评估“COVID-19测试”在急诊科的实施情况。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Collin Michels, Daniel J Hekman, Rebecca J Schwei, Ryan E Tsuchida, Joshua Gauger, Irene Hurst, Joshua Glazer, Jenna Brink, Ciara Barclay-Buchanan, Manish N Shah, Azita G Hamedani, Michael Pulia
{"title":"评估“COVID-19测试”在急诊科的实施情况。","authors":"Collin Michels, Daniel J Hekman, Rebecca J Schwei, Ryan E Tsuchida, Joshua Gauger, Irene Hurst, Joshua Glazer, Jenna Brink, Ciara Barclay-Buchanan, Manish N Shah, Azita G Hamedani, Michael Pulia","doi":"10.5811/westjem.34850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid, at-home testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was inconsistently available. Consequently, for some patients, emergency departments (ED) became the preferred site to access COVID-19 testing. To improve operational efficiency, our ED implemented a \"COVID-19 Test\" chief concern (CC). Our primary objective in this analysis was to broadly assess the utilization of the new \"COVID-19 Test\" CC and associated clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of ED encounters from an academic ED and an affiliated, community-based ED of all patients after the establishment of a CC of \"COVID-19 Test\" from October 11, 2021-July 31, 2022. The data were extracted from the electronic health record. We calculated descriptive demographic statistics and ran a univariate and multivariate logistic regression with additional diagnostic or therapeutic interventions (binary) as the outcome variable to generate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 320 patients were assigned a \"COVID-19 Test\" CC by a triage nurse. This was 0.5% of all ED encounters in this time frame. Of those, 45% were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Admission or repeat ED visit at 72 hours occurred in 5.3% of patients. Nearly half (46.9%) of patients assigned a \"COVID-19 Test\" CC underwent additional ED interventions. Patients on Medicaid and those who self-identified as Black or Hispanic/Latino were disproportionately represented in the \"COVID-19 Test\" CC group as compared to the overall ED population. In multivariate analysis, an Emergency Severity Index of 1, 2 or 3 was associated with significantly higher odds of receiving additional interventions compared to ESI of 4 or 5 (adjusted OR: 46.85; 95% CI 13.28-165.26; P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients assigned a chief concern of \"COVID-19 Test\" had a high COVID-19 positivity rate, often underwent additional ED interventions, and were at low risk of return ED visits or admission. Minoritized and low-income patients were disproportionately represented in the \"COVID-19 Test\" CC group, highlighting potential disparities in access to at-home COVID-19 testing and implementation of this CC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"507-512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Implementation of a \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" Chief Concern in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Collin Michels, Daniel J Hekman, Rebecca J Schwei, Ryan E Tsuchida, Joshua Gauger, Irene Hurst, Joshua Glazer, Jenna Brink, Ciara Barclay-Buchanan, Manish N Shah, Azita G Hamedani, Michael Pulia\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.34850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid, at-home testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was inconsistently available. Consequently, for some patients, emergency departments (ED) became the preferred site to access COVID-19 testing. To improve operational efficiency, our ED implemented a \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" chief concern (CC). Our primary objective in this analysis was to broadly assess the utilization of the new \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" CC and associated clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of ED encounters from an academic ED and an affiliated, community-based ED of all patients after the establishment of a CC of \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" from October 11, 2021-July 31, 2022. The data were extracted from the electronic health record. We calculated descriptive demographic statistics and ran a univariate and multivariate logistic regression with additional diagnostic or therapeutic interventions (binary) as the outcome variable to generate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 320 patients were assigned a \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" CC by a triage nurse. This was 0.5% of all ED encounters in this time frame. Of those, 