内窥镜下后颈椎椎间孔切开术和椎间盘切除术。

IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003
Micheal Raad, Peter Derman
{"title":"内窥镜下后颈椎椎间孔切开术和椎间盘切除术。","authors":"Micheal Raad, Peter Derman","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open posterior cervical foraminotomy has been shown to be comparable with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy<sup>1,2</sup>. More recently, posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy was described as an ultra-minimally invasive technique that allows for neural decompression in cervical radiculopathy. This technique has been shown to have excellent clinical outcomes with a short length of hospital stay and low postoperative pain levels<sup>3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The procedure is performed with the patient in the prone position under general anesthesia. Fluoroscopy is utilized to mark out the incision and target the medial-most aspect of the facet at the level of foraminal stenosis. Sequential dilators are then inserted to create a working canal, and the endoscope is introduced. Soft tissue is cleared until the classic \"V\" interlaminar anatomic landmark is visualized. The superior edge of the cephalad lamina and the inferior articular process are resected until the superior articular process is identified. The superior articular process is then thinned out with use of a diamond burr and resected carefully with use of a Kerrison punch, allowing visualization of the nerve beneath. Decompression should be wide, carried out from pedicle to pedicle and as laterally as required. A discectomy may be performed at this stage.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternatives include open posterior cervical foraminotomy, ACDF, and cervical disc arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>In the case of isolated cervical radiculopathy, the pathology is limited to the foramen. The foramen may be approached either anteriorly or posteriorly. However, in order to successfully address the foramen anteriorly, a complete discectomy should be performed. In such cases, either a fusion or disc arthroplasty should be performed concurrently with the discectomy. Both fusion and disc arthroplasty are associated with complications such as adjacent segment degeneration, implant subsidence, infection, nonunion, and others<sup>4</sup>. Posterior foraminotomy allows for successful neural decompression posteriorly, but when performed in an open fashion it requires substantial soft-tissue dissection for an appropriate exposure, which may result in notable postoperative neck pain. Posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy addresses many of these shortcomings because it allows for successful neural decompression through an endoscope, with minimal soft-tissue dissection; maintains range of motion; and preserves most of the disc at that level<sup>4</sup>. Furthermore, this technique does not preclude or complicate the ability to perform a full discectomy anteriorly in the future, if needed.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy has been shown to have excellent clinical outcomes; however, as with any spinal surgery, it carries a risk of complications. Kim et al. compared outcomes between uniportal endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, biportal endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, and tubular cervical foraminotomy. All 3 techniques demonstrated similar outcomes at 1 month in terms of pain improvement; however, length of hospital stay and overall complication rates were lowest in the uniportal endoscopy group<sup>5</sup>. In a recent meta-analysis, Guo et al. compared endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and ACDF for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Postoperative pain, symptom resolution, and complication rates were similar between procedures. The most common complications were cage subsidence and dysphagia for ACDF compared with nerve root palsy for endoscopic foraminotomy<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Dropping your hands medially allows for undercutting of the inferior articular process, maximizing foraminal expansion while preserving as much facet joint as possible. At least 50% of the facet joint should be maintained in order to avoid iatrogenic instability.To improve hemostasis, transiently increase fluid pressure by obstructing fluid outflow or advancing the endoscope. Pump pressure settings can also be temporarily increased if needed; however, care must be taken not to compromise intrathecal circulation or elevate intracranial pressure.Pulling disc fragments straight out frequently results in fragmentation. Instead, we recommend maintaining a gentle grasp and utilizing a twisting motion to extract disc herniations in the case of larger fragments.Understand the learning curve for performing posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and plan accordingly for case duration<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>PECF = posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomyLOS = length of stayIAP = inferior articular processSAP = superior articular processNSAID = nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugMRI = magnetic resonance imagingOR = operating roomAP = anteroposteriorVAS = visual analog scaleUPE = uniportal endoscopyBP = biportal endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Micheal Raad, Peter Derman\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open posterior cervical foraminotomy has been shown to be comparable with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy<sup>1,2</sup>. More recently, posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy was described as an ultra-minimally invasive technique that allows for neural decompression in cervical radiculopathy. This technique has been shown to have excellent clinical outcomes with a short length of hospital stay and low postoperative pain levels<sup>3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The procedure is performed with the patient in the prone position under general anesthesia. Fluoroscopy is utilized to mark out the incision and target the medial-most aspect of the facet at the level of foraminal stenosis. Sequential dilators are then inserted to create a working canal, and the endoscope is introduced. Soft tissue is cleared until the classic \\\"V\\\" interlaminar anatomic landmark is visualized. The superior edge of the cephalad lamina and the inferior articular process are resected until the superior articular process is identified. The superior articular process is then thinned out with use of a diamond burr and resected carefully with use of a Kerrison punch, allowing visualization of the nerve beneath. Decompression should be wide, carried out from pedicle to pedicle and as laterally as required. A discectomy may be performed at this stage.