associated with long working hours.

Methods: A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted among obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) working in hospitals. The survey elucidated actual working conditions, including working hours and number of out-of-hour (OOH) shifts. To identify factors associated with long working hours, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, with ≥60 or ≥80 working hours per week as dependent variables and OB/GYNs attributes (sex, age, job position, hospital type by ownership, total number of hospital beds, and regional characteristics) as independent variables.

Results: Questionnaires were sent to 1,170 hospitals. Valid responses were obtained from 1164 OB/GYNs at 423 hospitals (response rate: 36%): 26.0% worked ≥60 hours per week, a reduction from 58.1% in 2019 (equivalent to over 960 hours of overtime annually), 5.4% worked ≥80 hours per week, a reduction from 41.2% in 2019 (equivalent to over 1,920 hours of overtime annually); and 46.9% worked OOH shifts ≥5 times per month. Factors significantly associated with long working hours per week included male sex, resident position, teaching duty, and number of OOH shifts.

Conclusions: Although the working hours of OB/GYNs have decreased because of physician work-style reforms initiated in 2019, long working hours persist. To ensure health of OB/GYNs and patient safety, it is necessary to actively promote physician work-style reforms and advance measures aimed at the centralization of medical resources and addressing their maldistribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信