引导:开放获取资源进行结构化专家启发卫生保健决策。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dina Jankovic, James Horscroft, Dawn Lee, Laura Bojke, Marta Soares
{"title":"引导:开放获取资源进行结构化专家启发卫生保健决策。","authors":"Dina Jankovic, James Horscroft, Dawn Lee, Laura Bojke, Marta Soares","doi":"10.1177/0272989X251343013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a landscape of accelerated approvals and a less mature evidence base, constrained health systems make reimbursement decisions based on uncertain evidence about the expected clinical and economic value of a health technology. Uncertain decisions require expert judgments, and there has recently been a drive to improve the accountability and transparency in the way these judgments are collected and reported. Structured expert elicitation (SEE) refers to formal methods to quantify experts' judgments. Protocols for conducting SEE exist; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation. This article describes the development of Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER), a collection of open access resources based on a published protocol for SEE specific to the health care decision-making (HCDM) setting. The resources cover the entire SEE process from design to reporting. The resources include an overview and a practical guide for conducting SEE in this setting, adaptable tools for building bespoke SEE exercises, training materials for experts taking part in SEE, resources used in previous SEE exercises, and examples of published SEE in HCDM. The materials cover practical considerations such as timelines team skills requirements, and administrative requirements such as contracting. The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in HCDM while maintaining robustness.HighlightsThere is a drive to improve accountability and transparency in the way expert judgments are used in health care decision making; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation.Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER) is a collection of open access resources for conducting SEE in health care decision making, based on a published methods protocol for SEE specific to this setting.The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in health care decision making while maintaining robustness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"272989X251343013"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STEER: Open Access Resources for Conducting Structured Expert Elicitation for Health Care Decision Making.\",\"authors\":\"Dina Jankovic, James Horscroft, Dawn Lee, Laura Bojke, Marta Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0272989X251343013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a landscape of accelerated approvals and a less mature evidence base, constrained health systems make reimbursement decisions based on uncertain evidence about the expected clinical and economic value of a health technology. Uncertain decisions require expert judgments, and there has recently been a drive to improve the accountability and transparency in the way these judgments are collected and reported. Structured expert elicitation (SEE) refers to formal methods to quantify experts' judgments. Protocols for conducting SEE exist; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation. This article describes the development of Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER), a collection of open access resources based on a published protocol for SEE specific to the health care decision-making (HCDM) setting. The resources cover the entire SEE process from design to reporting. The resources include an overview and a practical guide for conducting SEE in this setting, adaptable tools for building bespoke SEE exercises, training materials for experts taking part in SEE, resources used in previous SEE exercises, and examples of published SEE in HCDM. The materials cover practical considerations such as timelines team skills requirements, and administrative requirements such as contracting. The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in HCDM while maintaining robustness.HighlightsThere is a drive to improve accountability and transparency in the way expert judgments are used in health care decision making; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation.Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER) is a collection of open access resources for conducting SEE in health care decision making, based on a published methods protocol for SEE specific to this setting.The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in health care decision making while maintaining robustness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"272989X251343013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251343013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251343013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在审批加速和证据基础不太成熟的情况下,受到限制的卫生系统根据有关卫生技术的预期临床和经济价值的不确定证据做出报销决定。不确定的决定需要专家的判断,最近在收集和报告这些判断的方式上,已经有了提高问责制和透明度的努力。结构化专家启发(SEE)是一种量化专家判断的形式化方法。实施SEE的协议已经存在;然而,SEE的时间和资源需求以及缺乏简单的实施工具是实施的潜在障碍。本文描述了结构化专家启发资源(STEER)的开发,这是一个基于特定于医疗保健决策(HCDM)设置的SEE公开协议的开放获取资源集合。这些资源涵盖了从设计到报告的整个SEE流程。这些资源包括在这种情况下进行SEE的概述和实践指南,定制SEE练习的适应性工具,参与SEE的专家培训材料,以前SEE练习中使用的资源,以及在HCDM中发表的SEE示例。这些材料涵盖了实际的考虑,如时间表、团队技能需求和管理需求,如合同。使用现成的资源可以简化HCDM中的SEE过程,同时保持鲁棒性。在卫生保健决策中使用专家判断的方式方面,有一项改进问责制和透明度的努力;然而,SEE的时间和资源需求以及缺乏简单的实施工具是实施的潜在障碍。结构化专家启发资源(STEER)是一个开放获取资源的集合,用于在医疗保健决策中指导SEE,基于针对该环境的SEE已发布的方法协议。使用现成资源可以在保持稳健性的同时,简化医疗保健决策中的SEE流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STEER: Open Access Resources for Conducting Structured Expert Elicitation for Health Care Decision Making.

In a landscape of accelerated approvals and a less mature evidence base, constrained health systems make reimbursement decisions based on uncertain evidence about the expected clinical and economic value of a health technology. Uncertain decisions require expert judgments, and there has recently been a drive to improve the accountability and transparency in the way these judgments are collected and reported. Structured expert elicitation (SEE) refers to formal methods to quantify experts' judgments. Protocols for conducting SEE exist; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation. This article describes the development of Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER), a collection of open access resources based on a published protocol for SEE specific to the health care decision-making (HCDM) setting. The resources cover the entire SEE process from design to reporting. The resources include an overview and a practical guide for conducting SEE in this setting, adaptable tools for building bespoke SEE exercises, training materials for experts taking part in SEE, resources used in previous SEE exercises, and examples of published SEE in HCDM. The materials cover practical considerations such as timelines team skills requirements, and administrative requirements such as contracting. The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in HCDM while maintaining robustness.HighlightsThere is a drive to improve accountability and transparency in the way expert judgments are used in health care decision making; however, the time and resource requirements of SEE and the lack of simple tools for its implementation are potential deterrents to its implementation.Structured Expert Elicitation Resources (STEER) is a collection of open access resources for conducting SEE in health care decision making, based on a published methods protocol for SEE specific to this setting.The use of off-the-shelf resources can streamline the SEE process in health care decision making while maintaining robustness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信