建立一个动态模型来评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后大出血的风险。

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000906
Nathan C Hurley, Nihar Desai, Sanket S Dhruva, Rohan Khera, Wade Schulz, Chenxi Huang, Jeptha Curtis, Frederick Masoudi, John Rumsfeld, Sahand Negahban, Harlan M Krumholz, Bobak J Mortazavi
{"title":"建立一个动态模型来评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后大出血的风险。","authors":"Nathan C Hurley, Nihar Desai, Sanket S Dhruva, Rohan Khera, Wade Schulz, Chenxi Huang, Jeptha Curtis, Frederick Masoudi, John Rumsfeld, Sahand Negahban, Harlan M Krumholz, Bobak J Mortazavi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While static risk models may identify key driving risk factors, the dynamic nature of risk requires up-to-date risk information to guide treatment decision making. Bleeding is a complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and existing risk models produce only a single risk estimate anchored at a single point in time, despite the dynamic nature of this risk. Using data available from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI, we trained 6 different tree-based machine learning models to estimate the risk of bleeding at key decision points: 1) choice of access site, 2) prescription of medication before PCI, and 3) choice of closure device. We began with 3,423,170 PCIs performed between July 2009 through April 2015. We included only index PCIs and removed anyone who had missing data regarding bleeding events or underwent coronary artery bypass grafting during the index admission. We included 2,868,808 PCIs; 2,314,446 (80.7%) before 2014 for training and 554,362 (19.3%) remaining for validation. This study considered all data available from the Registry prior to patient discharge: patient characteristics, coronary anatomy and lesion characterization, laboratory data, past medical history, anti-coagulation, stent type, and closure method categories. The primary outcome was any in-hospital bleeding event within 72 hours after the start of the PCI procedure. Discrimination improved from an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.812 using only presentation variables to 0.845 using all variables. Among 123,712 patients classified as low risk by the initial model, 14,441 were reclassified as moderate risk (1.4% experienced bleeds), while 723 were reclassified as high risk (12.5% experienced bleeds). Static risk prediction models have more predictive error than those that update risk prediction with newly available data, which provides up-to-date risk prediction for individualized care throughout a hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 6","pages":"e0000906"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a dynamic model to estimate evolving risk of major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan C Hurley, Nihar Desai, Sanket S Dhruva, Rohan Khera, Wade Schulz, Chenxi Huang, Jeptha Curtis, Frederick Masoudi, John Rumsfeld, Sahand Negahban, Harlan M Krumholz, Bobak J Mortazavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While static risk models may identify key driving risk factors, the dynamic nature of risk requires up-to-date risk information to guide treatment decision making. Bleeding is a complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and existing risk models produce only a single risk estimate anchored at a single point in time, despite the dynamic nature of this risk. Using data available from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI, we trained 6 different tree-based machine learning models to estimate the risk of bleeding at key decision points: 1) choice of access site, 2) prescription of medication before PCI, and 3) choice of closure device. We began with 3,423,170 PCIs performed between July 2009 through April 2015. We included only index PCIs and removed anyone who had missing data regarding bleeding events or underwent coronary artery bypass grafting during the index admission. We included 2,868,808 PCIs; 2,314,446 (80.7%) before 2014 for training and 554,362 (19.3%) remaining for validation. This study considered all data available from the Registry prior to patient discharge: patient characteristics, coronary anatomy and lesion characterization, laboratory data, past medical history, anti-coagulation, stent type, and closure method categories. The primary outcome was any in-hospital bleeding event within 72 hours after the start of the PCI procedure. Discrimination improved from an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.812 using only presentation variables to 0.845 using all variables. Among 123,712 patients classified as low risk by the initial model, 14,441 were reclassified as moderate risk (1.4% experienced bleeds), while 723 were reclassified as high risk (12.5% experienced bleeds). Static risk prediction models have more predictive error than those that update risk prediction with newly available data, which provides up-to-date risk prediction for individualized care throughout a hospitalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"e0000906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然静态风险模型可以识别关键的驱动风险因素,但风险的动态性质需要最新的风险信息来指导治疗决策。出血是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的并发症,尽管这种风险具有动态特性,但现有的风险模型只能在单一时间点上产生单一的风险估计。使用来自国家心血管数据登记处(NCDR) CathPCI的数据,我们训练了6种不同的基于树的机器学习模型来估计关键决策点的出血风险:1)选择通路部位,2)PCI前的药物处方,3)选择闭合装置。从2009年7月到2015年4月,我们进行了3,423,170次pci测试。我们只纳入了指数pci,并剔除了所有在指数入院期间缺少出血事件数据或接受冠状动脉搭桥术的患者。我们纳入了2,868,808个pci;2014年之前的2,314,446(80.7%)用于培训,554,362(19.3%)用于验证。本研究考虑了患者出院前从登记处获得的所有数据:患者特征、冠状动脉解剖和病变特征、实验室数据、既往病史、抗凝、支架类型和闭合方法类别。主要终点是PCI手术开始后72小时内的院内出血事件。从仅使用表现变量时的接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.812提高到使用所有变量时的0.845。在初始模型分类为低风险的123,712例患者中,14,441例被重新分类为中度风险(1.4%发生出血),723例被重新分类为高风险(12.5%发生出血)。静态风险预测模型比那些使用最新可用数据更新风险预测的模型具有更大的预测误差,后者为整个住院期间的个性化护理提供最新的风险预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a dynamic model to estimate evolving risk of major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.

While static risk models may identify key driving risk factors, the dynamic nature of risk requires up-to-date risk information to guide treatment decision making. Bleeding is a complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and existing risk models produce only a single risk estimate anchored at a single point in time, despite the dynamic nature of this risk. Using data available from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI, we trained 6 different tree-based machine learning models to estimate the risk of bleeding at key decision points: 1) choice of access site, 2) prescription of medication before PCI, and 3) choice of closure device. We began with 3,423,170 PCIs performed between July 2009 through April 2015. We included only index PCIs and removed anyone who had missing data regarding bleeding events or underwent coronary artery bypass grafting during the index admission. We included 2,868,808 PCIs; 2,314,446 (80.7%) before 2014 for training and 554,362 (19.3%) remaining for validation. This study considered all data available from the Registry prior to patient discharge: patient characteristics, coronary anatomy and lesion characterization, laboratory data, past medical history, anti-coagulation, stent type, and closure method categories. The primary outcome was any in-hospital bleeding event within 72 hours after the start of the PCI procedure. Discrimination improved from an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.812 using only presentation variables to 0.845 using all variables. Among 123,712 patients classified as low risk by the initial model, 14,441 were reclassified as moderate risk (1.4% experienced bleeds), while 723 were reclassified as high risk (12.5% experienced bleeds). Static risk prediction models have more predictive error than those that update risk prediction with newly available data, which provides up-to-date risk prediction for individualized care throughout a hospitalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信