非英语首选患者急诊入院和等待时间差异的评估。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
John Wong-Castillo, Daniel Berger, Juan Carlos Montoy, Riham Alwan
{"title":"非英语首选患者急诊入院和等待时间差异的评估。","authors":"John Wong-Castillo, Daniel Berger, Juan Carlos Montoy, Riham Alwan","doi":"10.5811/westjem.21242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients who prefer to communicate in a language other than English are vulnerable to the consequences of medical communication barriers. Studies of non-English language preferred (NELP) and English language preferred (ELP) patients have shown differences in rates of hospital admission and wait times-factors known to be related to increased costs and lower patient satisfaction. However, few studies include languages other than Spanish or account for patient acuity level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study at an urban, Level I trauma center from January-December 2020. Patients were grouped by language preference, with NELP languages grouped into three categories: Spanish; Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Taishanese, Taiwanese, and Zhongshan-Chinese dialect); and other (all other remaining languages). We extracted age, sex, race, ethnicity, language preference, emergency department (ED) discharge disposition, and Emergency Severity Index Score (ESI) from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was the hospital admission rate. Secondary outcomes were the time from patient arrival to placement in the treatment room and the time from patient arrival to disposition. We analyzed data with chi-square tests, logistic, and linear regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58,079 unique ED encounters, 26.4% (15,307) patients identified as NELP. Within NELP patient encounters, 75.0% preferred Spanish, 13.9% preferred Chinese, and 11.1% preferred another language. After adjusting for age and acuity, Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients were at 16% and 14% higher odds of admission, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.23 and OR 1.14, CI 1.02-1.27 respectively), compared to ELP patients. NELP patients waited an average 5.4 minutes longer to be roomed (95% CI 4.46-6.29) and 15.6 minutes longer until disposition (95% CI 12.62-18.54, P<0.05). This discrepancy was greater for patients triaged at lower acuities, with ESI 5 Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients waiting an average of 50.3 and 90.6 minutes longer than ELP patients until disposition (95% CI 17.67-83.57; and 95% CI 24.31-81.57 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After adjusting for acuity level and age, non-English language preferred patients were at higher odds of admission and experienced disparate wait times, especially at lower acuity levels. Further investigation is needed to understand the causes of these differences and mitigate these health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"415-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Disparities in Emergency Department Admission and Wait Times for Non-English Preferred Patients.\",\"authors\":\"John Wong-Castillo, Daniel Berger, Juan Carlos Montoy, Riham Alwan\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.21242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients who prefer to communicate in a language other than English are vulnerable to the consequences of medical communication barriers. Studies of non-English language preferred (NELP) and English language preferred (ELP) patients have shown differences in rates of hospital admission and wait times-factors known to be related to increased costs and lower patient satisfaction. However, few studies include languages other than Spanish or account for patient acuity level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study at an urban, Level I trauma center from January-December 2020. Patients were grouped by language preference, with NELP languages grouped into three categories: Spanish; Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Taishanese, Taiwanese, and Zhongshan-Chinese dialect); and other (all other remaining languages). We extracted age, sex, race, ethnicity, language preference, emergency department (ED) discharge disposition, and Emergency Severity Index Score (ESI) from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was the hospital admission rate. Secondary outcomes were the time from patient arrival to placement in the treatment room and the time from patient arrival to disposition. We analyzed data with chi-square tests, logistic, and linear regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58,079 unique ED encounters, 26.4% (15,307) patients identified as NELP. Within NELP patient encounters, 75.0% preferred Spanish, 13.9% preferred Chinese, and 11.1% preferred another language. After adjusting for age and acuity, Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients were at 16% and 14% higher odds of admission, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.23 and OR 1.14, CI 1.02-1.27 respectively), compared to ELP patients. NELP patients waited an average 5.4 minutes longer to be roomed (95% CI 4.46-6.29) and 15.6 minutes longer until disposition (95% CI 12.62-18.54, P<0.05). This discrepancy was greater for patients triaged at lower acuities, with ESI 5 Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients waiting an average of 50.3 and 90.6 minutes longer than ELP patients until disposition (95% CI 17.67-83.57; and 95% CI 24.31-81.57 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After adjusting for acuity level and age, non-English language preferred patients were at higher odds of admission and experienced disparate wait times, especially at lower acuity levels. Further investigation is needed to understand the causes of these differences and mitigate these health inequities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"415-424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.21242\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.21242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:喜欢用英语以外的语言进行交流的患者容易受到医疗沟通障碍的影响。对非英语优先(NELP)和英语优先(ELP)患者的研究表明,住院率和等待时间存在差异,这些因素已知与成本增加和患者满意度降低有关。然而,很少有研究包括西班牙语以外的语言或考虑患者的视力水平。方法:我们于2020年1月至12月在城市一级创伤中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者按语言偏好分组,NELP语言分为三类:西班牙语;汉语(普通话、广东话、台语、台语、中山话);和其他(所有其他剩余的语言)。我们从电子健康记录中提取年龄、性别、种族、民族、语言偏好、急诊科(ED)出院处置和急诊严重程度指数评分(ESI)。主要观察指标是住院率。次要结果是从患者到达治疗室到安置的时间以及从患者到达处置的时间。我们用卡方检验、逻辑分析和线性回归分析数据。结果:在58079例独特ED遭遇中,26.4%(15307例)患者被确定为NELP。在急诊病人中,75.0%的人喜欢西班牙语,13.9%的人喜欢中文,11.1%的人喜欢其他语言。在调整了年龄和视力后,与ELP患者相比,西班牙语和汉语首选患者的入院几率分别高出16%和14%(优势比[OR] 1.16, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.10-1.23和OR 1.14, CI 1.02-1.27)。NELP患者平均等待时间延长了5.4分钟(95% CI 4.46-6.29),等待时间延长了15.6分钟(95% CI 12.62-18.54)。结论:在调整了视力水平和年龄后,非英语语言偏好的患者入院的几率更高,等待时间也不同,尤其是在视力水平较低的患者。需要进一步调查以了解这些差异的原因并减轻这些卫生不公平现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Disparities in Emergency Department Admission and Wait Times for Non-English Preferred Patients.

