临时自采样HPV检测对下一轮筛查吸收的连锁反应:ACCESS随机对照试验的二次分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Misuzu Fujita, Kengo Nagashima, Minobu Shimazu, Misae Suzuki, Ichiro Tauchi, Miwa Sakuma, Setsuko Yamamoto, Hideki Hanaoka, Makio Shozu, Nobuhide Tsuruoka, Tokuzo Kasai, Akira Hata
{"title":"临时自采样HPV检测对下一轮筛查吸收的连锁反应:ACCESS随机对照试验的二次分析。","authors":"Misuzu Fujita, Kengo Nagashima, Minobu Shimazu, Misae Suzuki, Ichiro Tauchi, Miwa Sakuma, Setsuko Yamamoto, Hideki Hanaoka, Makio Shozu, Nobuhide Tsuruoka, Tokuzo Kasai, Akira Hata","doi":"10.1177/09691413251352999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) test improves participation in cervical cancer screening. However, the ripple effect of this test on participation in the next screening round has not yet been examined. This study, a secondary analysis of the Accelerating Cervical Cancer Elimination by Self-Sampling test (ACCESS) trial, aims to clarify this effect. Women who had not participated in the cervical cancer screening program of Ichihara City for 3 years or more were included. The participants were randomly assigned to intervention (<i>n</i> = 7337) and control groups (<i>n</i> = 7770). In the initial round, the intervention group could perform a self-sampling HPV test or undergo cytology as the primary screening method, while the control group could undergo cytology only. In the next round, both groups could undergo cytology. In intention-to-screen analysis, screening uptake in the next round was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3%, 10.7%) in the intervention group and 10.2% (95% CI: 9.5%, 10.8%) in the control group, with no significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.717). In conclusion, offering a one-time self-sampling HPV test had no effect on screening uptake in the next round, suggesting that the test needs to be offered on an ongoing basis to continuously improve screening uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413251352999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ripple effect of temporary self-sampling HPV test on screening uptake in the next round: A secondary analysis of the ACCESS randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Misuzu Fujita, Kengo Nagashima, Minobu Shimazu, Misae Suzuki, Ichiro Tauchi, Miwa Sakuma, Setsuko Yamamoto, Hideki Hanaoka, Makio Shozu, Nobuhide Tsuruoka, Tokuzo Kasai, Akira Hata\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413251352999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) test improves participation in cervical cancer screening. However, the ripple effect of this test on participation in the next screening round has not yet been examined. This study, a secondary analysis of the Accelerating Cervical Cancer Elimination by Self-Sampling test (ACCESS) trial, aims to clarify this effect. Women who had not participated in the cervical cancer screening program of Ichihara City for 3 years or more were included. The participants were randomly assigned to intervention (<i>n</i> = 7337) and control groups (<i>n</i> = 7770). In the initial round, the intervention group could perform a self-sampling HPV test or undergo cytology as the primary screening method, while the control group could undergo cytology only. In the next round, both groups could undergo cytology. In intention-to-screen analysis, screening uptake in the next round was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3%, 10.7%) in the intervention group and 10.2% (95% CI: 9.5%, 10.8%) in the control group, with no significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.717). In conclusion, offering a one-time self-sampling HPV test had no effect on screening uptake in the next round, suggesting that the test needs to be offered on an ongoing basis to continuously improve screening uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9691413251352999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251352999\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251352999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我抽样测试提高参与子宫颈癌筛查。然而,这一测试对参加下一轮筛选的连锁反应尚未得到审查。本研究通过对ACCESS试验的二次分析,旨在阐明这一效应。研究对象为3年及以上未参加市原市宫颈癌筛查计划的妇女。参与者被随机分为干预组(n = 7337)和对照组(n = 7770)。在第一轮中,干预组可以进行HPV自采样检测或细胞学检查作为主要筛查方法,而对照组只能进行细胞学检查。下一轮,两组都将接受细胞学检查。在意向筛查分析中,干预组下一轮的筛查吸收率为10.0%(95%可信区间[CI]: 9.3%, 10.7%),对照组为10.2% (95% CI: 9.5%, 10.8%),组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.717)。总之,提供一次性自采样HPV检测对下一轮的筛查吸收没有影响,这表明需要持续提供该检测以不断提高筛查吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ripple effect of temporary self-sampling HPV test on screening uptake in the next round: A secondary analysis of the ACCESS randomized controlled trial.

The self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) test improves participation in cervical cancer screening. However, the ripple effect of this test on participation in the next screening round has not yet been examined. This study, a secondary analysis of the Accelerating Cervical Cancer Elimination by Self-Sampling test (ACCESS) trial, aims to clarify this effect. Women who had not participated in the cervical cancer screening program of Ichihara City for 3 years or more were included. The participants were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 7337) and control groups (n = 7770). In the initial round, the intervention group could perform a self-sampling HPV test or undergo cytology as the primary screening method, while the control group could undergo cytology only. In the next round, both groups could undergo cytology. In intention-to-screen analysis, screening uptake in the next round was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3%, 10.7%) in the intervention group and 10.2% (95% CI: 9.5%, 10.8%) in the control group, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.717). In conclusion, offering a one-time self-sampling HPV test had no effect on screening uptake in the next round, suggesting that the test needs to be offered on an ongoing basis to continuously improve screening uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信