45% were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Admission or repeat ED visit at 72 hours occurred in 5.3% of patients. Nearly half (46.9%) of patients assigned a \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" CC underwent additional ED interventions. Patients on Medicaid and those who self-identified as Black or Hispanic/Latino were disproportionately represented in the \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" CC group as compared to the overall ED population. In multivariate analysis, an Emergency Severity Index of 1, 2 or 3 was associated with significantly higher odds of receiving additional interventions compared to ESI of 4 or 5 (adjusted OR: 46.85; 95% CI 13.28-165.26; P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients assigned a chief concern of \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" had a high COVID-19 positivity rate, often underwent additional ED interventions, and were at low risk of return ED visits or admission. Minoritized and low-income patients were disproportionately represented in the \\\"COVID-19 Test\\\" CC group, highlighting potential disparities in access to at-home COVID-19 testing and implementation of this CC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"507-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.34850\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.34850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)的快速家庭检测并不一致。因此,对于一些患者来说,急诊科(ED)成为进行COVID-19检测的首选场所。为了提高运营效率,我们的部门实施了“COVID-19测试”主要关注点(CC)。本分析的主要目的是广泛评估新型“COVID-19检测”CC的使用情况和相关的临床护理。方法:回顾性分析了2021年10月11日至2022年7月31日建立“COVID-19测试”CC后,所有患者在学术急诊科和附属社区急诊科的急诊情况。数据是从电子健康记录中提取的。我们计算了描述性人口统计数据,并以附加诊断或治疗干预(二元)作为结果变量,进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归,以产生优势比(or)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共有320例患者由分诊护士分配“COVID-19 Test”CC。这是这段时间内所有ED遭遇的0.5%。其中,45%被发现为SARS-CoV-2阳性。5.3%的患者在72小时内入院或再次急诊室就诊。在接受“COVID-19测试”CC的患者中,近一半(46.9%)接受了额外的ED干预。与整个ED人群相比,接受医疗补助的患者和自认为是黑人或西班牙裔/拉丁裔的患者在“COVID-19测试”CC组中的比例不成比例。在多变量分析中,紧急程度指数为1、2或3与紧急程度指数为4或5相比,接受额外干预的几率明显更高(调整or: 46.85;95% ci 13.28-165.26;结论:以“COVID-19检测”为主要关注的患者COVID-19阳性率高,经常接受额外的ED干预,回诊或住院的风险低。少数族裔和低收入患者在“COVID-19检测”CC组中所占比例过高,这凸显了在获得家庭COVID-19检测和实施该CC方面可能存在的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Implementation of a "COVID-19 Test" Chief Concern in the Emergency Department.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid, at-home testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was inconsistently available. Consequently, for some patients, emergency departments (ED) became the preferred site to access COVID-19 testing. To improve operational efficiency, our ED implemented a "COVID-19 Test" chief concern (CC). Our primary objective in this analysis was to broadly assess the utilization of the new "COVID-19 Test" CC and associated clinical care.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of ED encounters from an academic ED and an affiliated, community-based ED of all patients after the establishment of a CC of "COVID-19 Test" from October 11, 2021-July 31, 2022. The data were extracted from the electronic health record. We calculated descriptive demographic statistics and ran a univariate and multivariate logistic regression with additional diagnostic or therapeutic interventions (binary) as the outcome variable to generate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: A total of 320 patients were assigned a "COVID-19 Test" CC by a triage nurse. This was 0.5% of all ED encounters in this time frame. Of those, 45% were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Admission or repeat ED visit at 72 hours occurred in 5.3% of patients. Nearly half (46.9%) of patients assigned a "COVID-19 Test" CC underwent additional ED interventions. Patients on Medicaid and those who self-identified as Black or Hispanic/Latino were disproportionately represented in the "COVID-19 Test" CC group as compared to the overall ED population. In multivariate analysis, an Emergency Severity Index of 1, 2 or 3 was associated with significantly higher odds of receiving additional interventions compared to ESI of 4 or 5 (adjusted OR: 46.85; 95% CI 13.28-165.26; P <0.001).

Conclusion: Patients assigned a chief concern of "COVID-19 Test" had a high COVID-19 positivity rate, often underwent additional ED interventions, and were at low risk of return ED visits or admission. Minoritized and low-income patients were disproportionately represented in the "COVID-19 Test" CC group, highlighting potential disparities in access to at-home COVID-19 testing and implementation of this CC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信