Introduction: Patients who prefer to communicate in a language other than English are vulnerable to the consequences of medical communication barriers. Studies of non-English language preferred (NELP) and English language preferred (ELP) patients have shown differences in rates of hospital admission and wait times-factors known to be related to increased costs and lower patient satisfaction. However, few studies include languages other than Spanish or account for patient acuity level.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at an urban, Level I trauma center from January-December 2020. Patients were grouped by language preference, with NELP languages grouped into three categories: Spanish; Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Taishanese, Taiwanese, and Zhongshan-Chinese dialect); and other (all other remaining languages). We extracted age, sex, race, ethnicity, language preference, emergency department (ED) discharge disposition, and Emergency Severity Index Score (ESI) from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was the hospital admission rate. Secondary outcomes were the time from patient arrival to placement in the treatment room and the time from patient arrival to disposition. We analyzed data with chi-square tests, logistic, and linear regressions.

Results: Of the 58,079 unique ED encounters, 26.4% (15,307) patients identified as NELP. Within NELP patient encounters, 75.0% preferred Spanish, 13.9% preferred Chinese, and 11.1% preferred another language. After adjusting for age and acuity, Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients were at 16% and 14% higher odds of admission, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.23 and OR 1.14, CI 1.02-1.27 respectively), compared to ELP patients. NELP patients waited an average 5.4 minutes longer to be roomed (95% CI 4.46-6.29) and 15.6 minutes longer until disposition (95% CI 12.62-18.54, P<0.05). This discrepancy was greater for patients triaged at lower acuities, with ESI 5 Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients waiting an average of 50.3 and 90.6 minutes longer than ELP patients until disposition (95% CI 17.67-83.57; and 95% CI 24.31-81.57 respectively).

Conclusion: After adjusting for acuity level and age, non-English language preferred patients were at higher odds of admission and experienced disparate wait times, especially at lower acuity levels. Further investigation is needed to understand the causes of these differences and mitigate these health inequities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信