Rohan Bhimani, Andrew M Hresko, Kevin Y Wang, John Y Kwon
{"title":"改良跗窦入路增加跟外侧体和距下关节的显像。","authors":"Rohan Bhimani, Andrew M Hresko, Kevin Y Wang, John Y Kwon","doi":"10.1177/10711007251343530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional sinus tarsi approach (TST) for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneus fractures has gained popularity because of adequate fracture exposure with lower wound complication rates. Visualization, as compared with more extensile approaches, can be limited, however. This study introduces a modified sinus tarsi approach (MST) that extends the TST incision approximately 2 cm posterodorsally as well as 2 cm anteroplantarly, to enhance exposure. The aim of this study is to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with the traditional sinus tarsi approach and the modified sinus tarsi approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve unpaired fresh frozen cadaveric specimens underwent sequential dissection starting with the TST followed by the MST. Standardized tension was applied to the incisions during both surgical exposures. Exposed surface areas, including the lateral calcaneal wall, posterior facet, and dorsal surface were marked. Digital images of the exposed calcaneal surfaces were analyzed using digital imaging software. The distance of the sural nerve from the incision was recorded for the MST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MST provided significantly greater exposure of the lateral calcaneal wall, posterior facet and dorsal surface compared to the TST (865 ± 77.8 mm², 39% of total lateral wall area, vs 322 ± 71.9 mm², 14.9% of total lateral wall area; 204 ± 69.8 mm², 43.3% of posterior facet area, vs 66.9 ± 27.9 mm², 13.7% of posterior facet area; and 549 ± 124 mm², 45.1% of dorsal surface area, vs 199 ± 61.8 mm², 16.3% of dorsal surface area, all <i>P</i> < .0001). The sural nerve was found an average of 1.8 ± 6.1 mm dorsal to the plantar extent of the MST incision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In noninjured cadaver specimens, the modified sinus tarsi approach, which extends the incision by 4 cm, was found to substantially increase visualization of calcaneal surfaces compared with the traditional sinus tarsi approach. Care must be taken with the sural nerve, which is often in or near the MST distal extension. This enhanced exposure may allow for improved fracture reduction and fixation while retaining the soft tissue and angiosomal benefits of the traditional sinus tarsi approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"765-773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased Lateral Calcaneal Body and Subtalar Joint Visualization Utilizing a Modified Sinus Tarsi Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Rohan Bhimani, Andrew M Hresko, Kevin Y Wang, John Y Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251343530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional sinus tarsi approach (TST) for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneus fractures has gained popularity because of adequate fracture exposure with lower wound complication rates. Visualization, as compared with more extensile approaches, can be limited, however. This study introduces a modified sinus tarsi approach (MST) that extends the TST incision approximately 2 cm posterodorsally as well as 2 cm anteroplantarly, to enhance exposure. The aim of this study is to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with the traditional sinus tarsi approach and the modified sinus tarsi approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve unpaired fresh frozen cadaveric specimens underwent sequential dissection starting with the TST followed by the MST. Standardized tension was applied to the incisions during both surgical exposures. Exposed surface areas, including the lateral calcaneal wall, posterior facet, and dorsal surface were marked. Digital images of the exposed calcaneal surfaces were analyzed using digital imaging software. The distance of the sural nerve from the incision was recorded for the MST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MST provided significantly greater exposure