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternatives include open posterior cervical foraminotomy, ACDF, and cervical disc arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>In the case of isolated cervical radiculopathy, the pathology is limited to the foramen. The foramen may be approached either anteriorly or posteriorly. However, in order to successfully address the foramen anteriorly, a complete discectomy should be performed. In such cases, either a fusion or disc arthroplasty should be performed concurrently with the discectomy. Both fusion and disc arthroplasty are associated with complications such as adjacent segment degeneration, implant subsidence, infection, nonunion, and others<sup>4</sup>. Posterior foraminotomy allows for successful neural decompression posteriorly, but when performed in an open fashion it requires substantial soft-tissue dissection for an appropriate exposure, which may result in notable postoperative neck pain. Posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy addresses many of these shortcomings because it allows for successful neural decompression through an endoscope, with minimal soft-tissue dissection; maintains range of motion; and preserves most of the disc at that level<sup>4</sup>. Furthermore, this technique does not preclude or complicate the ability to perform a full discectomy anteriorly in the future, if needed.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy has been shown to have excellent clinical outcomes; however, as with any spinal surgery, it carries a risk of complications. Kim et al. compared outcomes between uniportal endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, biportal endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, and tubular cervical foraminotomy. All 3 techniques demonstrated similar outcomes at 1 month in terms of pain improvement; however, length of hospital stay and overall complication rates were lowest in the uniportal endoscopy group<sup>5</sup>. In a recent meta-analysis, Guo et al. compared endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and ACDF for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Postoperative pain, symptom resolution, and complication rates were similar between procedures. The most common complications were cage subsidence and dysphagia for ACDF compared with nerve root palsy for endoscopic foraminotomy<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Dropping your hands medially allows for undercutting of the inferior articular process, maximizing foraminal expansion while preserving as much facet joint as possible. At least 50% of the facet joint should be maintained in order to avoid iatrogenic instability.To improve hemostasis, transiently increase fluid pressure by obstructing fluid outflow or advancing the endoscope. Pump pressure settings can also be temporarily increased if needed; however, care must be taken not to compromise intrathecal circulation or elevate intracranial pressure.Pulling disc fragments straight out frequently results in fragmentation. Instead, we recommend maintaining a gentle grasp and utilizing a twisting motion to extract disc herniations in the case of larger fragments.Understand the learning curve for performing posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and plan accordingly for case duration<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>PECF = posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomyLOS = length of stayIAP = inferior articular processSAP = superior articular processNSAID = nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugMRI = magnetic resonance imagingOR = operating roomAP = anteroposteriorVAS = visual analog scaleUPE = uniportal endoscopyBP = biportal endoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开放式后颈椎椎间孔切开术已被证明与前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)治疗颈椎神经根病的疗效相当1,2。最近,后路内窥镜颈椎椎间孔切开术被描述为一种超微创技术,可用于颈椎神经根病的神经减压。该技术已被证明具有良好的临床效果,住院时间短,术后疼痛程度低。手术在全身麻醉下,患者俯卧位进行。在椎间孔狭窄的水平上使用透视来标记切口并瞄准小关节面最内侧的侧面。然后依次插入扩张器以形成工作管,并引入内窥镜。清除软组织,直到看到典型的“V”型层间解剖标志。切除头椎板上缘和下关节突,直到确定上关节突。然后用金刚石毛刺将上关节突削薄,并用Kerrison冲床仔细切除,使下面的神经可见。减压应宽,从椎弓根到椎弓根,并根据需要向外侧进行减压。这一阶段可行椎间盘切除术。备选方案:备选方案包括开放式后颈椎间孔切开术、ACDF和颈椎间盘置换术。理由:在孤立性颈椎神经根病的病例中,病理局限于椎孔。可以在前面或后面接近孔。然而,为了成功地解决前面的椎间孔,应该进行完全的椎间盘切除术。在这种情况下,椎间盘切除术应同时进行融合术或椎间盘置换术。融合术和椎间盘置换术都有并发症,如临近节段退变、假体下沉、感染、不愈合等。后路椎间孔切开术可以成功地进行后路神经减压,但当以开放方式进行时,需要大量的软组织剥离以进行适当的暴露,这可能导致明显的术后颈部疼痛。后路内窥镜颈椎椎间孔切开术解决了许多这些缺点,因为它允许通过内窥镜成功地进行神经减压,并尽量减少软组织剥离;保持活动范围;并使大部分椎间盘保持在那个水平。此外,如果将来需要,该技术不排除或复杂化前路全椎间盘切除术的能力。预期结果:内窥镜下颈椎后椎间孔切开术具有良好的临床效果;然而,与任何脊柱手术一样,它有并发症的风险。Kim等人比较了单门静脉内窥镜颈椎椎间孔切开术、双门静脉内窥镜颈椎椎间孔切开术和管状颈椎椎间孔切开术的结果。所有3种技术在1个月的疼痛改善方面表现出相似的结果;然而,单门静脉内镜组的住院时间和总并发症发生率最低5。在最近的荟萃分析中,Guo等比较了内窥镜颈椎椎间孔切开术和ACDF治疗颈椎神经根病的效果。两种手术的术后疼痛、症状缓解和并发症发生率相似。与内窥镜椎间孔切开术的神经根性麻痹相比,ACDF最常见的并发症是笼子下沉和吞咽困难6。重要提示:将手放在中间,可以削弱下关节突,最大限度地扩大椎间孔,同时尽可能多地保留小关节。至少50%的小关节应保持,以避免医源性不稳定。为了改善止血,可通过阻塞液体流出或推进内窥镜来短暂地增加液体压力。如果需要,也可以暂时增加泵的压力设置;然而,必须注意不要损害鞘内循环或升高颅内压。直接拔出磁盘碎片经常会导致碎片。相反,我们建议在较大碎片的情况下,保持轻柔的抓握并利用扭转运动来取出椎间盘突出。了解后路内窥镜颈椎椎间孔切开术的学习曲线,并据此制定疗程计划6。缩略语:PECF =后路内窥镜颈椎椎间孔肌los =停留长度iap =下关节突sap =上关节突nsaid =非甾体类抗炎药mri =磁共振成像or =手术室ap =正反位vas =视觉模拟量表upe =单门静脉内窥镜bp =双门静脉内窥镜
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy.

