人工智能在癫痫中的应用:系统综述。

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.25002
Almuntasar Al-Breiki, Said Al-Sinani, Ahmed Elsharaawy, Mohamed Usama, Tariq Al-Saadi
{"title":"人工智能在癫痫中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Almuntasar Al-Breiki, Said Al-Sinani, Ahmed Elsharaawy, Mohamed Usama, Tariq Al-Saadi","doi":"10.14581/jer.25002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnosing and managing epilepsy is difficult for doctors. Surgery can help some patients, but it often takes a long time to get there. This research looks at scientific studies to see if artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) can be used to improve epilepsy treatment. In-depth research was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Wiley, Web of Science, and Microsoft Academia. This search focused on studies exploring the use of ML for diagnosing epilepsy, predicting treatment response, and predicting outcomes of epilepsy surgery. The search was limited to original English-language articles published between 2015 and 2022. This review examined 36 studies on using ML to predict epilepsy. The studies fell into four categories: general diagnosis (27), treatment outcome (3), identifying surgical candidates (2), and predicting surgical results (4). Researchers employed a diverse set of data, including symptoms and brain scans, alongside machine learning algorithms like support vector machines and convolutional neural networks, to construct their models. Some models achieved impressive results with areas under the curve reaching up to 0.99, but most studies were limited by small sample sizes and a lack of independent validation. ML shows potential for epilepsy treatment based on initial studies, but real-world use is restricted due to small sample sizes and the need for more validation from other studies. Large collaborative research efforts and data on long-term outcomes are essential before ML can be widely adopted by doctors and make a positive difference for epilepsy patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":"15 1","pages":"2-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Epilepsy: A Systemic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Almuntasar Al-Breiki, Said Al-Sinani, Ahmed Elsharaawy, Mohamed Usama, Tariq Al-Saadi\",\"doi\":\"10.14581/jer.25002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diagnosing and managing epilepsy is difficult for doctors. Surgery can help some patients, but it often takes a long time to get there. This research looks at scientific studies to see if artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) can be used to improve epilepsy treatment. In-depth research was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Wiley, Web of Science, and Microsoft Academia. This search focused on studies exploring the use of ML for diagnosing epilepsy, predicting treatment response, and predicting outcomes of epilepsy surgery. The search was limited to original English-language articles published between 2015 and 2022. This review examined 36 studies on using ML to predict epilepsy. The studies fell into four categories: general diagnosis (27), treatment outcome (3), identifying surgical candidates (2), and predicting surgical results (4). Researchers employed a diverse set of data, including symptoms and brain scans, alongside machine learning algorithms like support vector machines and convolutional neural networks, to construct their models. Some models achieved impressive results with areas under the curve reaching up to 0.99, but most studies were limited by small sample sizes and a lack of independent validation. ML shows potential for epilepsy treatment based on initial studies, but real-world use is restricted due to small sample sizes and the need for more validation from other studies. Large collaborative research efforts and data on long-term outcomes are essential before ML can be widely adopted by doctors and make a positive difference for epilepsy patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"2-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.25002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.25002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诊断和治疗癫痫对医生来说很困难。手术可以帮助一些病人,但通常需要很长时间才能达到目的。这项研究着眼于科学研究,看看人工智能和机器学习(ML)是否可以用来改善癫痫治疗。在PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、Scopus、Wiley、Web of Science和Microsoft Academia进行了深入的研究。本研究的重点是探索机器学习在癫痫诊断、预测治疗反应和预测癫痫手术结果中的应用。搜索仅限于2015年至2022年间发表的原创英语文章。本文回顾了36项使用ML预测癫痫的研究。这些研究分为四类:一般诊断(27项)、治疗结果(3项)、确定候选手术(2项)和预测手术结果(4项)。研究人员使用了一系列不同的数据,包括症状和脑部扫描,以及支持向量机和卷积神经网络等机器学习算法来构建他们的模型。一些模型取得了令人印象深刻的结果,曲线下面积达到0.99,但大多数研究受到样本量小和缺乏独立验证的限制。基于初步研究,ML显示了癫痫治疗的潜力,但由于样本量小,需要从其他研究中获得更多验证,因此实际应用受到限制。在ML被医生广泛采用并对癫痫患者产生积极影响之前,大规模的合作研究努力和长期结果数据是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence in Epilepsy: A Systemic Review.

Diagnosing and managing epilepsy is difficult for doctors. Surgery can help some patients, but it often takes a long time to get there. This research looks at scientific studies to see if artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) can be used to improve epilepsy treatment. In-depth research was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Wiley, Web of Science, and Microsoft Academia. This search focused on studies exploring the use of ML for diagnosing epilepsy, predicting treatment response, and predicting outcomes of epilepsy surgery. The search was limited to original English-language articles published between 2015 and 2022. This review examined 36 studies on using ML to predict epilepsy. The studies fell into four categories: general diagnosis (27), treatment outcome (3), identifying surgical candidates (2), and predicting surgical results (4). Researchers employed a diverse set of data, including symptoms and brain scans, alongside machine learning algorithms like support vector machines and convolutional neural networks, to construct their models. Some models achieved impressive results with areas under the curve reaching up to 0.99, but most studies were limited by small sample sizes and a lack of independent validation. ML shows potential for epilepsy treatment based on initial studies, but real-world use is restricted due to small sample sizes and the need for more validation from other studies. Large collaborative research efforts and data on long-term outcomes are essential before ML can be widely adopted by doctors and make a positive difference for epilepsy patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信