12种机器学习模型在预测COVID-19儿童死亡风险方面的比较性能:巴西一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究

IF 3.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
PeerJ Computer Science Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2916
Adriano Lages Dos Santos, Maria Christina L Oliveira, Enrico A Colosimo, Robert H Mak, Clara C Pinhati, Stella C Gallante, Hercílio Martelli-Júnior, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva, Eduardo A Oliveira
{"title":"12种机器学习模型在预测COVID-19儿童死亡风险方面的比较性能:巴西一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Adriano Lages Dos Santos, Maria Christina L Oliveira, Enrico A Colosimo, Robert H Mak, Clara C Pinhati, Stella C Gallante, Hercílio Martelli-Júnior, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva, Eduardo A Oliveira","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.2916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the application of advanced digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) to predict mortality in adult patients. However, the development of machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcomes in children and adolescents with COVID-19 remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of multiple machine learning models in forecasting mortality among hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients. In this cohort study, we used the SIVEP-Gripe dataset, a public resource maintained by the Ministry of Health, to track severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Brazil. To create subsets for training and testing the machine learning (ML) models, we divided the primary dataset into three parts. Using these subsets, we developed and trained 12 ML algorithms to predict the outcomes. We assessed the performance of these models using various metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among the 37 variables examined, 24 were found to be potential indicators of mortality, as determined by the chi-square test of independence. The Logistic Regression (LR) algorithm achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 92.5% and an AUC of 80.1%, on the optimized dataset. Gradient boosting classifier (GBC) and AdaBoost (ADA), closely followed the LR algorithm, producing similar results. Our study also revealed that baseline reduced oxygen saturation, presence of comorbidities, and older age were the most relevant factors in predicting mortality in children and adolescents hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The use of ML models can be an asset in making clinical decisions and implementing evidence-based patient management strategies, which can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of medical care. LR, GBC, and ADA models have demonstrated efficiency in accurately predicting mortality in COVID-19 pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54224,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2916"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Adriano Lages Dos Santos, Maria Christina L Oliveira, Enrico A Colosimo, Robert H Mak, Clara C Pinhati, Stella C Gallante, Hercílio Martelli-Júnior, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva, Eduardo A Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.7717/peerj-cs.2916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the application of advanced digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) to predict mortality in adult patients. However, the development of machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcomes in children and adolescents with COVID-19 remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of multiple machine learning models in forecasting mortality among hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients. In this cohort study, we used the SIVEP-Gripe dataset, a public resource maintained by the Ministry of Health, to track severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Brazil. To create subsets for training and testing the machine learning (ML) models, we divided the primary dataset into three parts. Using these subsets, we developed and trained 12 ML algorithms to predict the outcomes. We assessed the performance of these models using various metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among the 37 variables examined, 24 were found to be potential indicators of mortality, as determined by the chi-square test of independence. The Logistic Regression (LR) algorithm achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 92.5% and an AUC of 80.1%, on the optimized dataset. Gradient boosting classifier (GBC) and AdaBoost (ADA), closely followed the LR algorithm, producing similar results. Our study also revealed that baseline reduced oxygen saturation, presence of comorbidities, and older age were the most relevant factors in predicting mortality in children and adolescents hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The use of ML models can be an asset in making clinical decisions and implementing evidence-based patient management strategies, which can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of medical care. LR, GBC, and ADA models have demonstrated efficiency in accurately predicting mortality in COVID-19 pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情推动了人工智能(AI)等先进数字技术在成年患者死亡率预测方面的应用。然而,用于预测COVID-19儿童和青少年预后的机器学习(ML)模型的发展仍然有限。本研究旨在评估多种机器学习模型在预测住院儿童COVID-19患者死亡率方面的性能。在这项队列研究中,我们使用由卫生部维护的公共资源SIVEP-Gripe数据集来跟踪巴西的严重急性呼吸系统综合征(SARS)。为了创建用于训练和测试机器学习(ML)模型的子集,我们将主数据集分为三个部分。利用这些子集,我们开发并训练了12个ML算法来预测结果。我们使用各种指标评估这些模型的性能,如准确性、精密度、灵敏度、召回率和接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。在检查的37个变量中,通过卡方独立性检验确定了24个变量是死亡率的潜在指标。Logistic回归(LR)算法在优化后的数据集上取得了最高的性能,准确率为92.5%,AUC为80.1%。梯度增强分类器(GBC)和AdaBoost (ADA)紧随LR算法,产生相似的结果。我们的研究还显示,基线血氧饱和度降低、合并症的存在和年龄是预测因SARS-CoV-2感染住院的儿童和青少年死亡率的最相关因素。机器学习模型的使用在制定临床决策和实施基于证据的患者管理策略方面是一项资产,可以提高患者的治疗效果和整体医疗质量。LR、GBC和ADA模型在准确预测COVID-19儿科患者死亡率方面已证明是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.

The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the application of advanced digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) to predict mortality in adult patients. However, the development of machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcomes in children and adolescents with COVID-19 remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of multiple machine learning models in forecasting mortality among hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients. In this cohort study, we used the SIVEP-Gripe dataset, a public resource maintained by the Ministry of Health, to track severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Brazil. To create subsets for training and testing the machine learning (ML) models, we divided the primary dataset into three parts. Using these subsets, we developed and trained 12 ML algorithms to predict the outcomes. We assessed the performance of these models using various metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among the 37 variables examined, 24 were found to be potential indicators of mortality, as determined by the chi-square test of independence. The Logistic Regression (LR) algorithm achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 92.5% and an AUC of 80.1%, on the optimized dataset. Gradient boosting classifier (GBC) and AdaBoost (ADA), closely followed the LR algorithm, producing similar results. Our study also revealed that baseline reduced oxygen saturation, presence of comorbidities, and older age were the most relevant factors in predicting mortality in children and adolescents hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The use of ML models can be an asset in making clinical decisions and implementing evidence-based patient management strategies, which can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of medical care. LR, GBC, and ADA models have demonstrated efficiency in accurately predicting mortality in COVID-19 pediatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Computer Science Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ Computer Science is the new open access journal covering all subject areas in computer science, with the backing of a prestigious advisory board and more than 300 academic editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信