of the lateral calcaneal wall, posterior facet and dorsal surface compared to the TST (865 ± 77.8 mm², 39% of total lateral wall area, vs 322 ± 71.9 mm², 14.9% of total lateral wall area; 204 ± 69.8 mm², 43.3% of posterior facet area, vs 66.9 ± 27.9 mm², 13.7% of posterior facet area; and 549 ± 124 mm², 45.1% of dorsal surface area, vs 199 ± 61.8 mm², 16.3% of dorsal surface area, all <i>P</i> < .0001). The sural nerve was found an average of 1.8 ± 6.1 mm dorsal to the plantar extent of the MST incision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In noninjured cadaver specimens, the modified sinus tarsi approach, which extends the incision by 4 cm, was found to substantially increase visualization of calcaneal surfaces compared with the traditional sinus tarsi approach. Care must be taken with the sural nerve, which is often in or near the MST distal extension. This enhanced exposure may allow for improved fracture reduction and fixation while retaining the soft tissue and angiosomal benefits of the traditional sinus tarsi approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"765-773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251343530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251343530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:传统的跗骨窦入路(TST)用于跟骨骨折的切开复位内固定(ORIF),因为骨折暴露足够且伤口并发症发生率较低而越来越受欢迎。然而,与更具可扩展性的方法相比,可视化可能是有限的。本研究介绍了一种改良的跗骨窦入路(MST),该入路将TST切口在鼻后和跖前分别延伸约2厘米,以增强暴露。本研究的目的是量化传统鼻窦入路和改良鼻窦入路所获得的暴露量。方法:对12例未配对的新鲜冷冻尸体标本进行了从TST开始的顺序解剖,然后是MST。在两次手术暴露期间,对切口施加标准化张力。暴露的表面区域,包括跟外侧壁、后关节面和背表面被标记。用数字成像软件对暴露的跟骨表面的数字图像进行分析。记录腓肠神经与切口的距离,用于MST。结果:与TST相比,MST提供了更大的跟外侧壁、后关节突和背表面的暴露(865±77.8 mm²,占总外壁面积的39%,比322±71.9 mm²,占总外壁面积的14.9%);204±69.8 mm²,后突面积43.3% vs 66.9±27.9 mm²,后突面积13.7%;和(549±124)mm²,45.1%的背表面积vs(199±61.8)mm²,16.3%的背表面积,均P结论:在未受伤的尸体标本中,改良的跗骨窦入路切口延长了4 cm,与传统的跗骨窦入路相比,显著增加了跟骨表面的可见性。腓肠神经通常位于或靠近MST远端延伸处,必须小心。这种增强的暴露可以改善骨折复位和固定,同时保留传统鼻窦入路对软组织和血管体的益处。
Increased Lateral Calcaneal Body and Subtalar Joint Visualization Utilizing a Modified Sinus Tarsi Approach.
Background: The traditional sinus tarsi approach (TST) for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneus fractures has gained popularity because of adequate fracture exposure with lower wound complication rates. Visualization, as compared with more extensile approaches, can be limited, however. This study introduces a modified sinus tarsi approach (MST) that extends the TST incision approximately 2 cm posterodorsally as well as 2 cm anteroplantarly, to enhance exposure. The aim of this study is to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with the traditional sinus tarsi approach and the modified sinus tarsi approach.
Methods: Twelve unpaired fresh frozen cadaveric specimens underwent sequential dissection starting with the TST followed by the MST. Standardized tension was applied to the incisions during both surgical exposures. Exposed surface areas, including the lateral calcaneal wall, posterior facet, and dorsal surface were marked. Digital images of the exposed calcaneal surfaces were analyzed using digital imaging software. The distance of the sural nerve from the incision was recorded for the MST.
Results: The MST provided significantly greater exposure of the lateral calcaneal wall, posterior facet and dorsal surface compared to the TST (865 ± 77.8 mm², 39% of total lateral wall area, vs 322 ± 71.9 mm², 14.9% of total lateral wall area; 204 ± 69.8 mm², 43.3% of posterior facet area, vs 66.9 ± 27.9 mm², 13.7% of posterior facet area; and 549 ± 124 mm², 45.1% of dorsal surface area, vs 199 ± 61.8 mm², 16.3% of dorsal surface area, all P < .0001). The sural nerve was found an average of 1.8 ± 6.1 mm dorsal to the plantar extent of the MST incision.
Conclusion: In noninjured cadaver specimens, the modified sinus tarsi approach, which extends the incision by 4 cm, was found to substantially increase visualization of calcaneal surfaces compared with the traditional sinus tarsi approach. Care must be taken with the sural nerve, which is often in or near the MST distal extension. This enhanced exposure may allow for improved fracture reduction and fixation while retaining the soft tissue and angiosomal benefits of the traditional sinus tarsi approach.