2023-2024年澳大利亚社区使用药用大麻治疗癫痫:一项横断面调查

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.25006
Douglas A D Skene, Iain S McGregor, Lisa Todd, Anastasia Suraev
{"title":"2023-2024年澳大利亚社区使用药用大麻治疗癫痫:一项横断面调查","authors":"Douglas A D Skene, Iain S McGregor, Lisa Todd, Anastasia Suraev","doi":"10.14581/jer.25006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Epilepsy is a common indication for medicinal cannabis (MC) prescription in Australia. Despite legal MC products being available for 8 years, some individuals continue to rely on illicit cannabis. Here, we conducted a survey of Australian persons/people with epilepsy (PWE) and caregivers of a PWE to assess whether the current legal framework supports PWE and/or their caregivers to access prescribed MC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional survey consisted of five sections examining sociodemographics, medical history, history of MC use, attitudes towards MC, and barriers to accessing MC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 respondents included in these analyses, 102 were PWE (mean age, 40.9±12.3 years) and 24 were caregivers of a PWE (mean age of PWE, 14.1±8.9 years). Among PWE, 27.5% (28/102) had only used illicit MC products, 27.5% (28/102) had transitioned to prescribed MC products, and 16.7% (17/102) used both. Most caregivers 70.8% (17/24) had only accessed prescribed MC products. Most respondents 77.0% (97/126) reported using MC as an adjunct to conventional anti-seizure medications. Caregivers were more likely to administer prescribed high-cannabidiol products to children using oral routes of administration (<i>p</i><0.001). In contrast, PWE often used inhaled cannabis (<i>p</i><0.001). Overall, 67.0% (83/124) of respondents reported that MC \"improved\" or \"greatly improved\" their epilepsy, irrespective of MC type. The main barrier to accessing prescribed MC was \"cost\" (69.0%, 87/126), while tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-related driving restrictions were also a significant concern for PWE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current regulatory framework in Australia supports MC access for PWE and their caregivers, primarily through cannabis clinics. However, cost remains a significant concern. The prevalent use of Δ9-THC-containing and inhaled MC products, either illicit or prescribed, highlights the urgent need to further investigate their safety and efficacy in epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":"15 1","pages":"56-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Medicinal Cannabis for Epilepsy in the Australian Community 2023-2024: A Cross-Sectional Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas A D Skene, Iain S McGregor, Lisa Todd, Anastasia Suraev\",\"doi\":\"10.14581/jer.25006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Epilepsy is a common indication for medicinal cannabis (MC) prescription in Australia. Despite legal MC products being available for 8 years, some individuals continue to rely on illicit cannabis. Here, we conducted a survey of Australian persons/people with epilepsy (PWE) and caregivers of a PWE to assess whether the current legal framework supports PWE and/or their caregivers to access prescribed MC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional survey consisted of five sections examining sociodemographics, medical history, history of MC use, attitudes towards MC, and barriers to accessing MC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 respondents included in these analyses, 102 were PWE (mean age, 40.9±12.3 years) and 24 were caregivers of a PWE (mean age of PWE, 14.1±8.9 years). Among PWE, 27.5% (28/102) had only used illicit MC products, 27.5% (28/102) had transitioned to prescribed MC products, and 16.7% (17/102) used both. Most caregivers 70.8% (17/24) had only accessed prescribed MC products. Most respondents 77.0% (97/126) reported using MC as an adjunct to conventional anti-seizure medications. Caregivers were more likely to administer prescribed high-cannabidiol products to children using oral routes of administration (<i>p</i><0.001). In contrast, PWE often used inhaled cannabis (<i>p</i><0.001). Overall, 67.0% (83/124) of respondents reported that MC \\\"improved\\\" or \\\"greatly improved\\\" their epilepsy, irrespective of MC type. The main barrier to accessing prescribed MC was \\\"cost\\\" (69.0%, 87/126), while tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-related driving restrictions were also a significant concern for PWE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current regulatory framework in Australia supports MC access for PWE and their caregivers, primarily through cannabis clinics. However, cost remains a significant concern. The prevalent use of Δ9-THC-containing and inhaled MC products, either illicit or prescribed, highlights the urgent need to further investigate their safety and efficacy in epilepsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"56-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185916/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.25006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.25006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:癫痫是澳大利亚医用大麻(MC)处方的常见适应症。尽管合法的大麻产品已经存在了8年,但有些人仍然依赖非法大麻。在这里,我们对澳大利亚癫痫患者(PWE)和PWE的照顾者进行了调查,以评估当前的法律框架是否支持PWE和/或他们的照顾者获得规定的MC。方法:横断面调查包括五个部分,包括社会人口统计学、病史、MC使用史、对MC的态度和获取MC的障碍。在126名被调查者中,102名是PWE(平均年龄40.9±12.3岁),24名是PWE的照顾者(平均年龄14.1±8.9岁)。在PWE中,27.5%(28/102)只使用非法MC产品,27.5%(28/102)过渡到规定的MC产品,16.7%(17/102)两者都使用。大多数护理人员(70.8%)(17/24)仅使用处方MC产品。77.0%(97/126)的受访者报告使用MC作为常规抗癫痫药物的辅助治疗。护理人员更有可能使用口服给药途径给儿童施用高大麻二酚产品(pp结论:澳大利亚目前的监管框架主要通过大麻诊所支持PWE及其护理人员获得MC。然而,成本仍然是一个重大问题。Δ9-THC-containing和吸入性氯胺酮产品的普遍使用,无论是非法的还是处方的,都突出表明迫切需要进一步调查其在癫痫中的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of Medicinal Cannabis for Epilepsy in the Australian Community 2023-2024: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Use of Medicinal Cannabis for Epilepsy in the Australian Community 2023-2024: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Use of Medicinal Cannabis for Epilepsy in the Australian Community 2023-2024: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Use of Medicinal Cannabis for Epilepsy in the Australian Community 2023-2024: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Background and purpose: Epilepsy is a common indication for medicinal cannabis (MC) prescription in Australia. Despite legal MC products being available for 8 years, some individuals continue to rely on illicit cannabis. Here, we conducted a survey of Australian persons/people with epilepsy (PWE) and caregivers of a PWE to assess whether the current legal framework supports PWE and/or their caregivers to access prescribed MC.

Methods: The cross-sectional survey consisted of five sections examining sociodemographics, medical history, history of MC use, attitudes towards MC, and barriers to accessing MC.

Results: Of the 126 respondents included in these analyses, 102 were PWE (mean age, 40.9±12.3 years) and 24 were caregivers of a PWE (mean age of PWE, 14.1±8.9 years). Among PWE, 27.5% (28/102) had only used illicit MC products, 27.5% (28/102) had transitioned to prescribed MC products, and 16.7% (17/102) used both. Most caregivers 70.8% (17/24) had only accessed prescribed MC products. Most respondents 77.0% (97/126) reported using MC as an adjunct to conventional anti-seizure medications. Caregivers were more likely to administer prescribed high-cannabidiol products to children using oral routes of administration (p<0.001). In contrast, PWE often used inhaled cannabis (p<0.001). Overall, 67.0% (83/124) of respondents reported that MC "improved" or "greatly improved" their epilepsy, irrespective of MC type. The main barrier to accessing prescribed MC was "cost" (69.0%, 87/126), while tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-related driving restrictions were also a significant concern for PWE.

Conclusions: The current regulatory framework in Australia supports MC access for PWE and their caregivers, primarily through cannabis clinics. However, cost remains a significant concern. The prevalent use of Δ9-THC-containing and inhaled MC products, either illicit or prescribed, highlights the urgent need to further investigate their safety and efficacy in epilepsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信