Background: Open posterior cervical foraminotomy has been shown to be comparable with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy1,2. More recently, posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy was described as an ultra-minimally invasive technique that allows for neural decompression in cervical radiculopathy. This technique has been shown to have excellent clinical outcomes with a short length of hospital stay and low postoperative pain levels3.

Description: The procedure is performed with the patient in the prone position under general anesthesia. Fluoroscopy is utilized to mark out the incision and target the medial-most aspect of the facet at the level of foraminal stenosis. Sequential dilators are then inserted to create a working canal, and the endoscope is introduced. Soft tissue is cleared until the classic "V" interlaminar anatomic landmark is visualized. The superior edge of the cephalad lamina and the inferior articular process are resected until the superior articular process is identified. The superior articular process is then thinned out with use of a diamond burr and resected carefully with use of a Kerrison punch, allowing visualization of the nerve beneath. Decompression should be wide, carried out from pedicle to pedicle and as laterally as required. A discectomy may be performed at this stage.

Alternatives: Alternatives include open posterior cervical foraminotomy, ACDF, and cervical disc arthroplasty.

Rationale: In the case of isolated cervical radiculopathy, the pathology is limited to the foramen. The foramen may be approached either anteriorly or posteriorly. However, in order to successfully address the foramen anteriorly, a complete discectomy should be performed. In such cases, either a fusion or disc arthroplasty should be performed concurrently with the discectomy. Both fusion and disc arthroplasty are associated with complications such as adjacent segment degeneration, implant subsidence, infection, nonunion, and others4. Posterior foraminotomy allows for successful neural decompression posteriorly, but when performed in an open fashion it requires substantial soft-tissue dissection for an appropriate exposure, which may result in notable postoperative neck pain. Posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy addresses many of these shortcomings because it allows for successful neural decompression through an endoscope, with minimal soft-tissue dissection; maintains range of motion; and preserves most of the disc at that level4. Furthermore, this technique does not preclude or complicate the ability to perform a full discectomy anteriorly in the future, if needed.

Expected outcomes: Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy has been shown to have excellent clinical outcomes; however, as with any spinal surgery, it carries a risk of complications. Kim et al. compared outcomes between uniportal endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, biportal endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, and tubular cervical foraminotomy. All 3 techniques demonstrated similar outcomes at 1 month in terms of pain improvement; however, length of hospital stay and overall complication rates were lowest in the uniportal endoscopy group5. In a recent meta-analysis, Guo et al. compared endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and ACDF for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Postoperative pain, symptom resolution, and complication rates were similar between procedures. The most common complications were cage subsidence and dysphagia for ACDF compared with nerve root palsy for endoscopic foraminotomy6.

Important tips: Dropping your hands medially allows for undercutting of the inferior articular process, maximizing foraminal expansion while preserving as much facet joint as possible. At least 50% of the facet joint should be maintained in order to avoid iatrogenic instability.To improve hemostasis, transiently increase fluid pressure by obstructing fluid outflow or advancing the endoscope. Pump pressure settings can also be temporarily increased if needed; however, care must be taken not to compromise intrathecal circulation or elevate intracranial pressure.Pulling disc fragments straight out frequently results in fragmentation. Instead, we recommend maintaining a gentle grasp and utilizing a twisting motion to extract disc herniations in the case of larger fragments.Understand the learning curve for performing posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and plan accordingly for case duration6.

Acronyms and abbreviations: PECF = posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomyLOS = length of stayIAP = inferior articular processSAP = superior articular processNSAID = nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugMRI = magnetic resonance imagingOR = operating roomAP = anteroposteriorVAS = visual analog scaleUPE = uniportal endoscopyBP = biportal endoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信