物联网(IoT)设备识别的机器学习:比较研究。

IF 3.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
PeerJ Computer Science Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2873
Hamid Tahaei, Anqi Liu, Hamid Forooghikian, Mehdi Gheisari, Faiz Zaki, Nor Badrul Anuar, Zhaoxi Fang, Longjun Huang
{"title":"物联网(IoT)设备识别的机器学习:比较研究。","authors":"Hamid Tahaei, Anqi Liu, Hamid Forooghikian, Mehdi Gheisari, Faiz Zaki, Nor Badrul Anuar, Zhaoxi Fang, Longjun Huang","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.2873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid deployment of millions of connected devices brings significant security challenges to the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT devices are typically resource-constrained and designed for specific tasks, from which new security challenges are introduced. As such, IoT device identification has garnered substantial attention and is regarded as an initial layer of cybersecurity. One of the major steps in distinguishing IoT devices involves leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques on device network flows known as device fingerprinting. Numerous studies have proposed various solutions that incorporate ML and feature selection (FS) algorithms with different degrees of accuracy. Yet, the domain needs a comparative analysis of the accuracy of different classifiers and FS algorithms to comprehend their true capabilities in various datasets. This article provides a comprehensive performance evaluation of several reputable classifiers being used in the literature. The study evaluates the efficacy of filter-and wrapper-based FS methods across various ML classifiers. Additionally, we implemented a Binary Green Wolf Optimizer (BGWO) and compared its performance with that of traditional ML classifiers to assess the potential of this binary meta-heuristic algorithm. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we evaluated the effectiveness of each classifier and FS method using two widely utilized datasets. Our experiments demonstrated that BGWO effectively reduced the feature set by 85.11% and 73.33% for datasets 1 and 2, respectively, while achieving classification accuracies of 98.51% and 99.8%, respectively. The findings of this study highlight the strong capabilities of BGWO in reducing both the feature dimensionality and accuracy gained through classification. Furthermore, it demonstrates the effectiveness of wrapper methods in the reduction of feature sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":54224,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning for Internet of Things (IoT) device identification: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Tahaei, Anqi Liu, Hamid Forooghikian, Mehdi Gheisari, Faiz Zaki, Nor Badrul Anuar, Zhaoxi Fang, Longjun Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.7717/peerj-cs.2873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid deployment of millions of connected devices brings significant security challenges to the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT devices are typically resource-constrained and designed for specific tasks, from which new security challenges are introduced. As such, IoT device identification has garnered substantial attention and is regarded as an initial layer of cybersecurity. One of the major steps in distinguishing IoT devices involves leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques on device network flows known as device fingerprinting. Numerous studies have proposed various solutions that incorporate ML and feature selection (FS) algorithms with different degrees of accuracy. Yet, the domain needs a comparative analysis of the accuracy of different classifiers and FS algorithms to comprehend their true capabilities in various datasets. This article provides a comprehensive performance evaluation of several reputable classifiers being used in the literature. The study evaluates the efficacy of filter-and wrapper-based FS methods across various ML classifiers. Additionally, we implemented a Binary Green Wolf Optimizer (BGWO) and compared its performance with that of traditional ML classifiers to assess the potential of this binary meta-heuristic algorithm. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we evaluated the effectiveness of each classifier and FS method using two widely utilized datasets. Our experiments demonstrated that BGWO effectively reduced the feature set by 85.11% and 73.33% for datasets 1 and 2, respectively, while achieving classification accuracies of 98.51% and 99.8%, respectively. The findings of this study highlight the strong capabilities of BGWO in reducing both the feature dimensionality and accuracy gained through classification. Furthermore, it demonstrates the effectiveness of wrapper methods in the reduction of feature sets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2873\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数以百万计的连接设备的快速部署给物联网(IoT)带来了重大的安全挑战。物联网设备通常资源受限,专为特定任务而设计,由此引入了新的安全挑战。因此,物联网设备识别已经引起了极大的关注,并被视为网络安全的初始层。区分物联网设备的主要步骤之一是利用设备网络流上的机器学习(ML)技术,即设备指纹。许多研究已经提出了各种解决方案,这些解决方案结合了ML和具有不同精度的特征选择(FS)算法。然而,该领域需要对不同分类器和FS算法的准确性进行比较分析,以了解它们在各种数据集中的真实能力。本文提供了在文献中使用的几个信誉良好的分类器的综合性能评估。该研究评估了各种ML分类器中基于过滤器和包装器的FS方法的有效性。此外,我们实现了一个二进制绿狼优化器(BGWO),并将其性能与传统的ML分类器进行了比较,以评估该二进制元启发式算法的潜力。为了确保我们发现的稳健性,我们使用两个广泛使用的数据集评估了每个分类器和FS方法的有效性。我们的实验表明,BGWO对数据集1和数据集2的特征集分别减少了85.11%和73.33%,分类准确率分别达到了98.51%和99.8%。本研究的结果突出了BGWO在降低特征维数和通过分类获得的准确性方面的强大能力。进一步证明了包装方法在特征集约简中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning for Internet of Things (IoT) device identification: a comparative study.

The rapid deployment of millions of connected devices brings significant security challenges to the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT devices are typically resource-constrained and designed for specific tasks, from which new security challenges are introduced. As such, IoT device identification has garnered substantial attention and is regarded as an initial layer of cybersecurity. One of the major steps in distinguishing IoT devices involves leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques on device network flows known as device fingerprinting. Numerous studies have proposed various solutions that incorporate ML and feature selection (FS) algorithms with different degrees of accuracy. Yet, the domain needs a comparative analysis of the accuracy of different classifiers and FS algorithms to comprehend their true capabilities in various datasets. This article provides a comprehensive performance evaluation of several reputable classifiers being used in the literature. The study evaluates the efficacy of filter-and wrapper-based FS methods across various ML classifiers. Additionally, we implemented a Binary Green Wolf Optimizer (BGWO) and compared its performance with that of traditional ML classifiers to assess the potential of this binary meta-heuristic algorithm. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we evaluated the effectiveness of each classifier and FS method using two widely utilized datasets. Our experiments demonstrated that BGWO effectively reduced the feature set by 85.11% and 73.33% for datasets 1 and 2, respectively, while achieving classification accuracies of 98.51% and 99.8%, respectively. The findings of this study highlight the strong capabilities of BGWO in reducing both the feature dimensionality and accuracy gained through classification. Furthermore, it demonstrates the effectiveness of wrapper methods in the reduction of feature sets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Computer Science Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ Computer Science is the new open access journal covering all subject areas in computer science, with the backing of a prestigious advisory board and more than 300 academic editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信