现场与急诊科插管:创伤患者住院结果的回顾性回顾

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Mitchell Vorce, Sagar Galwankar, Jarrod Shuck, Amit Agrawal
{"title":"现场与急诊科插管:创伤患者住院结果的回顾性回顾","authors":"Mitchell Vorce, Sagar Galwankar, Jarrod Shuck, Amit Agrawal","doi":"10.5811/westjem.41184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Definitive airway management is crucial for severely injured trauma patients when basic pre-hospital interventions fail to provide adequate oxygenation and ventilation. Endotracheal intubation by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel is often necessary before reaching the emergency department (ED). While some studies suggest that advanced airway protocols in the pre-hospital setting improve survival in patients with severe head injuries, others indicate potential complications and adverse outcomes associated with pre-hospital intubation. In this study we aimed to evaluate whether trauma patients who underwent intubation by EMS in the field experienced different hospital outcomes compared to those intubated by physicians in the ED. Specifically, it assessed the impact of pre-hospital intubation on the number of days requiring mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and overall hospital LOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review at a single, level II trauma center from January 1, 2019-December 31, 2023, involving trauma patients requiring intubation. Patients were divided into two groups: 608 patients ED department (ED ETT). Primary outcomes included days on mechanical ventilation, while secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital LOS. An independent t-test was performed to compare the differences in mean ventilator days, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS between the two groups, accepting P-value of <0.10 as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1,010 patients, with a mean age of 55.5 years in the ED group and 52.5 years in the pre-hospital group. No statistically significant differences were found in mean ventilator days (4.1 ± 4.6 days for the ED group and 4.1 ± 5.7 days for the pre-hospital group), ICU LOS (5.8 ± 6.1 days in the ED ETT group vs 5.6 ± 7.4 days in the pre-hospital ETT group), or overall hospital LOS (10.1 ± 13.6 days in the ED group vs 10.2 ± 17.5 days in the pre-hospital group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate no significant differences in patient outcomes between those intubated pre-hospital and those intubated in the ED. Further research is needed to make modifications to airway management protocols in the pre-hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"751-757"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field vs. Emergency Department Intubation: A Retrospective Review of Hospital Outcomes of Trauma Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Vorce, Sagar Galwankar, Jarrod Shuck, Amit Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.41184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Definitive airway management is crucial for severely injured trauma patients when basic pre-hospital interventions fail to provide adequate oxygenation and ventilation. Endotracheal intubation by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel is often necessary before reaching the emergency department (ED). While some studies suggest that advanced airway protocols in the pre-hospital setting improve survival in patients with severe head injuries, others indicate potential complications and adverse outcomes associated with pre-hospital intubation. In this study we aimed to evaluate whether trauma patients who underwent intubation by EMS in the field experienced different hospital outcomes compared to those intubated by physicians in the ED. Specifically, it assessed the impact of pre-hospital intubation on the number of days requiring mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and overall hospital LOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review at a single, level II trauma center from January 1, 2019-December 31, 2023, involving trauma patients requiring intubation. Patients were divided into two groups: 608 patients ED department (ED ETT). Primary outcomes included days on mechanical ventilation, while secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital LOS. An independent t-test was performed to compare the differences in mean ventilator days, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS between the two groups, accepting P-value of <0.10 as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1,010 patients, with a mean age of 55.5 years in the ED group and 52.5 years in the pre-hospital group. No statistically significant differences were found in mean ventilator days (4.1 ± 4.6 days for the ED group and 4.1 ± 5.7 days for the pre-hospital group), ICU LOS (5.8 ± 6.1 days in the ED ETT group vs 5.6 ± 7.4 days in the pre-hospital ETT group), or overall hospital LOS (10.1 ± 13.6 days in the ED group vs 10.2 ± 17.5 days in the pre-hospital group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate no significant differences in patient outcomes between those intubated pre-hospital and those intubated in the ED. Further research is needed to make modifications to airway management protocols in the pre-hospital setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"751-757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.41184\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.41184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当基本的院前干预不能提供足够的氧合和通气时,明确的气道管理对严重损伤的创伤患者至关重要。在到达急诊科(ED)之前,通常需要由紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员进行气管插管。虽然一些研究表明,院前先进的气道方案可提高严重颅脑损伤患者的生存率,但其他研究表明,院前插管可能导致并发症和不良后果。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估在现场接受EMS插管的创伤患者与在急诊科接受医生插管的创伤患者是否有不同的医院结局。具体而言,它评估了院前插管对需要机械通气的天数、重症监护病房住院时间(ICU LOS)和整体医院LOS的影响。方法:我们对2019年1月1日至2023年12月31日在单一二级创伤中心进行回顾性图表回顾,涉及需要插管的创伤患者。患者分为两组:急诊科(ED ETT) 608例患者。主要结局包括机械通气天数,次要结局包括ICU和医院LOS。采用独立t检验比较两组平均呼吸机天数、ICU LOS和医院LOS的差异,接受p值结果:研究纳入1010例患者,ED组平均年龄55.5岁,院前组平均年龄52.5岁。在平均呼吸机天数(ED组为4.1±4.6天,院前组为4.1±5.7天)、ICU LOS (ED ETT组为5.8±6.1天,院前ETT组为5.6±7.4天)或医院总体LOS (ED组为10.1±13.6天,院前组为10.2±17.5天)方面均无统计学差异。结论:这些研究结果表明院前插管与急诊科插管患者的预后无显著差异。院前环境下气道管理方案的修改需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field vs. Emergency Department Intubation: A Retrospective Review of Hospital Outcomes of Trauma Patients.

Introduction: Definitive airway management is crucial for severely injured trauma patients when basic pre-hospital interventions fail to provide adequate oxygenation and ventilation. Endotracheal intubation by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel is often necessary before reaching the emergency department (ED). While some studies suggest that advanced airway protocols in the pre-hospital setting improve survival in patients with severe head injuries, others indicate potential complications and adverse outcomes associated with pre-hospital intubation. In this study we aimed to evaluate whether trauma patients who underwent intubation by EMS in the field experienced different hospital outcomes compared to those intubated by physicians in the ED. Specifically, it assessed the impact of pre-hospital intubation on the number of days requiring mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and overall hospital LOS.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review at a single, level II trauma center from January 1, 2019-December 31, 2023, involving trauma patients requiring intubation. Patients were divided into two groups: 608 patients ED department (ED ETT). Primary outcomes included days on mechanical ventilation, while secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital LOS. An independent t-test was performed to compare the differences in mean ventilator days, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS between the two groups, accepting P-value of <0.10 as significant.

Results: The study included 1,010 patients, with a mean age of 55.5 years in the ED group and 52.5 years in the pre-hospital group. No statistically significant differences were found in mean ventilator days (4.1 ± 4.6 days for the ED group and 4.1 ± 5.7 days for the pre-hospital group), ICU LOS (5.8 ± 6.1 days in the ED ETT group vs 5.6 ± 7.4 days in the pre-hospital ETT group), or overall hospital LOS (10.1 ± 13.6 days in the ED group vs 10.2 ± 17.5 days in the pre-hospital group).

Conclusion: These findings indicate no significant differences in patient outcomes between those intubated pre-hospital and those intubated in the ED. Further research is needed to make modifications to airway management protocols in the pre-hospital setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信