将全球卫生行动的船只驶入波涛汹涌的大海:在莫桑比克引入全球融资机制。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2025.2518651
Andes Chivangue, Mary V Kinney, Damiano Stella, Denise Namburete, Asha S George
{"title":"将全球卫生行动的船只驶入波涛汹涌的大海:在莫桑比克引入全球融资机制。","authors":"Andes Chivangue, Mary V Kinney, Damiano Stella, Denise Namburete, Asha S George","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2518651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mozambique joined the Global Financing Facility (GFF), a financing mechanism to accelerate progress for women, children, and adolescents' health, with a history of donor dependence, distrust in public finances, and social inequities. Few independent studies have assessed the GFF.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand how a global mechanism, such as the GFF, was introduced and utilized in Mozambique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study explored the aid coordination dynamics between 2015 and 2020 linked to the development of the Investment Case (IC) and Project Appraisal Document (PAD), key national GFF planning documents, based on data from 25 documents and 14 qualitative interviews thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GFF was not fully understood by stakeholders and initially gained traction in the name of strengthening the health system, ironically amidst prevailing distrust of government systems. Some viewed the IC as consultatively developed, aiding the Ministry of Health in prioritizing issues and convening donors, while others remained sceptical about its impact. The PAD was viewed as a less consultative process, though it engaged the government and partners in setting disbursement-linked indicators (DLIs) to incentivize health system improvements. However, some stakeholders viewed them as unfeasible, while others were excluded by technical discourse. The perceived transparency issues around DLIs fuelled scepticism.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the GFF policy processes provided a technically alluring basis for addressing Mozambique's health disparities, respondents revealed nuanced perspectives about how IC and PAD were formulated and followed. Aid coordination reflects various interdependencies, power dynamics, and uncertainties that require active relationship management and long-term institution building.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2518651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sailing global health initiative ships into stormy seas: navigating the introduction of the Global Financing Facility in Mozambique.\",\"authors\":\"Andes Chivangue, Mary V Kinney, Damiano Stella, Denise Namburete, Asha S George\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2025.2518651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mozambique joined the Global Financing Facility (GFF), a financing mechanism to accelerate progress for women, children, and adolescents' health, with a history of donor dependence, distrust in public finances, and social inequities. Few independent studies have assessed the GFF.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand how a global mechanism, such as the GFF, was introduced and utilized in Mozambique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study explored the aid coordination dynamics between 2015 and 2020 linked to the development of the Investment Case (IC) and Project Appraisal Document (PAD), key national GFF planning documents, based on data from 25 documents and 14 qualitative interviews thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GFF was not fully understood by stakeholders and initially gained traction in the name of strengthening the health system, ironically amidst prevailing distrust of government systems. Some viewed the IC as consultatively developed, aiding the Ministry of Health in prioritizing issues and convening donors, while others remained sceptical about its impact. The PAD was viewed as a less consultative process, though it engaged the government and partners in setting disbursement-linked indicators (DLIs) to incentivize health system improvements. However, some stakeholders viewed them as unfeasible, while others were excluded by technical discourse. The perceived transparency issues around DLIs fuelled scepticism.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the GFF policy processes provided a technically alluring basis for addressing Mozambique's health disparities, respondents revealed nuanced perspectives about how IC and PAD were formulated and followed. Aid coordination reflects various interdependencies, power dynamics, and uncertainties that require active relationship management and long-term institution building.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2518651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2518651\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2518651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:莫桑比克加入了全球融资基金(GFF),这是一个加速妇女、儿童和青少年健康进展的融资机制,但该国有依赖捐助者、不信任公共财政和社会不公平的历史。很少有独立研究评估GFF。目的:了解全球机制,如GFF,是如何在莫桑比克引入和利用的。方法:基于25份文件和14次定性访谈的数据,对2015 - 2020年与国家GFF重点规划文件《投资案例》(IC)和《项目评估文件》(PAD)相关的援助协调动态进行了定性研究。结果:GFF没有被利益相关者完全理解,最初以加强卫生系统的名义获得了支持,具有讽刺意味的是,当时人们普遍不信任政府系统。一些人认为协调委员会是协商制定的,帮助卫生部确定问题的优先次序和召集捐助者,而另一些人则对其影响持怀疑态度。发展伙伴关系被视为一个较少协商的过程,尽管它让政府和合作伙伴参与制定与支出挂钩的指标(DLIs),以激励卫生系统的改进。然而,一些利益相关者认为它们不可行,而其他利益相关者则被技术话语排除在外。人们觉察到的有关DLIs的透明度问题引发了怀疑。结论:尽管GFF政策进程在技术上为解决莫桑比克的健康差距提供了诱人的基础,但受访者对如何制定和遵循IC和PAD提出了细微的看法。援助协调反映了各种相互依赖性、权力动态和不确定性,需要积极的关系管理和长期的制度建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sailing global health initiative ships into stormy seas: navigating the introduction of the Global Financing Facility in Mozambique.

Background: Mozambique joined the Global Financing Facility (GFF), a financing mechanism to accelerate progress for women, children, and adolescents' health, with a history of donor dependence, distrust in public finances, and social inequities. Few independent studies have assessed the GFF.

Objectives: To understand how a global mechanism, such as the GFF, was introduced and utilized in Mozambique.

Methods: This qualitative study explored the aid coordination dynamics between 2015 and 2020 linked to the development of the Investment Case (IC) and Project Appraisal Document (PAD), key national GFF planning documents, based on data from 25 documents and 14 qualitative interviews thematically analyzed.

Results: The GFF was not fully understood by stakeholders and initially gained traction in the name of strengthening the health system, ironically amidst prevailing distrust of government systems. Some viewed the IC as consultatively developed, aiding the Ministry of Health in prioritizing issues and convening donors, while others remained sceptical about its impact. The PAD was viewed as a less consultative process, though it engaged the government and partners in setting disbursement-linked indicators (DLIs) to incentivize health system improvements. However, some stakeholders viewed them as unfeasible, while others were excluded by technical discourse. The perceived transparency issues around DLIs fuelled scepticism.

Conclusion: Although the GFF policy processes provided a technically alluring basis for addressing Mozambique's health disparities, respondents revealed nuanced perspectives about how IC and PAD were formulated and followed. Aid coordination reflects various interdependencies, power dynamics, and uncertainties that require active relationship management and long-term institution building.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信